Not exact matches
Because the lawyer has an
ethical duty to keep Mrs. X's information confidential, the lawyer's
obligation to Mrs. X «materially limits» the lawyer's representation
of the
party adverse to her.
There were 11 allegations which included that he circumvented the terms
of a British Columbia Supreme Court order and attempted to mislead the court; he breached his
ethical obligations by receiving funds from an individual and disbursing them for the benefit
of a client without advising the individual that his interests were not being protected; and he represented
parties in a B.C. Supreme Court action despite a conflict
of interest.
Though the Canadian Judicial Council in its Statement
of Principles did not explicitly refer to the hazards
of sharp lawyering when dealing with an unrepresented
party, it nevertheless advised that «Members
of the Bar are expected to be respectful
of self - represented persons and to adjust their behavior... in accordance with their professional
ethical obligations.»
Attorneys have an
ethical obligation to put their clients» interests ahead
of all other
parties.
And we have a core
ethical obligation in the dispute resolution field that we're going to protect the confidentiality
of the information our
parties share.
Freed from the role
of acting as an advocate for a single
party (the
ethical obligation of an attorney), a mediator can envision options that neither
party (nor their counsel) imagined!