This view is complemented by an understanding of
the eternal laws of power, as borrowed from Ancient Greece, dictating that the strong do as they like and the weak must endure.
First, the caste community consists of four castes that are hierarchically ordered) The Brahmins (priests) are the preservers and protectors of
the eternal laws of the Universe (Dharma); the Ksatriyas (rulers and warriors) are the defenders and the guarantors of the safety and security of the community; the Vaisyas (business persons) are the conservers and distributors of wealth; and the Sudras (the laborers) are the working majority involved in the production of essential commodities.
It's one of
the eternal laws of economics, like gravity in physics.
My body had been some time dead before I was at liberty to quit it, lest it should by any accident return to life: this is an injunction imposed on all souls by
the eternal law of fate, to prevent the inconveniences which would follow.
Not exact matches
Before the «Dispensation
of Grace»
of God, by which we are saved through «Faith in Jesus Christ» as Lord and our personal Savior, Jesus Christ fulfilled the «
Law of God» on our behalf during His ministry on earth, died on the «Holy Cross» for the «Remission
of Our Sins» once and for all, descended to hell and defeated death, then rose from the dead on the third day bringing us «
Eternal Life» and «Reconciliation» with God the Father!
Have those misconceptions about the
Law given to the Jews clearly explained and find out why God allows suffering and where the idea
of a hellfire really came from and what the truth is that leads to
eternal life.
While it does not appear to me that bin Laden in any way obeyed the
Laws of God, and thereby lived out
of love, and therefore, yes, is more than likely facing
eternal perdition, I can not know that.
The Lord Jesus Christ fulfilled the
Law on our behalf, died on the Holy Cross for the remission
of our sins (became sin and curse for us) descended to hell and defeated death (keys
of which were held by Satan,) rose from the dead on the third day bringing us
eternal life and reconciliation with God the Father, then ascended to Heaven promising us the Holy Spirit and preparing the place for us.
The material can't be
eternal due to what we know
of the
laws of thermodynamics and the observations I've already noted.
and at the time
of jesus moses gallileo newton charles darwin, people opposed them but ultimately the same people bowed to their
eternal truth, so norm is man made not natural and it changes from time to time, the only thing which is self reliant and unchanging is mother nature, so Sikh faith is not a ritualistic dumb faith, indeed it's a lifestyle which tells to «Respect and follow The
Laws of Nature and not to destroyy the beauty
of nature».
Laws change according to the needs
of the people, Truth is
eternal.
But to believe the universe is
eternal is inconsistent with the
laws of thermodynamics, namely that disorder tends to increase with time.
Once you characterize God as
eternal, omniscient, omnipotent, not subject to or constrained by the
laws of nature you can claim anything you want about him.
The point is this: Stop thinking that when you share the Four Spiritual
Laws, or the Romans Road, or the plan
of salvation, or given an altar call, or invite someone to believe in Jesus for
eternal life, or any
of the other myriad
of things that Christians today call «sharing the gospel,» stop thinking that you have actually shared the Gospel.
And just as there are certainties we have learned from nature, such as the
laws of science, gravity, and thermodynamics, there are also certainties we can learn from Scripture, such as the holiness
of God, our own sinfulness, and our need to believe in Jesus for
eternal life.
Does not the New Creation (
Eternal Recurrence)
of Zarathustra parallel the New Creation
of Jesus (the Kingdom
of God) insofar as it shatters history, dissolves all rational meaning, and brings to an end the rule
of Law?
John Calvin managed to invert the lesson
of the passage almost entirely: The young ruler, he claimed, had asked an inept question, supposing that one could secure
eternal life through works, and thus Christ's metaphor was meant as an illustration
of the impossibility
of anyone fulfilling the requirements
of the
law, and
of the need therefore for a total reliance upon faith.
In the first instance, the
Law, affirmed as the fixed and immutable expression
of God's
eternal will, and spelled out in theological and ethical formulas, was the sole and sufficient guide for man's conduct.
God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Bible and Theology Questions,
eternal life, faith, gospel, grace, Jesus,
law, never heard the gospel, Theology
of Salvation
He would have everyone focus on anything but the high price Jesus paid for believers
eternal redemption from the curse
of the
law.
