Sentences with phrase «eternal was shown»

The work If form disappears its root is eternal was shown at Punta della Dogana in the exhibition «Prima Materia».

Not exact matches

My stance and my conviction is sure, because what I know was shown to me, and it is unchangeable, eternal truth.

And one of the benefits of being a sent preacher is that once you first become sent, the eternal God will take you and actually show you the lake of fire and brimstone.

It would be effortless for him to show himself, like he seemed to do pretty regularly back in the bronze age, and he wouldn't have to send so many people either born in the wrong place or people trusting logic and science over blind faith, to eternal fire and pain and torment.

This is a great example that shows focusing on the now (temporal) and not the then (eternal).

It is because you will be judged according to your sins and since you don't have anything to show as payment for those sins, you will be judged to eternal death and suffering.

(1 Timothy 6: 12 - 16) Again showing a difference between eternal life and immortality, and the the encouragement is to lay hold of eternal life as opposed to laying hold of immortality.

People have shown to be too smart to fall for the ridiculous notion that A. the universe is either eternal or came from nothing B. Morality is a figment of our imagination C. And also, despite the aforementioned, religion is objectively immoral.

It would be effortless to show himself, like he seemed to do pretty regularly back in the bronze age, and he wouldn't have so many people he would have to send to eternal fire and pain and torment.

«saved through childbirth» is my favorite verse to show that «saved» can not in EVERY passage refer to the usually understood definition, «obtaining eternal life through faith in Christ»

But this passage is not talking about how to receive eternal life, but is instead talking about how God rescued us from our enslavement to the sin of death and showed us a new way of life in Jesus Christ.

establish the substance of God as shown in the Bible to be the eternal state ----- The bible, and any religion, is 100 % unecessary to have a notion or belief in «God», or a higher spiritual / creative power.

My intent was to establish the substance of God as shown in the Bible to be the eternal state absent any of the theology that raises the hair on the necks of atheists.

Scripture is not clear on the eternal position of Judas, who the Bible declares to have shown remorse and confessed that he had sinned (Matt 27:3).

But what this illustration does show is that the car of eternal life helps us along the road of discipleship.

1 Camus, however, never shows any interest in «eternal salvation,» and it is highly unlikely that Camus was on his way down the trail blazed by Eliot and Auden.

So when I am talking with someone, I will often take a little gospel of John, I prefer the ones called Living Water since they have little notes that remind me what verses are key, and what the verses mean, and in just a minute or two, can show a person from Scripture that to get eternal life, all they have to do is believe in Jesus for it.

Mormons show us that the only way beyond the immaterial idealism of Plato is through the eternal embodiment of Jesus Christ.

Out of ten tribes there are only two verses that are negative and seven that show eternal or temporal brotherhood.

He never states that the law is a way of receiving eternal life from God, but constantly shows that the law IS a way of living like residents of the Kingdom of Gois a way of receiving eternal life from God, but constantly shows that the law IS a way of living like residents of the Kingdom of GoIS a way of living like residents of the Kingdom of God.

Today as i was thinking about Jesus sending the demons into the pigs and i thought God is not punishing but judging and he made a decision.This idea came from your other discussion which i believe is what he does he decides to make a judgement call he is sovereign and it shows his tender heart and mercy that not a single person was afflicted.The pigs unlike men have no soul so have no eternal consequence upon them they live and they die.either way they were going to get killed.We can be assured that Gods judgements are right and just the pork was going to the gentile nations who worshipped other Gods and no doubt would have been offered to idols so there is a consequence when we disobey the Laws of God even even when we do nt know or understand his laws.brentnz

Oh you mean, like come down to Earth as a man, live a perfect life, then get executed for crimes He didn't commit, resurrect, then show us all that our sins are forgiven and that we all can have eternal life?

The primary purpose of this article is to show the similarity between Prolog programming and Whiteheadian philosophy and to use Prolog programming to illustrate some aspects of the concepts of eternal objects, propositions, actual entities, and concrescence.

Whitehead remains an empiricist, but shows early this romantic streak of Platonism that is given expression in his doctrine of the realm of eternal objects.

So my twofold task is first to show what it is about the treatment of eternal objects in Science and the Modern World which makes the Aristotelian move possible, and then secondly to suggest a way of handling the source of subjective aims without there being any need to implicate God in the procedure.

If Christ lives in His Church, then love shown to the brethren is a part of that communion with Christ which is life eternal.

My criticism of Whitehead would be that while he makes token acknowledgment of the Aristotelian principle, his concept of God as a non-temporal entity ontologically grounding the realm of eternal objects shows that his heart basically remains with Plato.

