The dental assistant shall assume the responsibilities and
ethical obligations required to provide and promote quality oral health care and service.
If they are unwilling to discuss this possibility and are unwilling to tell you how to protect your child from complications, then they are not being honest with you and are violating a basic
ethical obligation required of all health providers.
Our vision is to find ways to serve clients better: to bring down costs so that real people can afford us (and so we are better than the competition); to practice our profession ethically, based on deep reflection about what
ethical obligations require of us in a changing world; and to do all of this while also living live good and fulfilled lives.
Not exact matches
Such refusal to amicably settle infringement of our trademark pursuant to the infringer's corporate responsibilities and public and
ethical obligations,
requires the consideration of costly legal action to enforce protection of our registration.
The FDA also has
ethical obligations to use the data from these post-market trials that it
requires, Faden and her colleagues argue.
If they sign up for a trial, however, they will be randomized into groups and
required to take one of the test therapies — especially if one is suspected to cause occasional severe side effects — «Now you've got this heightened
ethical obligation toward these people,» Faden says.
Ofqual also suggests exam boards draw up clear contractual arrangements setting out the
obligations of teachers, directly contact schools to emphasise the importance of
ethical practice and consequences of wrongdoing, and
require «annual declarations» from teacher - examiners that they are complying with
obligations to protect the confidentiality of assessment materials.
In addition, ethics
requires those engaged in dangerous behavior to understand the effects of their policy choices and respond to their
ethical obligations.
The undeniable truth is that the moral /
ethical obligation is for all of the most fortunate to lead the rapid increase of awareness and understanding of the corrections
required for the future of humanity and lead by example (discrediting and correcting «legal developments» when developed Laws and their enforcement are unethical / harmful, including exposing the awareness of unethical legal developments by disobeying through «civil disobedience»).
In the absence of a court adjudicating what equity
requires of nations in setting their national climate change commitments, a possibility but far from a guarantee under existing international and national law (for an explanation of some of the litigation issues, Buiti, 2011), the best hope for encouraging nations to improve the ambition of their national emissions reductions commitments on the basis of equity and justice is the creation of a mechanism under the UNFCCC that
requires nations to explain their how they quantitatively took equity into account in establishing their INDCs and why their INDC is consistent with the nation's
ethical obligations to people who are most vulnerable to climate change and the above principles of international law.
(See, Brown, 2011 for a discussion of specific practical consequences that follow from recognition that climate change is an
ethical problem) These consequences include that nations should commit to do what their
ethical responsibilities,
obligations, and duties
requires of them without regard to whether all other nations are agreeing to do so.
f. Nations should be
required to explain how their commitments to fund adaptation and losses and damages in poor vulnerable nations link to their
ethical obligations to provide funding.
A strong
ethical case can be made that if nations have duties to limit their ghg emissions to their fair share of safe global emissions, a conclusion that follows both as a matter of ethics and justice and several international legal principles including, among others, the «no harm principle,» and promises nations made in the 1992 UNFCCC to adopt policies and measures
required to prevent dangerous anthropocentric interference with the climate system in accordance with equity and common but differentiated responsibilities, nations have a duty to clearly explain how their national ghg emissions reductions commitments arguably satisfy their
ethical obligations to limit their ghg emissions to the nation's fair share of safe global emissions.
But my point is really this: exercising judgment as a citizen may not be constrained by law, but it is constrained by morality, and
ethical citizenry
requires compliance with one's moral
obligations.
Lawyers have
ethical obligations of candour which
require disclosure of information relevant to their retainer and disclosure of errors and omissions.
Like you, I believe that there are strategies the LSUC could pursue which would achieve their substantive goals, strategies which accurately reflect existing (and unambiguous) legal and
ethical obligations and which are consistent with constitutional requirements and principles (as I've noted above, if the current requirement around a Statement of Principle merely
required acknowledgement of our actual existing
obligations under the Rules, rather than a general duty to promote equality, diversity and inclusion which is found nowhere in the Rules, I suspect much opposition would melt away and the LSUC would be on far stronger Charter grounds).
However, these attorneys are held to the same
ethical rules and
obligations as traditional law offices, and there are some areas that
require close attention.
For example, many states
require that lawyers provide non-legal employees with instruction and supervision concerning the
ethical aspects of their employment, including
obligations not to disclose confidential information or work product.
A case such as this is difficult for a judge, because it
requires active case management and no assistance is being provided by counsel / solicitors, who are under an
ethical and professional
obligation to the court to assist it and to point out (gently) if the court is overlooking something.
Do we have an
ethical obligation to seek and obtain full disclosure when the Rules do not yet
require us to do so?
In addition to the legal principle of solicitor - client privilege and a lawyer's
ethical obligations with respect to confidential information contained in the Law Society of Alberta Code of Professional Conduct, Bishop & McKenzie LLP is
required to deal with personal information in compliance with Alberta's Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) and, when necessary, in compliance with the federal privacy law, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA).
As practicing lawyers we have a professional and
ethical obligation to keep confidential all information we receive within the lawyer - client relationship except as
required to carry out your instructions and fulfil our legal
obligations.
If a lawyer's compliance with his or her
ethical obligations is defined by his or her actions, what are the actions, then, that this purported duty
requires of us?
As practicing lawyers, we are subject to professional and
ethical obligations and we do not disclose personal information subject to solicitor - client privilege unless the privilege is lawfully waived or we are
required by law to do so.
The latter can be understood as
requiring lawyers not just to comply with their
ethical obligations but also to plan their affairs in a way that best ensures
ethical compliance.
Where an
ethical issue has arisen in the relationship, counsel may be
required to withdraw in order to comply with his or her professional
obligations.
Rest assured, that's a mistake, especially now that 31 states
require lawyers to maintain technology competence as part of their
ethical obligations, of which New York is one.
Unfortunately for the vast majority of membership in MLS systems whose systems have not simply altered the form to allow both the
Ethical and Practical
obligations in the Seller Listing Agreement to be fulfilled without addendum to the contract being
required, they have unknowingly been placed in serious trouble.
In addition to any
ethical obligation, most states have laws that
require real estate professionals to disclose the known history of a property.