Death statistics bear out medical views:
euthanasia killings of the mentally ill have sharply increased.
Not exact matches
When
euthanasia critics accuse him
of killing people, he said he always responds, «Well, I only
kill my friends.»
Critics
of Roe v. Wade have long contended that the principles used to justify abortion would soon or late be used to justify other forms
of medical
killing such as voluntary and, eventually, involuntary
euthanasia.
The position on abortion and
euthanasia inexorably follows; justice requires the protection
of both the unborn and those who are likely to become the objects
of mercy
killing.
The logical extension
of applying economic value to human life is
euthanasia -
killing nonproductive members
of society.
Singer was more responsible than anyone else for making the term «speciesism» known, beginning in 1975 with his highly influential book Animal Liberation and continuing with his widely professed proposal that so - called human non-persons can be
killed (infanticide or non-voluntary
euthanasia) because
of their «lower» moral status.
None
of the essays argues against assisted suicide and
euthanasia simply because
killing is wrong.
The
euthanasia item describes a situation in which the object
of the «mercy» and the family request the act
of killing.
These people would also be opposed to infanticide,
euthanasia and mercy
killing, especially when someone other than the target
of the «mercy» is making the decision.
The head
of a controversial assisted - suicide group in Switzerland says he will seek legal permission to help a Canadian woman and other healthy people like her
kill themselves, raising startling new issues in the emotional debate over
euthanasia.
Euthanasia is morally wrong because it involves the arbitrary
killing of innocent life.
Describing
euthanasia as «this ghastly doctrine» which «tries to justify the murder
of blameless men and would seek to give legal sanction to the forcible
killing of invalids, cripples, the incurable and the incapacitated» he went on:
The term «mercy
killing» is often used in place
of «
euthanasia» to emphasize that such an act is directly intended as an act
of kindness to end suffering.
Drawing on examples
of what is happening in the Netherlands, where the practice
of PAS and
euthanasia (voluntary and involuntary) has increased even though not formally legal, Manning, Larson and Amundsen suggest that the policy and practice
of euthanasia / PAS would weaken the general prohibition against
killing.
In wanting to license physicians to
kill, McKhann and other advocates
of euthanasia / PAS are calling into question the expectation that physicians will be healers committed to preventing, diagnosing and treating diseases and to promoting wholeness.
But here's a clue: almost NOBODY believes that
killing is absolutely wrong, as some subset or other
of the standard exceptions, ie acts during times
of war, executions for at least some crimes, the unborn,
euthanasia, even self defense are credited by almost everyone.
The book is a truly chilling read, not only because
of its crass advocacy for
killing the defenseless, but also because
of the ways in which it mirrors many concepts propounded by bioethicists and
euthanasia advocates today.
I predict that as atheism rises, so too will infanticide,
euthanasia, «mercy
killing», and a degredation
of human rights
The Nazi doctrine
of Lebensunwertes Leben (life that is not worthy
of life) had the widest possible applications, from
euthanasia to the elimination
of the handicapped to the mass
killings at Auschwitz.
Canada's pending legislation on
euthanasia and assisted suicide raises a question: What shall we call people who are legally involved in the destruction
of human life — particularly those who do the actual
killing?
Making plain the morally infectious nature
of euthanasia, large percentages reported that they could «conceive
of»
killing patients who were not terminally ill or, in some cases, who were not even physically ailing.
Yet, when condemning the
killing of sick and disabled people, the Holy Father also denounces «other more furtive, but no less serious and real, forms
of euthanasia.»
Some opponents
of euthanasia espouse the domino theory: if we permit
euthanasia, we'll soon be
killing retarded people, then the elderly, and then people whose ears are too large.
This is an in - depth and far - reaching conversation that includes dialogue about
euthanasia, blood transfusions, medical experimentation without consent, research fraud, vaccines as biological weapons, autism, the rape
of autistic children, the rape
of medical patients — especially during hospital birth, birth trauma, trauma - based mind - control, circumcision, satanism / luciferianism, psychopathy, Agenda 21, and the deliberate attempt to
kill and / or render infertile and / or genetically mutate the human race.
To be included on the list, candidates must «uphold strong traditional family values and prudent fiscal practice, oppose the
killing of preborn children for sex selection, convenience and birth control, and oppose assisted suicide and
euthanasia.»
Study participants were then asked to rate how much they agree with a series
of statements about
killing animals, such as, «It is often necessary to control for animal overpopulation through different means, such as hunting or
euthanasia,» or, «An experiment should never cause the
killing of animals.»
