CARD claims that from January 2000 to December 2011, «the growth in
ethanol production reduced wholesale gasoline prices by $ 0.29 per gallon on average across all regions,» and that in 2011 ethanol lowered gasoline prices by a whopping $ 1.09 per gallon.
Not exact matches
(Worse, use of
ethanol instead of gasoline does little to
reduce net carbon emissions once the energy - intensive full cycle of
ethanol production — including the energy - intensive fertilizer and transport needs — is taken into account.)
Farmers make the fuel by chemically treating corn kernels to isolate the sugars and then feeding the sugars to yeast, which digests them and secretes
ethanol.Not only do the corn husks and stalks go to waste, but
ethanol production has driven up the price of the corn that is used for food by
reducing its availability.
A massive expansion of land use for sugar cane growth in Brazil, and a subsequent increase in
ethanol production with the feedstock could
reduce global carbon dioxide emissions in the transportation sector by up to 86 percent of 2014 levels, according to research published in the October issue of the journal Nature Climate Change.
To
reduce costs, we recommend regional concentration of E85 blends for future
ethanol production and use.
The key factors determining carbon emissions for corn - based
ethanol are (1) whether coal or natural gas is used to power the
ethanol plant, (2) whether distillers grains are dried or sold wet, and (3) whether expansion of corn acreage comes mainly from
reduced acreage of lower - value crops or if idled land is brought into
production.
For now, setting aside acreage and letting it return to native vegetation was rated the best way to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions, outweighing the results of corn -
ethanol production over the first 48 years.
It's now well - established that large - scale U.S.
production of biofuels such as
ethanol from corn has accomplished little or nothing (or even negative) in its stated goals of
reducing oil dependence and cutting emissions of greenhouse gases, and has functioned instead as a full - employment program for agribusiness (and a political
production racket for Iowa and other corn - growing states).
Bolsen predicted that cellulosic
ethanol production processes will become increasingly efficient at
reducing carbon emissions.
Finally,
ethanol production and the RFS don't even
reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Even the International Institute for Sustainable Development has acknowledged that
ethanol production does not
reduce atmospheric CO2.
On the other hand, 75 percent expressed concern about government requirements that would increase the amount of
ethanol in gasoline, while 72 percent oppose higher taxes that could decrease investment in energy
production and
reduce energy development.
An
ethanol production mandate could be in conflict with efforts to
reduce the Gulf Coast dead zone.
The use of the renewable fuels in
ethanol production will tend to give corn - based
ethanol a more positive energy balance and will
reduce the use of fossil fuels.