Not exact matches
Schools operating under the alternative contract would be free to
evaluate teachers based
on student performance and evaluation, as well as
classroom observation and other evidence.
We study a sample of midcareer elementary and middle school teachers in the Cincinnati Public Schools, all of whom were
evaluated in a yearlong program, based largely
on classroom observation, sometime between the 2003 — 04 and 2009 — 10 school years.
After decades of relying
on often - perfunctory
classroom observations to assess teacher performance, districts from Washington, D.C., to Los Angeles now
evaluate many of their teachers based in part
on VA measures and, in some cases, use these measures as a basis for differences in compensation.
Moreover, the report found that overall,
classroom observations — the way most teachers around the country have been
evaluated for decades — are highly unreliable
on their own.
Jason Kamras, deputy to D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee in charge of human capital, talks with Education Next about the new teacher evaluation system put in place in D.C. Beginning this year, teachers in D.C. will be
evaluated based
on student test scores (when available) and
classroom observations (by principals and master educators), and poorly performing teachers may be fired, regardless of tenure.
(Tenn.) A report out this month marking the results of the first three years of a new program that trains principals to better
evaluate teachers using
classroom observation found 100,000 additional students were
on grade level in math in 2014 as compared to 2010; and 57,000 more were
on grade level in science.
Under the Toledo Peer Assistance and Review program, about a dozen «consulting teachers»
on leave from their
classrooms for three years mentor and
evaluate Toledo's first - year teachers through frequent, informal
classroom observations and as many as six (usually unannounced) evaluations each semester.
Mastery of knowledge or of a skill should be
evaluated based
on all of the available evidence, including performance
on classroom assessments, assignments, and
classroom observations.
Under this system, teachers are
evaluated on a four - point scale based
on multiple measures that include
classroom observations, content standards, and assessments of student growth.
The report also examines principals» capacity to perform teacher evaluations, including their experience conducting
classroom observations and formally
evaluating teachers before becoming a principal and the support they receive in these areas once
on the job.
In the end (which is actually near the beginning of the manuscript), Goldhaber notes that VAMs are «distinct» as compared to
classroom observations, because they offer «an objective measure that does not rely
on human interpretation of teacher practices, and by design, [they offer] a system in which teachers are
evaluated relative to one another rather than relative to an absolute standard (i.e., it creates a distribution in which teachers can be ranked).
The principal would
evaluate them based
on classroom observations from time - to - time to assess their effectiveness based
on what he or she saw them doing.
Until recently, most teachers were
evaluated based only
on infrequent
classroom observations by principals.