Not exact matches
The United States expanded its federal biofuels
mandate in a 2007 law to reach 36 billion gallons by 2022, with up to 15 billion gallons coming
from corn
ethanol and the balance
from so - called advanced biofuels like cellulosic
ethanol.
Obama has, however, also been a supporter of
ethanol made primarily
from corn — a prominent industry in his home state of Illinois — and recently told farmers he supports federal
mandates to make nine billion gallons (34 billion liters) of
ethanol to use as fuel this year.
«It takes 77 million years to make fossil fuels and 45 minutes to use as a coffee cup,» says Cereplast's Scheer, noting that his industry can use the residue of government -
mandated production of biofuels, such as
ethanol from corn.
Market - based principles should guide policymakers away
from top - down, government -
mandated ventures such as the flawed Renewable Fuel Standard — which could force higher
ethanol blend fuels into the national supply, potentially damaging vehicle engines and saddling consumers with repair costs.
I believe the
mandate from the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 is to use 35 billion gallons of
ethanol by 2022.
Last week the EPA dismissed a petition by the American Petroleum Institute seeking relief
from the cellulosic
ethanol mandate, which requires that oil refiners blend 8.65 million gallons of
ethanol into the fuel supply by the end of 2012:
Also of interest is the political reason why the
ethanol mandate is so hard to get rid of: Rural Republican districts benefit hugely
from the market distortion and some alt - fuel fanatics in D.C, such as Obama, love to stick it to the oil companies regardless of environmental impact.
From 2007 to 2013, corn ethanol interests spent $ 158 million lobbying for more mandates and subsidies — and $ 6 million in campaign contributions — for a fuel that reduces mileage, damages engines, requires enormous amounts of land, water and fertilizer, and from stalk to tailpipe emits more carbon dioxide than gasol
From 2007 to 2013, corn
ethanol interests spent $ 158 million lobbying for more
mandates and subsidies — and $ 6 million in campaign contributions — for a fuel that reduces mileage, damages engines, requires enormous amounts of land, water and fertilizer, and
from stalk to tailpipe emits more carbon dioxide than gasol
from stalk to tailpipe emits more carbon dioxide than gasoline.
The
ethanol industry, already reeling
from a draft plan for cuts in the
ethanol mandate for this year, will now face more pressure as everyone
from conservatives and environmental activists...
Since the inception of the
ethanol mandate a decade ago, the United States has undergone an energy transformation
from a nation of energy dependence and scarcity to one of energy security and abundance.
Mandating ethanol now diverts 50 % of the US corn crop to fuel
from food.
The fierce opposition comes chiefly
from the U.S. environmental lobby, which has awakened to one of the most colossal environmental mistakes in its history: the
ethanol mandate, part of America's Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), which effectively
mandates that 10 per cent of gasoline at the pump consists of
ethanol.
The United States provides a range of incentives for
ethanol production including exclusion
from excise taxes,
mandating clean air performance requirements that created markets for
ethanol, and tax incentives and accelerated depreciation schedules for electricity generating equipment that burn biomass (USDOE, 2005).
William Astley says: March 10, 2012 at 1:56 am ---- snip --- The Clean Energy Scam The U.S. quintupled its production of
ethanol — ethyl alcohol, a fuel distilled
from plant matter — in the past decade, and Washington has just
mandated another fivefold increase in renewable fuels over the next decade.
The Clean Energy Scam The U.S. quintupled its production of
ethanol — ethyl alcohol, a fuel distilled
from plant matter — in the past decade, and Washington has just
mandated another fivefold increase in renewable fuels over the next decade.
Robert Zubrin thinks the United States can break free
from the grip of Middle East oil - producing countries by immediately
mandating that all cars sold in this country be «flex - fuel vehicles,» capable of running on gasoline,
ethanol or methanol.
Ironically, Clinton's proposal could actually hurt many rural farmers by shifting the
mandate from corn - based
ethanol to advanced biofuels that aren't derived
from corn.
New EPA Chief Scott Pruitt and the rest of the Trump economic team need to recognize that the RSF point of obligation and the
ethanol mandate tax actually represent a net loss to the economy, subtracting
from growth.
NERA set up its study that way for good reasons: Despite abundant evidence that RFS
mandates for ever - increasing
ethanol use in the nation's fuel supply are detached
from reality, and although it's pretty clear EPA has mismanaged the RFS to the detriment of those obligated to meet its
mandates — the
ethanol industry insists that the program continue as statutorily set out in 2007.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is considering scaling back legal requirements on the use of
ethanol next year amid complaints
from refiners that statutory
mandates would exceed their ability to blend it into fuels without putting engines at risk.
To square this circle, Congress
mandated that
ethanol from cellulose feedstocks contribute at least 16 billion gallons by 2022.
The European Union
mandates that
ethanol distilled primarily
from palm oil and wheat, constitute an increasing percentage of the fuel supply, ultimately 10 % by 2020.
So, EPA is aiming at restricting ozone
from industrialization, while our government policy simultaneously (and perhaps even unintentionally) increases overall ozone levels through a
mandate for
ethanol use.
At issue is whether to suspend a five - year - old federal
mandate requiring more
ethanol in gasoline each year, a policy that has diverted almost half of the domestic corn supply
from animal feedlots to
ethanol refineries, driven up corn prices and plantings and created a desperate competition for corn as drought grips the nation's farm belt.
The 2007
ethanol mandates called for the consumption of
ethanol to rise
from 0.6 MMB / D to 2.35 MMB / D by 2022 (left scale on Fig. 1).
It will reduce the 2014
mandated requirement
from 18.15 billion gallons of
ethanol to about 15 billion gallons.
Canada to
Mandate 5 %
Ethanol in Gasoline by 2010 Venture Capital is Shifting
from Creating Clean Power to Energy Conservation
Current
mandates call for blends of renewables on the order of 10 - 20 % - a far cry
from replacing gas with
ethanol.
The EPA announced yesterday that it would open a 30 day commenting period as it weighs requests
from multiple state governors to use provisions in the Clean Air Act to temporarily suspend the corn
ethanol mandate under the Renewable Fuel Standard:
Unfortunately, this doesn't stop RFA
from cherry - picking data to create «facts» that support ever - increasing use of
ethanol despite real data that strongly argues the
ethanol mandates under the Renewable Fuel Standard could negatively impact consumers and the broader economy.
For the 2014
mandates, EPA has proposed 17 million gallons of cellulosic
ethanol — with up to nine million gallons to come
from KiOR, which is now again looking highly unlikely.