It can't get to the truth because it originates from inside of us, and the gap between us and the ultimate and
eternal is far too great for us to surmount.
Not exact matches
Then again, I
am an
eternal optimist, and the measure of what I gain on a daily basis from my shared work environment
far outweighs any internal gripes I might have.
But (for me) it
's far wiser to stick to concrete consequences (like playing on the freeway, or choosing to play in a playground instead) rather than resorting to «
eternal» punishments or rewards in order for people to make proper decisions.
@Chad «the really fascinating aspect of Alexander Vilenkin Kinematic Incompleteness Theorem (the Borde Guth Vilenkin Theorem)
is that not only demonstrates that OUR universe had a beginning, but it goes
further to demonstrate that ANY universe (Multi-verse,
Eternal Inflation, Cyclic Evolution, and Static Seed (Emergent Universe), etc.) that has a Hubble expansion greater than zero had a beginning.»
Christian,
far - right, conservatives
are damned to
eternal «no - fun» for fun on earth; when they get to heaven for following their obsessive «no - fun, living by misconstrued, so - called gospel agenda they'll cultivate new customers cultivating protein by worms and other parasites preparing the living earth for new life!
The freedom of the Gospel, the capacity to entrust oneself to
eternal love,
far from «cramping our style» or «stunting our humanity»
is the only access - route to true fulfilment, by means of a genuine participation in the divine life.
This
is further evidence of Mind (and of the relationship of humanity to God and his
eternal Son, Jesus Christ - but that
's another question).
Far from a «contradiction of life,» this
is an encompassing of the whole of life, a «transfiguration» of all limiting and restricting calculations of worth and importance, an
eternal Yes to all peoples and places.
For our light and momentary troubles
are achieving for us an
eternal glory that
far outweighs them all.
Music styles might possibly
be in first place, but if so, the issue of
eternal security
is not
far behind.
Now at some time in the
eternal security debate, after all this talk about grace, someone says something like, «I think you
're taking this grace thing a little bit too
far.
Now, having established that God
was,
is, and will always
be naked (The
eternal God, you know), let's carry this a bit
further.
According to catholic teaching, the existence of hell, of a state of
eternal damnation,
is an article of faith (as indeed, given free will and evil, it
is a logical necessity); but that some human
beings are or will
be in fact damned
is not an article of faith (though again logically it must
be regarded as a possibility): hence Pere Teilhard's prayer
further on in this passage.
Therefore, it
is only in so
far as we
are, as Paul expresses it, «in Christ», united with him by faith which responds to God's grace reaching out to us in him, that we may hope to
be raised to a share in his risen life of communion with the
eternal God.
For Islam, the present world
is but a transitory existence to
be followed by the
Eternal World which
is better by
far, «And verily the latter portion will
be better for thee than the former» (Surah XCIII, 4).
But, beyond these limitations of particulars, the general modal individualisation
is limited in two ways: In the first place it
is an actual course of events, which might
be otherwise so
far as concerns
eternal possibility, but
is that course.
Far from
being secondary, it
was primary — the first element in Jesus» original preaching and the ultimate consummation of the «
eternal purpose.»
Far more pervasive, however, than this apparent reconciliation with Buddhism,
are the principal themes of
eternal death and Christ's descent into hell.
So
far as I know, this
is the only rigorous formal classification (which as formal and a mere classification
is beyond intelligent controversy) of possible doctrines about God — except mere dichotomies (e.g., God
is or
is not
eternal, one with all reality, etc.), which
are never very helpful because only one of the two classes has positive content.
An extended quote from Robert Wilkin provides
further insight into why some believe in Jesus and others do not, and also what God
is doing to help all people believe in Jesus for
eternal life:
Consider
further that the Book of Life, as it applies to unbelievers,
is a record of those who have offered perfect obedience before God and
are thus worthy of
eternal life when they
are judged by God on the basis of their works at the White Throne Judgment (Romans 2:6 - 16, Romans 10:4, Galatians 3:10 - 12, Revelations 20:11 - 15), none of whose names will actually
be found in the Book of Life and will therefore
be condemned (Matthew 19:16 - 22).
In order to interpret this core - principle of revelation, we must understand its essential presupposition; namely, that events
are present «in» other events - present not just abstractly (through «
eternal objects»), i.e., mediated by the «general,» but as singular events that effect their
further history by their unique concreteness (PR 338).12 Whitehead recognizes precisely this constellation when he says:» [T] he truism that we can only conceive in terms of universals has
been stretched to mean that we can only feel in terms of universals.
In the end, Paul's message in the first half of his letter to the Romans points to one single truth: Because God has done everything necessary as
far as our
eternal life
is concerned, there
is absolutely nothing we (or anyone or anything else) can do to lose our
eternal life once we have it.
They
are far too late to the party to play the role of an onramp to the chain of
eternal security given that foreknowledge and predestination long precede it,
being before the foundation of the world.
As for
eternal damnation, hell, and all that — it
's far too complex for me to weigh in... I think hell exists for those who separate themselves from God, but we know from the Book of Acts that Christians
were having themselves baptized in the name of the dead.
Having established that God
was,
is, and will always
be naked (The
eternal God, you know), let's carry this a bit
further.
