Corn - based ethanol doesn't meet that test and won't benefit from the new standard, CARB says, because diverting corn into
ethanol production increases deforestation and the clearing of grasslands.
Ethanol production increased dramatically in the 1970s and 1980s.
Not exact matches
«The uses for corn in
ethanol production coupled with drought conditions throughout the Midwest growing regions have led to dramatic price
increases affecting everything from prepared foods to animal feed for our dairy and meat products,» he states.
The explanation for the hefty price of free - range eggs has something to do with the dynamics of
increased corn
production for
ethanol and the resulting decrease in
production of other less expensive feed.
By applying this new technology to enzymes required for the
production of
ethanol — an important biofuel — the researchers were able to
increase alcohol
production by over 200 %.
Searchinger's outlook is bleaker: He estimates that the rise in corn - based
ethanol production in the United States would
increase greenhouse gases, relative to what our current, fossil - fuel - based economy produces, for 167 years.
In the second study, Timothy Searchinger, a researcher at Princeton University, looked at a future scenario in which the United States substantially
increases its
production of corn - based
ethanol, a move that would decrease domestic crops for food and feedstock.
Future harvest of corn stover for cellulosic
ethanol production would
increase erosion (i.e. sedimentation) and nutrient loads from corn land, they said.
A massive expansion of land use for sugar cane growth in Brazil, and a subsequent
increase in
ethanol production with the feedstock could reduce global carbon dioxide emissions in the transportation sector by up to 86 percent of 2014 levels, according to research published in the October issue of the journal Nature Climate Change.
As you drink and force your body to metabolize alcohol, you're converting
ethanol into acetaldehyde and acetate in your liver, and this causes
increased production of tiny blood vessel constrictors called thromboxanes.
Ethanol increases urine
production, and therefore dehydrates us.
Ethanol makers experienced improved financial performance because of changes out of their control - as in the case of natural gas prices falling drastically in response to
increased fracking for natural gas
production - but lost money because of
increased corn prices caused by escalating Chinese grain demand.
Corn
production has
increased to meet the demand from
ethanol.
Since 2008,
ethanol production has
increased by 33 percent.
In anticipation of
increased ethanol requirements the RIN cost skyrocketed because there is limited
production capacity due to the wording of the mandate which is the RFS.
Sure,
increased ethanol production might cause atrazine levels in drinking wells to
increase, but it's in someone else's water.
Fittingly, President Obama today was at Georgetown University, where he outlined a broad initiative to cut oil imports, boost domestic
production of oil and gas, and
increase the use of cellulosic
ethanol and natural gas to power vehicles.
It shows that the Troika
increases annual corn
ethanol production by only 5.2 billion gallons in 2015.
``...
production and use of
ethanol as fuel to displace gasoline is likely to
increase such air pollutants as particulate matter, ozone, and sulfur oxides.»
Throw in more competition for these same crops due to an
increase in
ethanol production and you have a recipe for higher gas prices, higher food prices and even possibly shortages of one, the other, or both.
The report warned that
increasing production of liquid biofuels, such as
ethanol and biodiesel, could
increase the price of agricultural commodities with negative economic and social impacts, especially for the world's poor who spend a large proportion of income on food.
By comparison The US oil consumption
increased by 137.6 million barrels from 6851.4 mmbbls in 2009 to 6989.0 mmbbls in 2010 so this
ethanol production did not stop the
increase in US oil consumption and only served to raise the price of corn through government subsidies affecting only the poor.
We acknowledged the bee situation in a post nearly a year ago, noting that the large - scale conversion of grasslands to grow crops for a number of uses was crowding out bees, butterflies and others — including
increasing acreage being devoted to
ethanol production.
«The biofuels researcher Timothy Searchinger has calculated that once the massive release of greenhouse gases cause by converting grassland and rainforest into cropland is taken into account, introduction of biofuels produces
increases in greenhouse emissions, the size of the rise being as much as a doubling for corn
ethanol production,» Montford tells us.
In 2007 26 % of the US corn
production has diverted to create biofuel with a 7 % net
increase in carbon dioxide emitted if one includes the energy cost for fertilizer, to harvest the corn, to haul the corn to the biofuel plants, and to triple distil the
ethanol.
