Increases in
ethanol production since 2007 have made little, or no, contribution to U.S. energy supplies, or dependence on foreign crude oil.
In fact, cumulative new
ethanol production since 2005 has accounted for 62 % of new domestically - produced liquid fuels, while cumulative new U.S. crude oil production has accounted for 38 %.
Not exact matches
Since then, corn
ethanol production has more than doubled to about 36.5 million gallons per day — meaning
ethanol already is nearly 10 percent of U.S. fuel supply.
Since transportation and storage of biomass add to the overall
production cost if the materials aren't located near the biofuels facility, agricultural areas are the best location for renewable biomass to be used in
ethanol production.
These findings have significance for human health but also for biofuels
production,
since the same sugars can be fed to yeast to generate
ethanol and other liquid fuels.
Ethanol production has boomed in the U.S.
since the late 2000s, largely due to heavy government subsidies.
«
Since 2000, global wind energy generation has more than tripled; solar cell
production has risen six-fold;
production of fuel
ethanol from crops have more than doubled; and biodiesel
production has expanded nearly four-fold.
Non-conventional liquids
production has reached ~ 4.5 Mbbl / d
since 1960, which includes EOR, oil sands, CTL, GTL,
ethanol, biodiesel.
This will require some technological breakthroughs
since the
production of
ethanol from such sources as switch grass require the use of cellulosic enzymes whose economical
production has not been perfected yet.
Since 2008,
ethanol production has increased by 33 percent.
Ethanol production has expanded and the U.S. has been a net exporter of ethanol sinc
Ethanol production has expanded and the U.S. has been a net exporter of
ethanol sinc
ethanol since 2010.
Since the ESA forbids the Federal Government from funding any activities which might harm a listed species, why not sue to prevent the ridiculous Federal subsidies on
Ethanol, on the grounds that the production, distribution, and use of ethanol have a net negative impact on carbon dioxide emissions when compared with petroleum products, thus accelerating global warming and further endangering the polar
Ethanol, on the grounds that the
production, distribution, and use of
ethanol have a net negative impact on carbon dioxide emissions when compared with petroleum products, thus accelerating global warming and further endangering the polar
ethanol have a net negative impact on carbon dioxide emissions when compared with petroleum products, thus accelerating global warming and further endangering the polar bears.
Because of this policy,
ethanol production now consumes approximately 40 percent of the U.S. corn crop, and the cost of corn for use in food
production has increased by 193 percent
since 2005 [the year before the RFS took effect].
Wayne Hoovestol, Chief Executive Officer said: «Algae is potentially a by - product of
ethanol that makes the process cleaner and greener through carbon sequestration... Algae
production fits into Green Plains» business model
since we are already in the business of marketing biofuel and feed products.»
The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) has increased
ethanol production by about 400,000 barrels per day (bbl / d)
since 2000.
Ethanol production has been growing at breakneck speed
since President Bush announced his goal of decreasing the nation's dependence on foreign oil through his Advanced Energy Initiative last year.
And the International Monetary Fund has documented that
since their peak in July 2008, oil prices declined by 69 % as of December 2008, and global food prices declined by 33 % during the same period, while U.S. corn
production has remained at 12 billion bushels a month, one - third of which is still used for
ethanol production.
This reflects the reality that approximately 40 percent of the corn crop now goes into
ethanol production, a dramatic rise
since the first
ethanol mandates were put in place in 2005.
Since cellulosic
ethanol is created by using all of the parts of the plant being used (instead of the 10 %, mainly the edible part, of the plant), in all likelihood, if this process turns out to work as advertised, we could use the discarded parts of corn, or non-edible plants such as switchgrass, so food
production would not have to be drastically increased.