Corrigendum to «Using records from submarine, aircraft and satellites to
evaluate climate model simulations of Arctic sea ice thickness» published in The Cryosphere, 8, 1839 - 1854, 2014.
Not exact matches
After the field campaign, Fast will perform computer
simulations to help
evaluate all of the field campaign data and quantify the uncertainties associated with using coarse grid global
climate models to study megacity emissions and to determine the radiative impact of the Mexico City particulates on the local and regional
climate.
The scientists carefully
evaluated many aspects of the
climate in the four
simulations, using measurements taken from the area, data pulled together from other studies, and data produced by the
model.
Phillips, T.J., et al., 2004:
Evaluating parameterizations in general circulation
models:
Climate simulation meets weather prediction.
The other point is that attribution studies
evaluate the extent to which patterns of
model response to external forcing (i.e., fingerprints)
simulations explain
climate change in * observations.
Well, it is a very ambitions and painstaking project which has managed to bring together all the aforementioned
modeling groups which run specified
model experiments with very similar forcings and then performed coordinated diagnostic analyses to
evaluate these
model simulations and determine the uncertainty in the future
climate projections in their
models.
A recent meta - analysis published in the journal Nature
Climate Change, by Challinor et al. (2014) examines 1,722 crop model simulations, run using global climate model output under several emissions scenarios, to evaluate the potential effects of climate change and adaptation on crop
Climate Change, by Challinor et al. (2014) examines 1,722 crop
model simulations, run using global
climate model output under several emissions scenarios, to evaluate the potential effects of climate change and adaptation on crop
climate model output under several emissions scenarios, to
evaluate the potential effects of
climate change and adaptation on crop
climate change and adaptation on crop yield.
This is due in part to the difficulties of
evaluating runoff
simulations across a range of
climate models due to variations in rainfall, snowmelt and net radiation.
This study
evaluates the tropical intraseasonal variability, especially the fidelity of Madden - Julian oscillation (MJO)
simulations, in 14 coupled general circulation
models (GCMs) participating in the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4).
They ran an ensemble of
simulations with a
climate model of intermediate complexity to
evaluate the causes of past
climate changes.
The study uses an extensive suite of existing
simulations with the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrologic
model driven by Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) climate simulations to train and evaluate the nonlinear and nonstationary Generalized Extreme Value conditional density network (GEVcdn) model of Fraser River streamflow extremes, and subsequently applies the model to project changes in Fraser River extremes under CMIP5 based climate change scena
model driven by Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) climate simulations to train and evaluate the nonlinear and nonstationary Generalized Extreme Value conditional density network (GEVcdn) model of Fraser River streamflow extremes, and subsequently applies the model to project changes in Fraser River extremes under CMIP5 based climate change scena
Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3)
climate simulations to train and
evaluate the nonlinear and nonstationary Generalized Extreme Value conditional density network (GEVcdn)
model of Fraser River streamflow extremes, and subsequently applies the model to project changes in Fraser River extremes under CMIP5 based climate change scena
model of Fraser River streamflow extremes, and subsequently applies the
model to project changes in Fraser River extremes under CMIP5 based climate change scena
model to project changes in Fraser River extremes under CMIP5 based
climate change scenarios.
In using AOGCM output in this way, it is important not only to demonstrate that these unforced
simulations do not drift significantly (Osborn, 1996), but also to
evaluate the extent to which
model estimates of low - frequency variability are comparable to those estimated from measured
climates (Osborn et al., 2000) or reconstructed palaeoclimates (Jones et al., 1998).
Further, key processes associated with the interactions between aerosols and clouds are either neglected or treated with simple parameterizations in
climate model simulations evaluated in the AR4.
In
climate model simulations, anthropogenic and natural forcings as well as feedback phenomena are taken into account and their impact on the
climate is
evaluated.
The
climate feedbacks involved with these changes, which are key in understanding the
climate system as a whole, include: + the importance of aerosol absorption on
climate + the impact of aerosol deposition which affects biology and, hence, emissions of aerosols and aerosol precursors via organic nitrogen, organic phosphorus and iron fertilization + the importance of land use and land use changes on natural and anthropogenic aerosol sources + the SOA sources and impact on
climate, with special attention on the impact human activities have on natural SOA formation In order to quantitatively answer such questions I perform
simulations of the past, present and future atmospheres, and make comparisons with measurements and remote sensing data, all of which help understand,
evaluate and improve the
model's parameterizations and performance, and our understanding of the Earth system.
Evaluating on
climate change time scales can't effectively be done because we only have crude
climate model simulations from the 1980's and the more sophisticated coupled
models really came in the mid 1990's.