William Astley says: March 10, 2012 at 1:56 am ---- snip --- The Clean Energy Scam The U.S. quintupled its
production of
ethanol — ethyl alcohol, a fuel distilled from plant matter — in the past decade, and Washington has just mandated another fivefold
increase in renewable fuels over the next decade.
Rather than subsiding the
production of corn based
ethanol the same money can be used to preserve and
increase rainforest.
The Clean Energy Scam The U.S. quintupled its
production of
ethanol — ethyl alcohol, a fuel distilled from plant matter — in the past decade, and Washington has just mandated another fivefold
increase in renewable fuels over the next decade.
We're supposed to believe that
ethanol has conferred a giant boon on consumers even though gasoline prices have
increased as
ethanol production has
increased, and even though gas prices hit their all - time high when
ethanol production hit its all - time high.
Because of this policy,
ethanol production now consumes approximately 40 percent of the U.S. corn crop, and the cost of corn for use in food
production has
increased by 193 percent since 2005 [the year before the RFS took effect].
The U.S. and other countries passed legislation that provides incentives for the
increased production of biofuels (e.g.
ethanol, etc.).
During the period under evaluation by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, America's Soviet - style
production quota for
ethanol, a motor fuel distilled from corn,
increased almost 4 billion gallons, or 104 billion pounds of maize.
Ethanol's use as an oxygenate to control carbon monoxide emissions, encouraged
increased production of the fuel through the decade and into the 1990s.»
One rationale for
ethanol production in the U.S. is
increased energy security, from shifting supply from oil imports to domestic sources.
On the other hand, 75 percent expressed concern about government requirements that would
increase the amount of
ethanol in gasoline, while 72 percent oppose higher taxes that could decrease investment in energy
production and reduce energy development.
The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) has
increased ethanol production by about 400,000 barrels per day (bbl / d) since 2000.
A «remarkably small operational adjustment» in refineries» product mix — a 1.8 %
increase in gasoline
production — could have covered an
ethanol shortfall of 400,000 bbl / d in 2011.
U.S.
ethanol production shot up by more than 3 billion gallons (150 %) between 2001 and 2006, and corn
production increased 11 %, while total U.S. harvested cropland fell by about 2 % in the same period.
The food group is suing because, as a result of EPA's E15 waiver,
ethanol production will
increase and demand for corn (a necessary raw material for
ethanol) will rise significantly.
Increases in
ethanol production since 2007 have made little, or no, contribution to U.S. energy supplies, or dependence on foreign crude oil.
The CARD researchers, Xiaodong Du and Dermot Hayes, attempt to determine the consumer benefit of
ethanol by inferring what motor fuel prices would have been over the past decade had there been no
increase in
ethanol production.
Over a year ago, the U.S. Congress passed a law requiring massive
increases in the
production of
ethanol and other biofuels.
Reasonable questions are being raised regarding the sustainability of corn - based
ethanol, and even 2nd generation industrial plantation based biofuel and biochar
production; given finite land, fertilizers and water, and in the face of exponential
increases in population and demand for energy.
Another important question she takes on is the extent to which corn - based
ethanol production could be
increased.
While Vogel acknowledges that it will be difficult to set up «large - scale field trials... particularly for an extended period of time in a large geographical area,» he believes the 540 % figure could be
increased further with better land management and breeding techniques and with improvements in cellulosic
ethanol production technologies.
And let's not forget some of the harmful biological and environmental impacts incurred by a shift to more
ethanol production: huge use of water,
increased soil erosion, more fertilizer use and more herbicide / pesticide use.
Also please feel free to weigh in with your recommendations and / or concerns about the
increased production of corn - based
ethanol.
Concurrently they can
increase the
ethanol yield going from 285 gal / acre to 475 by
increasing corn
production
Since cellulosic
ethanol is created by using all of the parts of the plant being used (instead of the 10 %, mainly the edible part, of the plant), in all likelihood, if this process turns out to work as advertised, we could use the discarded parts of corn, or non-edible plants such as switchgrass, so food
production would not have to be drastically
increased.
He also reserved criticism for the recently enacted energy law, which calls for a fivefold
increase in biofuel
production by 2022, stating that its promotion of corn
ethanol would lead people to «starve to death in parts of the world» as a result of rising food prices.