Sentences with phrase «ethical climate scientist»

(Apologizes to those honest and ethical climate scientist who have been lumped into the «97 %» who are just trying to figure out what is really going on.)

There should be outrage by ethical climate scientists everywhere.

However, I feel that is unethical to make public the stolen private emails of hardworking, ethical climate scientists.

Not exact matches

The climate scientist Simon Donner, who joined Gleick in signing a recent letter to The Wall Street Journal rebutting an op - ed article by other scientists questioning the seriousness of global warming, weighed in on the downside of lowering ethical thresholds in the name of a worthy mission:

If the Authors «want to examine... loci at which scientific knowledge is made,» Why not just say what we already know as «virtually certain»: the ipcc's method is almost exclusively «computer - simulated climate science» = gigo; «Expertly» guided by demonizing CO2 and disasterizing Global Warming and spurred onward always by the ethical maxim that «We «mainstream» Climate Scientists are all gonna die from Green Back Starvation Syndrome if we don't gin up some more demonizing and disasterizing «Climate Science» before it's too late!&climate science» = gigo; «Expertly» guided by demonizing CO2 and disasterizing Global Warming and spurred onward always by the ethical maxim that «We «mainstream» Climate Scientists are all gonna die from Green Back Starvation Syndrome if we don't gin up some more demonizing and disasterizing «Climate Science» before it's too late!&Climate Scientists are all gonna die from Green Back Starvation Syndrome if we don't gin up some more demonizing and disasterizing «Climate Science» before it's too late!&Climate Science» before it's too late!»?

Ben Santer Scientists» Leaked Correspondence Illustrates Bitter Feud over Global Warming By Keith Johnson The scientific community is buzzing over thousands of emails and documents — posted on the Internet last week after being hacked from a prominent climate - change research center — that some say raise ethical questions about a group of scientists who contendScientists» Leaked Correspondence Illustrates Bitter Feud over Global Warming By Keith Johnson The scientific community is buzzing over thousands of emails and documents — posted on the Internet last week after being hacked from a prominent climate - change research center — that some say raise ethical questions about a group of scientists who contendscientists who contend -LSB-...]

As I stated in the main post, my personal ethical conflicts in context of the climate debate have been resolved by choosing to focus on my responsibilities as a scientist as outlined by the NRC report.

Climate change is not just an issue for scientists, politicians and activists — but for everyone with an ethical conscience.

Ethical scientist don't stop making a best estimate or climate sensitivity withou clearly explaining why and the implications for the projections made by climate models.

I think those of us who are truly concerned with the output of some climate scientists are much more interested in the looking at ethical and potential advocacy biases of the matter than seeing Mann punished or reprimanded.

Is it ethical for a climate scientists to discuss scientific uncertainty in mainstream forums?

Conclusion The third entry in this series will examine additional tactics in the climate change disinformation campaign that will include; manufacturing bogus science, think tank campaigns, misleading PR campaigns, the use of Astroturf groups, and cyber-bullying scientists and journalists The last entry in the series will identify ethical norms that should guide climate skeptics in light of the experience with the climate change disinformation campaign discussed in this series..

I believe that the majority of climate scientists do feel personally comfortable that their work is ethical.

I would now posit that ethical cowardice and immaturity will be defined by the critics of Mann et al, and the decent work of scientist in global climate change

When I started Climate Etc., John was one of the few climate scientists that contacted me, sharing concerns about various ethical issues in ourClimate Etc., John was one of the few climate scientists that contacted me, sharing concerns about various ethical issues in ourclimate scientists that contacted me, sharing concerns about various ethical issues in our field.

What will save us is the ethical transformation of our society,» said Carmelite Father Eduardo Agosta Scarel, a climate scientist who teaches at the Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina in Buenos Aires.

Climate scientists could perform their research, provide it to policy makers and then walk away as their job is not to speculate or create public policy but to perform research in an unbiased and ethical fashion.

The Smithsonian has opened an investigation into the ethical conduct of Willie Soon, one of its part time scientists and a climate - change skeptic who is facing scrutiny for failing to properly disclose his work was funded by fossil fuel interests.

Yet, Dr. Bengsston, who by all accounts is an exemplary and ethical scientist, is the one facing widespread opprobrium among climate scientists merely for joining an «academic advisory» council.

«New documents reveal Koch, Exxon, Southern Company influence behind climate change denier scientist Dr. Willie Soon called his research and congressional testimony «deliverables» to corporate funders, may have violated IRS rules and scientific journals» ethical guidelines,» Greenpeace (Media Release), February 23, 2015.

On Feb. 23, the Smithsonian opened an investigation into the ethical conduct of Willie Soon, one of its part time scientists and a climate skeptic who has failed to disclose funding from fossil fuel companies in papers he published.

From a budgeting perspective, it really isn't a good time for federal climate scientists to be having legal / ethical problems.

In ethical terms we see another example of a climate scientist who holds a strong ethical commitment to the policy dimension of climate change and its associated end of shaping public opinion and behaviour, appearing to prioritise the pursuit of those ends above the narrower moral codes of scientific discovery.

However, Schneider's words in 1989 have served as an invitation to climate scientists to dilute or violate the ethics of scientific practice while — and this is important to grasp — viewing their actions as ethical because of a desire to make the world a better place.

The two approaches that will be used in making ethical assessments in the sections to follow attach different levels of importance to the «ends» or outcomes that are being pursued — say, saving the world from climate - induced disaster — and the «means» adopted by scientists, activists, vested interests and politicians in the process.

We can think up circumstances where it might not be practical, or even ethical, for a scientist to tell the whole truth, but I am sure you will agree that the communication of climate science to the public and to policy makers is not in that realm.

Climate scientists face an ethical choice: do they conform to established ethical standards of scientific practice or do they sacrifice those standards in favour of actions and statements that will be more likely to shape public opinion and climate policy in their preferred dirClimate scientists face an ethical choice: do they conform to established ethical standards of scientific practice or do they sacrifice those standards in favour of actions and statements that will be more likely to shape public opinion and climate policy in their preferred dirclimate policy in their preferred direction?

It was not in the measuring, calculating and experimenting that the moral codes of science were violated, it was in the politicising of scientific actions, as historical scientific disinterestedness was sacrificed in what was intended by some, perhaps many, climate scientists as the pursuit of a noble, ethical cause.

A scientist who advocates policies to reduce emissions — really the only ethical action for someone who understands the science — and / or a scientist who is part of a team that actually makes climate projections — is inherently biased?