Not exact matches
Our comprehensive
assessment approach provides in - depth data and insights
to evaluate and predict a leader's ability
to perform, fit and make an impact.
Guard officials described the
assessment as a «disciplined
approach to identify major waterway safety hazards, estimate risk levels,
evaluate potential mitigation measures and set the stage for implementation of selected measures
to reduce risk.»
Designing new, research - based
approaches to assessment to lessen the unwanted side - effects of TBA and increase the desired effects,
evaluating their validity, and using the results of this ongoing research
to develop needed modifications.
Harvard Graduate School of Education will work with the Strategic Education Research Partnership and other partners
to complete a program of work designed
to a) investigate the predictors of reading comprehension in 4th - 8th grade students, in particular the role of skills at perspective - taking, complex reasoning, and academic language in predicting deep comprehension outcomes, b) track developmental trajectories across the middle grades in perspective - taking, complex reasoning, academic language skill, and deep comprehension, c) develop and
evaluate curricular and pedagogical
approaches designed
to promote deep comprehension in the content areas in 4th - 8th grades, and d) develop and
evaluate an intervention program designed for 6th - 8th grade students reading at 3rd - 4th grade level.The HGSE team will take responsibility, in collaboration with colleagues at other institutions, for the following components of the proposed work: Instrument development: Pilot data collection using interviews and candidate
assessment items, collaboration with DiscoTest colleagues
to develop coding of the pilot data so as
to produce well - justified learning sequences for perspective - taking, complex reasoning, academic language skill, and deep comprehension.Curricular development: HGSE investigators Fischer, Selman, Snow, and Uccelli will contribute
to the development of a discussion - based curriculum for 4th - 5th graders, and
to the expansion of an existing discussion - based curriculum for 6th - 8th graders, with a particular focus on science content (Fischer), social studies content (Selman), and academic language skills (Snow & Uccelli).
Observing the on - the - job implementation of newly acquired knowledge, using simulations and scenario - based
approaches, comparing the performance of online training course before and after the training, conducting
assessments for the employees of an organization based on the online training they received
to assess the amount of knowledge they gained through that online training course, are some of the ways through which the strategy of online training can be
evaluated by an IT organization and can be improved based on the outcome.
Develop and apply a comprehensive range of
assessment strategies
to diagnose learning needs, comply with curriculum requirements and support colleagues
to evaluate the effectiveness of their
approaches to assessment.
For example,» improving history essay structure for EAL pupils through targeted use of formative feedback» rather than simply «improving
assessment for learning» leads
to more focused professional learning, which makes it easier for the participant
to evaluate and refine their
approach.
A standards - based
approach allows teachers
to use information from a variety of
assessments to evaluate student learning.
Performance
assessments offer a richer, more holistic
approach to evaluating what students know and can do.
These seven briefs will help states take full advantage of the unprecedented opportunity
to develop next generation
approaches to assessment that transcend the standardized instruments commonly used
to evaluate school and student performance.
Popham urges the adoption of purposeful educational
assessment, a measurement
approach in which tests are built and appraised according
to their one primary purpose, be it
to compare student test scores, improve instruction and learning, or
evaluate learning.
The report also describes how two states, Illinois and Delaware, have
approached evaluation, and provides a tool from its model - development work, an
assessment that states can use
to determine their degree of «readiness» for building a stronger system
to evaluate principal preparation programs.
In a guest editorial in Educational Leadership 20 years ago (April 1989), Art Costa suggested five
approaches to «reassessing
assessment»: (1) reestablish the school as the locus of accountability; (2) expand the range and variety of the
assessment techniques used; (3) systematize this variety of
assessment procedures by developing schoolwide plans for collection and use of information; (4) reeducate legislators, parents, board members, and the community
to help them understand that standardized test scores are inadequate indicators of the quality of schools, teachers, and students; and (5) remind ourselves that the purpose of evaluation is
to enable students
to evaluate themselves.
LaCelle - Peterson, also currently the the senior vice president of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP), provided key insights into
assessment standards for national accreditation, specifically in regards
to creating an evidence - based
approach to evaluating performance in preparing beginning teachers.
Considerations for selecting
assessments will be discussed, and one
approach, (the DESSA), will illustrate how social and emotional data can be used
to guide instruction,
evaluate outcomes, and support continuous quality improvement efforts in your programs.
Designed for practicing professionals such as teachers, counselors, psychologists, and administrators, Identifying Gifted Students addresses definitions, models, and characteristics of gifted students; qualitative and quantitative
approaches to assessment; culturally fair and nonbiased
assessment; and how
to evaluate the effectiveness of identification procedures.
In Data - Driven High School Reform, Lachat writes, «Putting student learning at the center of school accountability requires the capacity
to assess and use data
to monitor student performance and
to evaluate the extent
to which new structures and
approaches to curriculum, instruction and
assessment result in higher levels of achievement» (2001).
This report illustrates an
approach to evaluating school reform that goes beyond the
assessment of student outcomes.
Given the sheer number of game released each year, as well as the extended time required
to fully
evaluate said products, a «voting outlet»
approach allows for the widest possible critical
assessment.
Building on lessons from earlier Technology Needs Assessment (TNA) efforts over the past decade, it offers a systematic
approach for conducting
assessments in order
to identify,
evaluate and prioritize technological means for both mitigation and adaptation.
Moreover, climate communication faces new challenges as
assessments of climate - related changes confront uncertainty more explicitly and adopt risk - based
approaches to evaluating impacts.
Schools have the flexibility
to innovate by developing and trialling new
approaches and by using
assessment data
to evaluate the efficacy of these interventions.