It's not to say that many websites do not have valuable content, but rather, your content needs to be promoted, distributed and
evaluated by peers, publishers and webmasters in order to gain inbound links.
It uses a self - correcting system in which research results are shared and critically
evaluated by peers, and experiments are repeated when necessary.
Each child in the study was also
evaluated by his peers at school.
Examiners are given a week of training when first hired and are
evaluated by their peers and by the institutions at the conclusion of each visit.
On average, teachers in other countries are twice as likely to be
evaluated by peers as U.S. teachers (OECD, 2014).
The program involves putting together a portfolio to prove the applicant has the knowledge and skills required; it is then
evaluated by a Peer Review panel.
Attorneys are
evaluated by peer recognition and professional achievement and are grouped according to their primary practice area.
Not exact matches
The introverted students gave lower ratings to their extroverted
peers compared to their introverted ones, whereas the ratings
by extroverted students didn't vary based on the personality of the person they were
evaluating.
Inc., to review our existing executive compensation program and to assist us in
evaluating potential changes to our program following an assessment of the compensation plans used
by a
peer group of publicly traded commercial airlines and transportation companies.
Our model
evaluates the compensation of the top five executives
by benchmarking that compensation against the compensation of the top five officers at
peer companies.
By treating children in a camp - like setting, we are able to intensively
evaluate and provide direct interventions related to children's difficulties in
peer relationships and group activities.
In view of the growing body of work
evaluating breastfeeding
peer support, we have distinguished between this and other kinds of lay support, following the definition by Dennis 2002: «Peer support is provided by lay individuals who are not part of the client's own embedded network, who possess experiential knowledge of the targeted behaviour (i.e. successful breastfeeding skills) and similar qualities (i.e. age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, residency etc.) in order to aid the client during a time of actual or potential stress (i.e. the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding).&ra
peer support, we have distinguished between this and other kinds of lay support, following the definition
by Dennis 2002: «
Peer support is provided by lay individuals who are not part of the client's own embedded network, who possess experiential knowledge of the targeted behaviour (i.e. successful breastfeeding skills) and similar qualities (i.e. age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, residency etc.) in order to aid the client during a time of actual or potential stress (i.e. the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding).&ra
Peer support is provided
by lay individuals who are not part of the client's own embedded network, who possess experiential knowledge of the targeted behaviour (i.e. successful breastfeeding skills) and similar qualities (i.e. age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, residency etc.) in order to aid the client during a time of actual or potential stress (i.e. the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding).»
The ESRC confirms the quality of its funded research
by evaluating research projects through a process of
peers review.
More at www.esrc.ac.uk The ESRC confirms the quality of its funded research
by evaluating research projects through a process of
peers review.
In this section, include information about how your courses were
evaluated and how your teaching activities accommodated evaluations
by yourself, your students, TAs, and
peers.
Following an inquiry into
peer review in scientific research, U.K. parliamentarians have concluded that, despite many criticisms and little evidence of its effectiveness, the traditional practice of having research articles
evaluated by anonymous colleagues before publication is valued
by the community and shouldn't be completely abandoned.
Following an enquiry into
peer review in scientific research, U.K. parliamentarians have concluded that, despite many criticisms and little evidence of its effectiveness, the traditional practice of having research articles
evaluated by anonymous colleagues before publication is valued
by the community and shouldn't be completely abandoned.
The
peer review process for research published in academic journals helps verify that the methods and conclusions have been
evaluated by experts in the field and meets rigorous standards for accuracy.
First, unlike the news magazines like Science or Nature, you always get your paper reviewed
by scientific
peers who are qualified to
evaluate the science.
In 1996, in response to these concerns, Varmus, then director of NIH, impaneled a group of experienced clinical investigators and academic health center administrators to make recommendations that might guide the NIH toward policy changes to alleviate the concerns in the clinical research community.14 Several of the panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH
peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be
evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented research.
It improves access for the users of the INFRAFRONTIER Research Infrastructure
by building capacities for systemic phenotyping, archiving and distribution of mouse models and
by providing an efficient and transparent access process, based on
peer -
evaluated scientific excellence.
** These drugs have all been through the
peer review process and have been
evaluated and approved
by the FDA.
Peer - reviewed articles have been
evaluated by several researchers or subject specialist in the academic community prior to accepting it for publication.
