Not exact matches
Hendrix et al: Moving on to section II, labeled Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), I am once again wondering how RCTs can be
ethically conducted to
study birthplace.
To get around that problem, this
study used the Bradford Hill criteria: a standard tool for assessing the impact of broad - based public health interventions where it is
ethically not feasible or operationally impractical to
conduct randomized controlled trials.
Limitations of the
study included the fact that interventions were routinely offered to women with a history of pregnancy loss or early preterm birth if a short cervix was detected, which may have influenced the pregnancy outcome and slightly reduced the predictive ability in this
study, but
ethically the
study could not be
conducted without providing some intervention.
In humans, because invasive
studies are not
ethically permissible except in some neurological patients, by far the largest number of EEG
studies have been
conducted using electrodes glued to the scalp.
All research is
conducted with explicit monitoring and mitigation requirements in order to ensure
studies are
conducted safely and
ethically while providing vitally needed information on understanding and managing the effects of noise on marine mammals.
Indeed — since a double - blind, placebo - controlled trial isn't
ethically possible in this situation, it is hard to
conduct a
study that's not without flaws.