Partly as a legacy
of the way the abortion decisions came about in this country and the degree to which abortion is important in American politics,
killing and destruction -
of - life questions have come to be regarded as the bioethical questions, whether it's
euthanasia at the end
of life or abortion and embryo destruction at the beginning.
Gorsuch also authored a 2006 book, The Future
of Assisted Suicide and
Euthanasia, in which he built a legal and moral argument that intentional
killing is always wrong because human life is intrinsically valuable.
His new series, Mary
Kills People, a black comedy about the controversial practice
of euthanasia, is something very different.
Additionally, a 1981 Oklahoma State Court decision exempted cities with populations under 10,000 from the state
euthanasia law, essentially upholding the right
of these cities to use shooting as a method
of killing unwanted dogs, deeming it to be humane.
Petaluma Pet Pals rescues dogs, puppies, cats and kittens at risk
of euthanasia at high
kill shelters in the Bay Area and beyond.
We also try to help minimize
euthanasia rate
of healthy, adoptable dogs by rescuing them from high
kill facilities.
«If people knew they were
killing animals this way because they wanted to make budget cuts, I'm sure there would be a public outcry to spend the money for a more humane method
of euthanasia.»
Just passing some fantasy ordinance banning
euthanasia just ignores the overpopulation reality
of the situation, something every bit as pretentiously bogus as calling yourself a no -
kill shelter.
This will be an even bigger problem especially starting next February,» Chiang predicted to ANIMALS 24 - 7, «when all
of the shelters in Taiwan are to become no -
kill shelters due to the new zero -
euthanasia policy that passed the legislature last year.
I will never forget when we first spoke and she had not yet been pulled out
of the high
kill shelter that used a gas chamber as their form
of Euthanasia and you told me that she was sick and emaciated.
«Implicit to the no -
kill philosophy is the reality
of exceptional situations in which
euthanasia is the most humane alternative available.
While it is true that
euthanasia is a fact
of animal pound and shelter operations in Victoria, the question this audit is answering is not whether
euthanasia is ever appropriate, but whether the LDH
kill rate is higher than acceptable, measured against similar organisations.
If all are in agreement that the dog is, in human terms, «suicidal», and is going to
kill itself, then
euthanasia is justified to prevent the suffering
of the animal.
The county decided earlier this year to change its
euthanasia method after controversy erupted over the outdated air chamber used by the shelter to
kill hundreds
of unwanted pets picked up every year throughout the county.
And let's start by banning the word «
euthanasia» when it's used in place
of the word
killing,
of an otherwise healthy and adoptable animal.
Felines & Canines Rescue Center is dedicated to ending the
euthanasia of adoptable dogs and cats in Northern Alabama by providing a safe, loving, no -
kill animal shelter that focuses on the transportation
of excess animals to fellow no -
kill rescue partners in Illinois and surrounding Northern states.
Killing of this sort can be classified as either
euthanasia, undertaken as a last resort and solely to serve the interest
of an irremediably suffering animal, or non-
euthanasia, undertaken to serve a wider spectrum
of interests.
Regardless, medical - justified
killing at every shelter deserves to be continually regulated, audited, and reevaluated with the goal
of permitting only actual
euthanasia in the context
of the current state
of the art
of care.
1) As a no -
kill shelter, if one
of our dogs is repeatedly passed over by the public, we do not automatically consider that dog unworthy or unadoptable and do not «remedy» the situation by opening up his held space through
euthanasia.
Accordingly, the No
Kill Advocacy Center has set the goal to «end the
killing of animals who are not irremediably suffering and thus return the term «
euthanasia» to its dictionary definition.»
Ever since Elmer and Ammon Zimmerman, owners
of E&A and A&J Kennels in Berks County, shot and
killed their 80 dogs sometime between Thursday, July 24 and Tuesday, July 29, questions about the law that makes this cowardly and inhumane act «legal» have surfaced. Many have inquired as to why licensed kennel operators are permitted to legally shoot their breeding stock, believing that private citizens were prohibited from this same gruesome form
of euthanasia, and if you think so too, think again.
Today's society has a heightened awareness
of the staggering
euthanasia rates occurring in animal shelters, and there is more determination than ever to reduce the
killing of healthy animals.
Under HB 27 a veterinarian, certified
euthanasia technician or a probationary CET working under the supervision
of a veterinarian, has complete discretion to choose the method
of killing: CO gas chambers or lethal injection.  A log must be kept
of the method
of killing used for each animal, the identity
of the person performing the killing and the reason for the particular method. Â
VIETNAM: These «
euthanasia» sessions are regular occurrences, where unwanted greyhounds — including young and healthy dogs — are
killed by the dozens in direct, distressing view
of their friends.