Not exact matches
Hence, we must attribute to God not only the conceptual ordering of the
eternal objects by virtue of
which he lures the occasions of the world toward order and
value; we must attribute to him as to all other actual entities physical feelings as well.
It is these real possibilities and not simply
eternal objects
which need to be
valued by God.
Later the subject will select the «ideal of itself» from the «objective lure»,
which is the original fund of
values and
eternal objects it can draw upon.
Originally as the principle of limitation, the principle of concretion determined
which of the
eternal objects would be actualizable in the world, now each occasion actualizes itself in terms of God's gradation of
values.
For Whitehead evidently supposes that it is the
value which God apprehends an
eternal object as possessing, or its suitability for ingression in a particular context,
which makes it a lure for action.
With these considerations it is possible to note the following characteristics
which both
eternal objects and propositions share: 1) potentiality or «patience» for realization, 2) indeterminacy or abstraction from actualities, and 3) absence of truth -
value.
In the last chapter we explained that the «resurrection of the dead» expresses the hope that the whole of a man's life from beginning to end will be raised before the divine Judgment Seat and be accepted by God as possessing something of
value which will give it an
eternal meaning.
The
value is shaped by the definite
eternal relatedness — the eidos — or, that to
which the creator «looks» for guidance.
In so far as «C major» is highly
valued in this particular aesthetic synthesis, it is included and with it every other
eternal object with
which it is internally related — including «D major.»
Anger as an
eternal object is not a
value; it is this particular instance of anger as characterizing this particular unit of feeling
which is a
value.
The term «resurrection of the dead» should not be interpreted as a hope for the prolongation or restoration of our own conscious existence, but rather a hope that human life has meaning, that when our conscious existence is ended, the historical life we have lived may be raised before the
eternal Judge, and may be vindicated, as being of some
value for that Kingdom
which is
eternal and for whose fuller manifestation on earth we ever pray.
And this shift, though «a deep and radical revolt against the central tradition of western thought
which affirmed the existence of
eternal values,» is, in Berlin's eyes, a very good thing.
This is such a huge subject that I must beg indulgence, therefore, if I give my space to but a small fraction of the historic faith — namely its main emphases on God, Christ, the Church, and
eternal life — and consider only these in our modem context, in the effort to discover what
values they may have for men and women who are tossed about in an unsettled world, with an uncertain future, and doomed — almost certainly it seems — to a doubtful truce of arms, at worst to a war
which threatens to annihilate man as we have known him and in any event to leave us a bare existence such as we can eke out on a totally devastated planet.
The following verses through the first part of verse 15 illustrates how only the work
which is built upon the foundation of Jesus Christ will have
eternal value.
This property amounts to the recovery, on behalf of
value amid the transitoriness of reality, of the self - identity
which is also enjoyed by the primary
eternal objects.
Since an
eternal object is that pattern
which brings
value or intrinsic reality to an event, it gives the happening an end by making the event an end in itself.
Eternal objects, therefore, «ingress» into (enter into the constitution of, become ingredient in) the process of realization
which culminates in the synthesis of possibility and actuality into a concrete, fully determinate
value.
to the idea that material advance, if it is to become meaningful and to enhance the quality of life, should recognize the spiritual real iii of
eternal values towards
which religions point.
Cobb says,»... the way in
which God functions as the principle of limitation is by ordering the infinite possibilities of the
eternal objects according to principles of
value.
But whether or not there is, perhaps, some trace of a love like Georges's and Anne's that lingers on, that really is as immortal as true love can feel to us, we can at least be certain of one thing: The
value of a work of art as perfectly achieved as Amour, with its true, profound, and thorough tribute to the emotion after
which it's named, is, for whatever it's worth, as close to imperishable and
eternal as it gets.