In his presentation, RI [Research Integrity] is a Mentoring Issue, Not a Lecture Course, Teitelbaum warned that if the number of
ethics courses increase and start to demand more time from trainees, that time will have to come «at the expense of other course subjects.»
Not exact matches
The open nature of the
course and the opportunity for students to actively participate
increased my interest in research
ethics.
Of
course, logic and
ethics had no chance when you were faced with defending it, since the Hockey Stick graph (the only one reproduced multiple times in color in any IPCC summary) was the primary basis for convincing the Media and Policy Makers that immediate action was needed to offset unprecedented warming, obviously caused by unprecedented
increase in CO2.
This basic - to - intermediate
course material is designed for Licensed Professional Counselors, Social Workers, Psychologists, Chemical Dependency Counselors, Marriage and Family Therapists, Nurses, and other allied healthcare professionals who are likely to gain professionally from
increased knowledge in the areas of
ethics and the management of violence threats in a therapeutic relationships.
This basic - to - intermediate
course material is designed for Licensed Professional Counselors, Social Workers, Psychologists, Chemical Dependency Counselors, Marriage and Family Therapists, Nurses, and other allied healthcare professionals who are likely to gain professionally from
increased knowledge in this subject area (
ethics and boundary issues).
There is no evidence that I am aware of in the regulatory or academic literature that states that the introduction of a mandatory
ethics course will reduce infractions... without
increased enforcement.
This is an ingrained negative reaction to compulsory
ethics courses where it creates
increased monitoring and accountability.