Not exact matches
At some point, Martin speculates, the bacterium gave the archaean a gene for membrane synthesis, leading to a bubbling up of membrane within the
host cell, something like what happens when modern
eukaryotes divide and then reform their nucleus from membrane pieces grown inside them.
Excitingly, these proteins are functionally enriched for membrane bending, vesicular biogenesis, and trafficking activities, suggesting that
eukaryotes evolved from an archaeal
host that contained some key components that governed the emergence of eukaryotic cellular complexity after endosymbiosis.
They live inside their
host's cells and have highly specialized features: They are only able to reproduce inside the
host's cells, they have the smallest known genome of all organisms with a cell nucleus (
eukaryotes) and they posses no mitochondria of their own (the cell's power plant).
Most scientists share the view that a symbiosis in which an archaeal
host cell took up a bacterium ultimately gave rise to
eukaryotes.
c) The
eukaryote then began a mutually beneficial (symbiotic) relationship with it whereby the
eukaryote provided protection and nutrients to the prokaryote, and in return, the prokaryotic endosymbiont provided additional energy to its eukaryotic
host through its respiratory cellular machinary.
The prokaryotic cells that were too small to be digested continued to live inside the
host eukaryote, eventually becoming dependent on the
host cell for organic molecules and inorganic compounds.
Many reports have shown that bacteria can interact with the
eukaryote nervous system, either for the benefit of the microbe or the benefit of the
host.
Formed by the merger of fat - eating mitochondria with glucose - eating bacteria, single - celled
eukaryotes had to regulate their various metabolic pathways to keep themselves from becoming too fatty or too lean (and to control the urge of mitochondria to eat their
hosts!).