In his 1984 presidential address to the Society of Christian Ethics, Tom Ogletree noted that most Christian
ethicists do not see their task as that of providing moral guidance for Christian congregations.
Not exact matches
In fact, as John Fletcher,
ethicist at the University of Virginia, has said, «You don't have to be religious to realize that there ought to be a debate about....
Mr. Doer flinger, summarizing Smith, writes that «modern secular bio ethics often sets itself against religion, and [Smith] even quotes
ethicist Daniel Callahan as saying that the «first thing» bioethics had to
do to establish itself was «to push religion aside.
Indeed, in a complex society where no one can grasp more than a few of the details, some of the most important practical theology will have to be
done by specialists in medicine, law or business, or by theologians and
ethicists whose training equips them for specialized roles in those institutions.
Still others, like the Aristotelian virtue
ethicists Alasdair MacIntyre and Stanley Hauerwas, worry that human beings who
do unpleasant deeds are more likely to
do them again.
Ethicists have always worried about «borderline situations,» in which clear rules
do not yield clear direction, or about the «perplexed conscience,» which leaves a person bewildered in the midst of difficult decisions.
I
did not become an
ethicist because my primary interest was social change or particular moral «issues.»
A very smart
ethicist from Harvard asks me, «Why
does America have to have a mission in the world any more than Luxembourg has to have a mission in the world?»
Ethicists today consider their area not just the normative task of what people ought to
do and why but also the analytic and descriptive enterprise of how and why people in fact
do act.
As a medical
ethicist, how
do you regard the use of triage in wartime and in emergency medical procedures?
But the influence of the cultural conditioning by this system is such that most universities and educational systems and even international lawyers,
ethicists and moral theologians
do not consider this aspect of the world injustice.
In this light, it is not the case that we would abandon a moral, religious, aesthetic or political life for a life of
doing logic, but rather, we would not leave the moral life to the
ethicists, the religious life to the theologians and customary religious practices, and the political life to the politicians and political scientists, just as we surely would not leave propositions in the hands of the logicians.4
Jewish
ethicists speak of the principle of bal tashchit, which means «
do not destroy.»
Because virtue
ethicists tend to trace their lineage back to Aristotle, when they discuss the connection between ethics and metaphysics they also tend to
do so in Aristotelian terms, specifically in terms of a natural teleology that tries to determine which functional properties are essential for a full human life.
Christian
ethicists usually have no great difficulty in admiring and even recommending these virtues, also in cases where they
do not fully or even partially endorse the theological and philosophical presuppositions of people who evince them (such as, for instance, Latin American Pentecostals, Muslim fundamentalists, or neo-Confucian businessmen).
Besides, theologians and
ethicists have to recognize that most of us
do not naturally have the perspective of the poor.
Unlike many ecological
ethicists and post-Christian feminists, she insists that humans
did not originally live lightly on the earth in harmonious, paradisiacal groups.
Furnish made these points in 1972, but this writer is not aware of much that has been
done since byprofessional
ethicists to make love more central to ethics.
I don't doubt there are safe and compassionate hospitals out there or even compassionate doctors in hospitals that generally aren't, but when a large portion of women are looking for homebirth because their hospital experiences were the antithesis of compassionate, these
ethicists need to be looking at what they are suggesting.
«We also retained independent
ethicist counsel to ensure that we were
doing everything correctly.
Dr. Salomon, who helped organize the workshop with Alan Langnas,
DO, of the University of Nebraska, noted that it is important to involve a wide range of stakeholders — including physicians and surgeons, government officials, patients and families,
ethicists, and legal scholars — in discussions on how to define that line.
Other
ethicists worry that fears of eugenics will be raised if testing can be
done for less - serious conditions.
Ethicists argue that «not a problem now» doesn't mean «never a problem.»
NSF doesn't necessarily know what a university is
doing, notes medical
ethicist Elizabeth Heitman of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, who co-authored a recently published study of how research - intensive universities are implementing the RCR mandate from NSF.
«The Good Egg» draws a link between the viability of the egg before conception and the intrinsic value of the embryo: «If, as some
ethicists argue, nascent life must be protected, how
do we assess the degree of moral entitlement due a nascent entity that fails to pass nature's own muster perhaps 80 percent of the time?»
«The report rightly identified governance as a critical issue but it
does not go far enough in advocating democratic engagement,» says Zahra Meghani, an
ethicist at the University of Rhode Island, Kingston.
But the idea of single - subject research didn't really make the leap to medicine of the body until the early 1980s when Gordon Guyatt, a Canadian physician now known as a founder of evidence - based medicine, began working in an interdisciplinary department at McMaster University in Ontario, with psychologists, biostatisticians,
ethicists and clinical epidemiologists all working together.
If, as some
ethicists argue, nascent life must be protected, how
do we assess the degree of moral entitlement due a nascent entity that fails to pass nature's own muster perhaps 80 percent of the time?
There's been a * bit * of discussion in regards to Randy Cohen, writer of the «
Ethicist» column at the New York Times who advised someone that had downloaded a pirated eBook of a Stephen King book he already owned that ethically he had
done an «okay» thing.
There are, however, only a few
ethicists who can
do this work well because it is an inherently nondisciplinary challenge and the
ethicists must be willing to dig into the scientific and economic controversies entailed by climate change as they unfold.
In other words, of all folks, really, responsible
ethicists and (practical) moral philosophers should be
doing whatever it takes, at this point, to bring about ethically sound ACTION.
Rather than judge right or wrong behavior on the basis of reason and what people should or should not
do, virtue
ethicists focus on the development of character or what people should be.
We are responsible not only for what we
do but also for what we could have prevented Peter Singer -
Ethicist.
For cybersecurity
ethicists, however, an ethical attorney is not just
doing one thing; they are in a constant state of evolution and growth to keep pace with threats and best practices.
So he asked The New York Times Magazine's
ethicist, Randy Cohen, what
do you think?
The first is that legal
ethicists (including me) tend to focus on the limits on lawyer conduct, on the things that lawyers ought not to
do when representing clients.
But when you talk to actual
ethicists, as Ricardo Bilton of Digiday
did, you'll learn that «questioning the ethics of ad blocking ignores that neither publishers nor their digital advertising partners are exactly on firm ethical ground either.»
Although
ethicists criticized the arrangement as falling short of the blind trusts set up by recent former presidents, Trump said he was
doing more than he had to and noted that an ethics law that applies to most executive branch officials exempts the president.