This research shows that on average, corn
ethanol produces emissions 51 % lower than gasoline.
Not exact matches
An assessment paid for by DuPont said that the
ethanol it will
produce there could be more than 100 per cent better than gasoline in terms of greenhouse gas
emissions.
«Corn - based
ethanol, instead of
producing a 20 percent savings [in greenhouse gas
emissions], nearly doubles greenhouse
emissions over 30 years and increases greenhouse gases for 167 years,» the researchers write.
Using corn to
produce ethanol has driven up food prices in recent years, and converting forests and other areas into farmland to grow more corn for biofuels may well negate
ethanol's improved greenhouse gas
emissions (GHG).
The fuel, which supposedly
produces less volatile organic compound (VOC)
emissions than regular diesel fuel or
ethanol, is being
produced by RenTech in Rialto, California.
All such «life cycle» studies attempt to estimate all the carbon
emissions created by
producing and burning
ethanol, including carbon released from soil by plowing and from fuel burned in planting, harvesting and refining.
And there was this: «By using a worldwide agricultural model to estimate
emissions from land - use change,» Timothy Searchinger of Princeton and other researchers reported in 2008, «we found that corn - based
ethanol, instead of
producing a 20 percent savings, nearly doubles greenhouse
emissions over 30 years and increases greenhouse gases for 167 years.»
It cited «plausible scenarios in which GHG [greenhouse gas]
emissions from corn - grain
ethanol are much higher than those of petroleum - based fuels,» and questioned the method by which EPA determined that
ethanol would
produce 21 percent less
emissions.
California's LCFS also would have little or no impact on GHG
emissions nationwide and would harm our nation's energy security by discouraging the use of Canadian crude oil — our nation's largest source of crude — and
ethanol produced in the American Midwest.
They promote spending $ 22 billion just in federal money during FY - 2014 on climate change studies; costly solar projects of every description; wind turbines that blight scenic vistas and slaughter millions of birds and bats annually, while wind energy developers are exempted from endangered species and other environmental laws that apply to all other industries; and
ethanol programs that require millions of acres of farmland and vast quantities of water, fertilizer, pesticides and fossil fuel energy to
produce a gasoline additive that reduces mileage, harms engines, drives up food prices... and increases CO2
emissions.
A few recent studies still claim that corn
ethanol produces fewer
emissions than gasoline, but a careful look reveals that their methods don't properly account for land use change.
«The biofuels researcher Timothy Searchinger has calculated that once the massive release of greenhouse gases cause by converting grassland and rainforest into cropland is taken into account, introduction of biofuels
produces increases in greenhouse
emissions, the size of the rise being as much as a doubling for corn
ethanol production,» Montford tells us.
However, Joe Romm pointed out that though «as a matter of science the deal is not optimal,» the end effect of this compromise is slight, noting that most of the corn
ethanol produced under the 2007 energy bill was already grandfathered in and would not have to meet these
emissions requirements.
Biofuels»
Emissions Benefits Often Overstated Citing the study, Reuters reports that, «The OECD said that if Brazil's ethanol produced from sugar cane cuts greenhouse gas emissions by around 80 %, biofuels from other feedstocks in the United States, the EU or Canada tend to have a far lower environmental
Emissions Benefits Often Overstated Citing the study, Reuters reports that, «The OECD said that if Brazil's
ethanol produced from sugar cane cuts greenhouse gas
emissions by around 80 %, biofuels from other feedstocks in the United States, the EU or Canada tend to have a far lower environmental
emissions by around 80 %, biofuels from other feedstocks in the United States, the EU or Canada tend to have a far lower environmental benefit.
In passing the Act, Congress intended to replace 30 percent of petroleum vehicle fuel use with alternative fuels by 2010, through federal purchase of less polluting vehicles, and by harnessing the purchasing power of the federal government to spur the market for natural gas, propane,
ethanol and electric vehicles, which
produce less pollution and greenhouse gas
emissions.
Alternative fueled vehicles are powered by natural gas, propane,
ethanol, or electricity, which
produce less pollution and greenhouse gas
emissions than petroleum fueled vehicles.
Most
ethanol produced in the United States is currently derived from corn, a relatively poor feedstock given its low yield and high fertilizer requirements which have been linked to water pollution, the expanded «dead zone» in the Gulf of Mexico, and significant greenhouse gas
emissions.