And whatever the number of our days may thus
far have
been, we
are equidistant from that
eternal God.
nihilism: compassion doesn't really exist evolutionary naturalism: compassion
is a foil for survival goals religion: compassion serves a transcendent reality (in so
far as it reflects that reality) Christianity (in particular): compassion
is the most powerful force in history, and reveals God's
eternal heart
We believe that this representation of the structure of
eternal objects by Prolog programs could
be a helpful tool for
further analysis of Whitehead's discussion of the structure of
eternal objects (see SMW, chapter 11).
The conclusion I want to pull out of these considerations
is this: if there
is at least one actual entity in the world characterized by at least one
eternal object, one specific form of definiteness, then this actual entity provides all the ontological ground required for the realm of
eternal objects — an appeal to God
is not necessary.11 And, indeed, in Whitehead, as in Aristotle, there
is an eternity and an abeternity of becoming so that within the terms of the system it
is inconceivable that there
be any region of the extensive continuum, no matter how
far it
be extended fore or aft, where there
is not a generation of actual entities exhibiting concrete forms of definiteness.
In fact, he repeatedly criticizes traditional monisms for not carrying this principle
far enough; they exempted
eternal being from dependence on temporal
beings.
As Paul recognized in the Christian Church the marks of the supernatural Messianic community, in so
far as it
was the Body of Christ, so John teaches that knowledge of God and
eternal life
are enjoyed by those who
are united to Christ.
You and I know that as
far as
eternal life
is concerned, even if we
're faithless and morally asleep (2 Tim 2:13 and 1 Thess 5:6,10), we'll live with Him.
Nor can it
be wisdom to say, indiscriminately, that this something
eternal has its time like the perishable, that it makes its circle like the wind that never gets
further; that it has its course like the river that never fills up the sea.
For so
far as the child
is concerned, one does not talk about despair but only about ill - temper, because one has only a right to assume that the
eternal is present in the child, and has never a right to demand it of the child, as one has a right to demand it of the grown man, to whom it applies that he shall have it.
The introverted despairer thus lives on horis succesivis [successive hours], through hours which, though they
are not lived for eternity, have nevertheless something to do with the
eternal,
being employed about the relationship of one's self to itself — but he really gets no
further than this.
The immediate man (in so
far as immediacy
is to
be found without any reflection)
is merely soulishly determined, his self or he himself
is a something included along with «the other» in the compass of the temporal and the worldly, and it has only an illusory appearance of possessing in it something
eternal.
Despair over the earthly or over something earthly
is really despair also about the
eternal and over oneself, in so
far as it
is despair, for this
is the formula for all despair.
But the despairer, as he
was depicted in the foregoing, did not observe what
was happening behind him, so to speak; he thinks he
is in despair over something earthly and constantly talks about what he
is in despair over, and yet he
is in despair about the
eternal; for the fact that he ascribes such great value to the earthly, or, to carry the thought
further, that he ascribes to something earthly such great value, or that he first transforms something earthly into everything earthly, and then ascribes to the earthly such great value,
is precisely to despair about the
eternal.
The good news in Scripture
is that God has done everything that needs doing as
far as your
eternal life
is concerned.
[18:46] Money and children
are the joys of this life, but the righteous works provide an
eternal recompense from your Lord, and a
far better hope.
Further, it
is not entirely clear in Whitehead's writings whether God
is to
be conceived as a single,
eternal actual entity, or whether, after the manner of other personal
beings, he
is to
be regarded as a personally ordered, temporal series of actual entities.
A definite
eternal object
is what it
is apart from creativity, while an indefinite form depends upon creativity for its
further determination.
So, with no
further ado, I will let Duncan Stroik, editor of Sacred Architecture, say it: «Everywhere I went in Italy last summer, save the
eternal city, churches
were asking an admission fee.
In so
far as «C major»
is highly valued in this particular aesthetic synthesis, it
is included and with it every other
eternal object with which it
is internally related — including «D major.»
It reveals something which can not
be destined for the worms... this
is far from all theology, simply the fact that the poorest little woodcutter, heath peasant or miner can have moments of emotion and a frame of mind which give him a feeling of an
eternal home to which he
is near.
yeah i think we should
be far more intersted in the hells we make on earth then worrying about
eternal life — a theology conjured up when people died much younger.
Believing that ritualistic superst!tions (praying in a specified manner, washing a certain way, visiting a holy shrine, bowing to an imaginary supernatural
being, etc.) will somehow magically convince this super-
being to * do * anything
is simply not the truth; then going one step
further and proclaiming that these beliefs
are the * only * way or we will suffer
eternal damnation.
Man as we know him today, man of metaphysics, of abstract thought, the creator of his own environment, the space - traveller, the moulder of himself, the man of God and of grace and of the promise of
eternal life, precisely this man who
is radically distinct from any animal and who at the moment of man's origin, though perhaps very slowly, took a path which led him so
far away from all that
is merely animal, yet in such a fashion that he carried with him the whole inheritance of his biological pre-history into these realms of his existence remote from the animals,
was there when man began to exist.18 And what now
is historically and externally manifest,
was then present as a task and as an active potentiality.
First, there»...
is an actual course of events, which might
be otherwise so
far as concerns
eternal possibility, but
is that course.»