Yet even simplicity's great sponsor Thomas Aquinas had a concept
of eternal law, which opens the door to the possibility that there is a
law common to God and creatures and that God submits to a
law that is, in the end, the definitive expression
of his own character.
But we know, as they could not, that honouring the natural
law of marriage can lead us, by grace, to the
eternal banquet where all are made «one flesh» — one body, one spirit, in Christ.
For elucidation
of the difference
of the repetition
of the singular to the forming
of laws, Deleuze points to Kant's paradigm
of the «Categorical Imperative,» which states a individual standard as general
law of the same or similar actions, and opposes it to Nietzsche's anti-legalistic postulate
of the «
eternal return»: It is the repetition
of the singular which can not be understood by any
law.
In the Summa Theologiae, Aquinas does not mean to say that natural
law is shared by all animals including human beings» the natural
law, as the «participation
of the
eternal law in the rational creature,» pertains only to human beings (I - II, 91.2)» but that natural
law includes natural inclinations shared by other animals, «such as sexual intercourse, education
of offspring, and so forth.»
He never states that the
law is a way
of receiving
eternal life from God, but constantly shows that the
law IS a way
of living like residents
of the Kingdom
of God.
Well, one thing we can say with certainty (and in full agreement with Paul), is that the
Law was never given as a way to gain
eternal life, or a means
of pleasing and appeasing God.
He is: • Supernatural in nature (as He exists outside
of His creation) • Incredibly powerful (to have created all that is known) •
Eternal (self - existent, as He exists outside
of time and space) • Omnipresent (He created space and is not limited by it) • Timeless and changeless (He created time) • Immaterial (because He transcends space) • Personal (the impersonal can't create personality) • Necessary (as everything else depends on Him) • Infinite and singular (as you can not have two infinites) • Diverse yet has unity (as nature exhibits diversity) • Intelligent (supremely, to create everything) • Purposeful (as He deliberately created everything) • Moral (no moral
law can exist without a lawgiver) • Caring (or no moral
laws would have been given)
Today as i was thinking about Jesus sending the demons into the pigs and i thought God is not punishing but judging and he made a decision.This idea came from your other discussion which i believe is what he does he decides to make a judgement call he is sovereign and it shows his tender heart and mercy that not a single person was afflicted.The pigs unlike men have no soul so have no
eternal consequence upon them they live and they die.either way they were going to get killed.We can be assured that Gods judgements are right and just the pork was going to the gentile nations who worshipped other Gods and no doubt would have been offered to idols so there is a consequence when we disobey the
Laws of God even even when we do nt know or understand his
laws.brentnz
As Niebuhr put it so well, «The effort to bring Christ and culture, God's work and man's, the temporal and the
eternal,
law and grace, into one system
of thought and practice tends, perhaps inevitably, to the absolutizing
of what is relative, the reduction
of the infinite to a finite form, and the materialization
of the dynamic.»
If a sinner, then, relies on his actings
of faith or works
of obedience to any
of the commands
of the
law for a title to
eternal life, he seeks to be justified by works
of the
law as much as if his works were perfect.
God is: • Supernatural in nature (as He exists outside
of His creation) • Incredibly powerful (to have created all that is known) •
Eternal (self - existent, as He exists outside
of time and space) • Omnipresent (He created space and is not limited by it) • Timeless and changeless (He created time) • Immaterial (because He transcends space) • Personal (the impersonal can't create personality) • Necessary (as everything else depends on Him) • Infinite and singular (as you can not have two infinites) • Diverse yet has unity (as nature exhibits diversity) • Intelligent (supremely, to create everything) • Purposeful (as He deliberately created everything) • Moral (no moral
law can exist without a lawgiver) • Caring (or no moral
laws would have been given)
And I ended up rejecting it, because I think that the emphasis on the
law completely misses the point
of the
law and misrepresents the good news message
of Jesus that anyone and everyone can have
eternal life simply and only by believing in Jesus for it.
ME II, Yes and no, this is what Henry Davis is referring to when he says «higher
law of conscience» or Romans 1 states «For since the creation
of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His
eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse...»