Why not throw corporate learners the ball, and let them
evaluate each other
by providing
peer - based eLearning feedback?
Specifically, I separated out the effects on test - score gains of a student's race and ethnicity, as well as accounted for the influence of a student's
peers,
by evaluating the influence of demographic characteristics of the student body, including average income level and percentage of minority students.
In PAR, the local teachers union and district administrators jointly manage a program to improve teacher quality
by having expert teachers mentor and
evaluate their
peers.
And
by evaluating their
peers with the same rubric the teacher uses, students gain a better understanding of the criteria for strong critical thinking and discussion.
Proposals are
evaluated by independent scholars in a competitive,
peer - review process.
They will then design, make and
evaluate the shoes made
by a
peer and their own shoes.
Now, a group of 60
peer reviewers and alternates, who have been vetted and selected
by the department, will
evaluate the applications, scoring them on a 500 - point scale.
The award of Accreditation
by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges indicates that an educational institution has conducted a rigorous, comprehensive self - assessment of its learning community as a whole and has hosted a Visiting Team of
peer reviewers to
evaluate and validate its alignment with the Standards for Accreditation in terms of its own stated educational goals.
Unit 6: Students as Evaluators — Students learn about
evaluating themselves, their
peers, their classes, and their school
by actually
evaluating student voice in their school.
More and more educators are leading the way toward ensuring the highest quality work forces
by working collaboratively with school districts to establish residency programs, mentoring programs, and
peer assistance and review programs to
evaluate instructional practice.
Grant proposals will be
evaluated by a group of
peer reviewers selected
by ASCD, the U.S. Department of Education, and the NBPTS.
Teachers should be
evaluated by robust systems that use multiple measures, as well as parent and
peer input, to identify their weaknesses, help them improve, and weed those unsuited to the job out of the profession.
Submissions are
evaluated by a jury of three professional
peers from leading cultural institutions in Chicago, as well as representatives from the Chicago Artists Coalition, the Coney Family, and OtherPeoplePixels.
To develop an aesthetic awareness
by evaluating artwork and receiving feedback from
peers, the resident artist and professional working artists;
Scientific journals
evaluate arguments of this sort using a
peer - review process
by which purportedly impartial experts in the relevant field verify the paper's accuracy and suitability for publication.
A) if Judith does not look at alleged errors made
by the «extended
peer community» as they
evaluate and communicate science to the public, then she should not look at errors in the IPCC
Of all the points made
by S&N, perhaps the most telling is in a follow - up post on the Breakthrough Institute blog: «Nearly every profession, from public health to business to law, has research studies, conferences, and
peer - review journals dedicated to
evaluating what's working and what's not.
The most comprehensive
peer - reviewed studies done
by independent scientists
evaluate air pollution, worker safety, and all of the other risks in energy production and find that nuclear is safer than coal, oil, natural gas, and even solar.20, 21
After being nominated
by their
peers, honorees are
evaluated by a panel composed of eminent lawyers and D Magazine's editors to be named to the Best Lawyers in Dallas list.
Rising Stars Super Lawyers are nominated
by their
peers and
evaluated by a blue ribbon panel.
«Super Lawyers Rising Stars» are nominated
by their
peers and
evaluated by a blue ribbon panel.
«Super Lawyers» are nominated
by their
peers and
evaluated by a blue ribbon panel.
Best Lawyers is a highly respected
peer review guide to the legal profession worldwide, and its lists of outstanding attorneys are compiled
by conducting extensive
peer - review surveys in which tens of thousands of leading lawyers confidentially
evaluate their professional
peers.
Best Lawyers compiles its lists of attorneys
by conducting
peer - review surveys in which thousands of leading lawyers confidentially
evaluate their professional
peers.
Attorneys are selected to the Best Lawyers guide through a confidential nomination and voting process
by top lawyers
evaluating their professional
peers.
Best Lawyers in America ® compiles its lists of outstanding lawyers
by conducting
peer - review surveys in which tens of thousands of leading lawyers confidentially
evaluate their
peers.
Best Lawyers is based on submissions
by almost 5 million attorneys in the United States who confidentially
evaluate the legal abilities of their professional
peers; lawyers are selected as a «Lawyer of the Year» only if the number of votes received «indicates a clear leader» in the field.