Canada currently maintains a 5 % domestic
ethanol mandate on use while the U.S. is working towards a target of 136 billion liters of biofuels blended into transportation fuels by 2022.
Not exact matches
But one industry group —
ethanol producers — is noting Pruitt's past differences with Trump
on another hot - button EPA issue: the law that
mandates the use of the crop - based gasoline additive.
The reason a listening tour is the next step, and not a pre-packaged batch of legislation or other steps, is to build
on the common ground across a wide range of Americans
on energy thrift, innovation and fair play (meaning policies that distort the playing field, with
mandated corn
ethanol production and tax breaks for fossil fuel companies prime examples).
As Coral Davenport reported in a piece that ran
on Sunday, the power of the
ethanol mandate is waning for a variety of reasons — some national, but others within Iowa's boundaries:
As Coral Davenport reported in a piece that ran
on Sunday, the power of the
ethanol mandate is waning for a variety of reasons — some national, but others within Iowa's boundaries: Read more...
It's practically an entry - level badge for wonkhood
on left and right to understand that
ethanol mandates are environmentally damaging and economically inefficient and a textbook example of misguided environmental policy captured by special interests.
Instead, the
ethanol boys get to keep the
mandate on the books for the future, deterring capacity investment in non-
ethanol additive production and keeping the whole racket going forever.
If
ethanol were cheaper and people were voluntarily putting it in their gas (though why the
mandate on the gas is there isn't 100 % clear), great.
We have wasted billions of dollars
on such «strong» policies as coal - derived synfuels; subsidies for the commercialization of wind, solar and electric cars; and worst of all, the
ethanol mandate.
One item
on the President's schedule today is a meeting to discuss
ethanol mandates and the Renewable Fuel Standard.
The Fill Up
On Facts website is a great resource on the RFS, ethanol mandates and related issue
On Facts website is a great resource
on the RFS, ethanol mandates and related issue
on the RFS,
ethanol mandates and related issues.
Information is available
on the RFS itself, as well as problems that have made the program and its
ethanol mandates untenable — like the refining «blend wall,» potential risks to vehicle and equipment engines and impacts
on food prices.
The politics of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and its
mandates for ever - increasing
ethanol use are
on display this weekend in Iowa, a key presidential primary state.
Ironically, using CAFE to decrease consumption while increasing the
ethanol mandate will also have a significant impact
on how much bang consumers get for their buck at the pump in terms of gas mileage.
Robert Zubrin thinks the United States can break free from the grip of Middle East oil - producing countries by immediately
mandating that all cars sold in this country be «flex - fuel vehicles,» capable of running
on gasoline,
ethanol or methanol.
There's just one problem: Despite Washington's
mandates — which fall
on refiners and producers of motor fuels like ExxonMobil — cellulosic
ethanol doesn't actually exist in any meaningful volumes.
To make sure demand for
ethanol will grow substantially, the association wants a federal
mandate that all carmakers receiving federal aid would make only cars that can run
on a blend of up to 85 percent
ethanol, starting with the 2010 models.
First, restrictions
on trade are not normally good, but the fact that much of
ethanol consumption is due to the renewable fuel standard
mandate (and not market forces) complicates things.
«The Toomey - Feinstein partial repeal would make the RFS even more burdensome for Americans because it will focus the
mandate on costly phantom fuels like cellulosic
ethanol.
Corn
ethanol does not need the
mandate to survive in the market, and doing away with only the implied - corn
ethanol part of the program would make the
mandate worse by focusing it
on expensive «advanced» biofuels.
But, as the failed US experience with the
mandated and highly subsidized corn
ethanol program has shown, this has negative side effects
on overall farmland utilization and corn prices worldwide.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is considering scaling back legal requirements
on the use of
ethanol next year amid complaints from refiners that statutory
mandates would exceed their ability to blend it into fuels without putting engines at risk.
Back in 2007, states passed renewable portfolio standards at the same time the George W. Bush Administration was patting itself
on the back for enacting the renewable fuels standard — aka the
ethanol mandate.
The agency is currently working
on regulations for the oil and gas sector, and is finalizing new annual regulations for the nation's
ethanol mandate and renewable fuel blending requirements.
Trump is weak
on ethanol mandates and pretty good
on most other issues.
The 2007
ethanol mandates called for the consumption of
ethanol to rise from 0.6 MMB / D to 2.35 MMB / D by 2022 (left scale
on Fig. 1).
Current
mandates call for blends of renewables
on the order of 10 - 20 % - a far cry from replacing gas with
ethanol.