For He is the literal Incarnation
of the
eternal Person
of God the Word, and it is in Him and for Him as well as through Him that the
Law of Creation was set out in the first place.
Critics
of religion often claim that its adherents grovellingly obey moral
laws, not for the sake
of leading a good life or behaving altruistically, but for fear
of eternal punishment at the hands
of a vindictive God.
Working in light
of the redemption and the revelation
of Trinitarian communion, a biblical theologian can affirm both a natural created and graced participation in what Thomas called the
eternal law.
My essay affirms a very orthodox view
of Rabbinical Judaism, as our Chukat Olam (
eternal law).
Among Lutherans there was a drift toward natural theology in which the existence
of God and the moral
law were treated apart from the special revelation
of God in Jesus Christ In Reformed circles, there was both a fascination with natural theology and a concentration on the
eternal decrees
of God.
Bob — his «
law», via your 1st commandment, is that everyone must worship only him — under penalty
of death and
eternal torture.
I believe that Jesus was teaching an interpretation
of the Mosaic
law which would make it easier for Jews to keep, and which would open the door
of the kingdom to all people, not just to Jews, and that ultimately,
eternal life is not about keeping the
law anyway, but is all about grace, from first to last.
But precisely for this reason all Christians do not only receive a complete and supposedly concrete natural
law which is communicated to them by the official representatives
of the Church, they also find out for them - selves the actual requirements
of public life, so that all may have as much freedom as possible, a freedom that can act with God in view and thus create that personal finality which receives God himself as its
eternal meaning.
Thus freedom is always called to decisions which can not be derived from general norms and
eternal laws alone (even though they must not contradict them) and which nevertheless are not left to an arbitrary choice but claim the whole man because
of his special call.
The
Law of Polarity dictates that not just one but both components of pairs of ultimate contraries should be affirmed as true because they are mutually interdependent and correlative.30 Accordingly, Hartshorne, in obeying this law, insists that God is both absolute and relative, infinite and finite, individual and universal, active and passive, eternal and temporal, cause and effect, creative and created, et cete
Law of Polarity dictates that not just one but both components
of pairs
of ultimate contraries should be affirmed as true because they are mutually interdependent and correlative.30 Accordingly, Hartshorne, in obeying this
law, insists that God is both absolute and relative, infinite and finite, individual and universal, active and passive, eternal and temporal, cause and effect, creative and created, et cete
law, insists that God is both absolute and relative, infinite and finite, individual and universal, active and passive,
eternal and temporal, cause and effect, creative and created, et cetera.
Modern thought has been dominated by notions
of eternal being, natural
laws, and scientific determinisms, with the result that man's creativity, hope, and awareness
of freedom have been stifled.
His devotion to the Torah exhibits a knowledge
of both written and oral
law (a basic definition
of Pharisaism as opposed to Sadducism and Essenism), and he repeatedly affirmed the Pharisaic doctrine
of the resurrection
of the body and the
eternal life
of the soul.
The observations
of the COBE satellite and Hubble telescope prove the universe had a beginning and the
laws of thermodynamics show the universe could not create itself out
of a steady state
of absolute nothing and can't be
eternal.
We do all
of this in direct defiance
of God's
Law in the Bible because we know God and his «
eternal word» are completely wrong.
It is true that Islam believes in a single and
eternal creator God who has revealed his will and his
law to men through prophets, but the understanding
of God and
of his revelation is markedly different from Christianity.
Back then, he said, «The danger in all
of this discussion is that Christians sometimes are willing to sacrifice the temporal for the
eternal, that in order to get their candidate elected, to enact those
laws that they feel are crucial, somehow we fool ourselves into thinking we are going to bring about the kingdom
of God here on Earth.
It places pleasure above love, health and well - being above the sacredness
of life, the participation
of special interests groups in governance above democratic representation, women's rights above motherhood, the empowerment
of the selfish individual above any form
of legitimate authority, ethics above morality, the right to choose above the
eternal law written in the human heart, democracy and humanism above divine revelation — in a nutshell, immanence above transcendence, man above God, the «world» above «heaven».