They usually show people displaying eternal smiles, which are usually unrepresentative of the faces they really wore.

Then, in one of the few departures from Scripture in this long biblical section, Lazarus is shown sitting up in a daze after being pulled out of his eternal sleep.

Religion permeates our culture, shows up on our doorsteps with literature, scriptures and threats of eternal d.a.m.nation, influences our science books, contaminates our political systems, indoctrinates our children and postulates that its doctrine must be followed, lest we be destroyed in body, in soul, or both.

When the pastor speaks of faith in eternal life, he will try to show that this faith is a declaration about present reality, not only a promise of something beyond death.

While initially it might seem that Paul is referring to the initial act of faith in Jesus Christ by which people receive eternal life, the following verse shows that this is not at all what Paul is referring to.

But, drawing on the Hartshornian abstract - concrete dichotomy and the related eternal - temporal distinction in Whitehead, Gibson shows how process theism consistently combines the two traditions, retaining from each what is essential to a «working religion.»

Even if we were to grant (for the sake of argument only) that God could or would intervene in this way in earthly affairs, God's resurrection of this one person can not logically support the likelihood of salvation for the rest of us: (A) It can not prove that God is able to save us from death and grant us eternal life; (B) it can not guarantee that God is interested in doing this; and (C) it does not even show that God will forgive our sins.

Here is what he wrote about how D. L. Moody used John 5:24 to show him that he could be sure he had eternal life through faith in Jesus Christ:

(A) The resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth does not even show that God was able to grant eternal life to this one individual, much less to the rest of us.

If Jesus were walking earth today teaching, would He still teach about honor (showing that striving for honor is better than striving for wealth), OR would He use the primary social value of today, and teach us to strive for eternal wealth?

Some might suppose that God's pronouncement that he «loved» Jacob and «hated» Esau shows that he is speaking about their individual eternal destinies, but this is mistaken.

John is the only evangelistic Gospel, written to show how to receive eternal life.

Even if, however, all the contextual and exegetical material presented above is wrong, and this verse does in fact teach that God ordained these particular Gentiles to receive eternal life (which the arguments above show He did not), this verse is still not a good proof - text for the Calvinistic doctrine of Unconditional Election.

Gods love is shown through His Son Jesus when you or I believe in Him (Jesus) for eternal life.

This Section of his argument, and indeed the whole burden of his comment, seem to show clearly that what in the end is raised by the issues we have been discussing, is the relation of the temporal to the eternal.

Which is the more loving... To not say anything to a non Christian about sin in their life that separates them from God and salvation because we don't want to offend them and let them go to eternal damnation, or show them that are a sinner deserving of hell, but that Jesus loves them and that He died in their place to give them true life and bring them into eternal salvation?

The observations of the COBE satellite and Hubble telescope prove the universe had a beginning and the laws of thermodynamics show the universe could not create itself out of a steady state of absolute nothing and can't be eternal.

«Remenber all scpritures are inspired words from God, my point is, Jesus wants us to be more than religious, but obedient.Jefferson is just stating that American Churches have become more corrupted with its religious practices that they have forgotten about jesus along the way.The church has taken scriptures and have use them according to what is pleasing to themselves.Jesus wants us to forget about what is pleasing to ourselves and follow him, be like him, love him (means be obedient to him) and ignore what we have known as religion.I define religion as jefferson is using in the video as an act of man pretending or decieving himself into believing that he know God and that he is better than others.He shows that by what he know / pratice not really whats in his heart and by serving how we choose which is pleasing to us, so we use God as a vessel praticing holy rituals teaching what we have made tradition and we have a eternal life with God.God created religion in order for us to remenber him and have a personal relationship with him through his son regardless of the many mistakes we have made in the past.We need to remenber God Forgets our past «he sperate our sins from us as far as the east is from the west».

By giving him eternal rest in the Arabian sea showed consideration for Islam, if we were against the religion of Islam we would have done to him what the Islamic extreamists have done to our service members, strip them nude and drag them through the streets and then hang their bodies in public for passers by to throw stones and garbage at.

From what I can gleam from what Jeremy is saying, he is trying show us what eternal life through Christ looks like through Gods eyes not ours.

The eternal objects were shown to depend for their efficacy upon God's envisagement.

But unless it can be shown that the theopaschite understanding corresponds to the eternal truth about God, then adroit theological shifts to meet the needs of the moment simply validate the atheist's charge that theology is nothing but an endless series of ad hoc rationalizations.

In fact, a further reading of Eckhart would show that the Godhead is inexhaustible and remains intact despite the eternal generation of the Son.