Sentences with phrase «evaluate model accuracy»

We thank reviewers who suggested the use of confidence intervals to evaluate model accuracy and many of the topics used to test the degree to which the results generated by the statistical model are robust.

Not exact matches

Researchers also evaluated the accuracy of existing climate model predictions for that region.

It is also standard practice to evaluate the accuracy of the band models (or correlated k type approaches) against detailed line - by - line data and calculations.

The aim of the GPCR DOCK competition is to evaluate the accuracy of 3D structural models of GPCRs and their interactions with drug molecules.

Although the results could differ in other settings, our method of using natural teacher turnover to evaluate bias in VA estimates can be easily implemented by school districts to evaluate the accuracy of their VA models.

- A chassis dynamo possessing lower inertia, higher response, and higher accuracy than the conventional dynamo is adopted; Controlling the motor using a physical model for the vehicle» s usage environment makes it possible to evaluate vehicles with high reproducibility under virtual driving conditions (low - friction road, uphill, gear ratio change, etc..)

It is also standard practice to evaluate the accuracy of the band models (or correlated k type approaches) against detailed line - by - line data and calculations.

When evaluating a model forecast that as of the most recent available date is effectively EXACTLY right, there is no way any reasonable person can conclude that the performance of the model is anything other than consistent with a high degree of accuracy..

The main objective of the Action is to evaluate and improve our ability to project the consequences of environmental change for European forests by addressing questions regarding data needs, scaling, parameterization, and predictive accuracy of forest models.

And to the extent that there is some effort now being made to evaluate the accuracy of computer models past, now that there is at least some means to do so, it's a very worthy effort.

If the issue is limited to the evaluating, post hoc, the accuracy of any respective computer model, then I would certainly agree that any of the prospective assumptions made long ago as to emissions scenarios are irrelevant.

There is, however, a point to be made about exercising caution when evaluating the forward - looking output of a computer model, particularly when those models are used to advocate policy changes on the assumption that the computer model accurately simulates the earth's climate, and more particularly when there is no demonstrable track record of the predictive accuracy of the model.

A paper published in Nature Climate Change, Frame and Stone (2012), sought to evaluate the FAR temperature projection accuracy by using a simple climate model to simulate the warming from 1990 through 2010 based on observed GHG and other global heat imbalance changes.

By 2025 it may be possible to evaluate the accuracies of all the model predictions for 2012 — 2025, and reach a reasonable conclusion as to which model (s) might most be relied upon for planning the subsequent 75 years.

One recent study, for example, presented a thorough and careful scrutiny of hundreds of peer - reviewed scientific publications evaluating the accuracy and capability of climate models to simulate the response of a number of important climatic phenomena to rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

• Create technical drawings and evaluate their accuracy with computer models.