Publicizing teachers»
evaluation scores strikes me completely counter productive to that goal.
Not exact matches
Most important, the United Federation of Teachers still hasn't
struck a deal with the city on how to use student test
scores in these
evaluations.
The persistence of the benefits of tracking is
striking, as many
evaluations find that the test -
score effects of successful interventions fade over time.
In fact, Andrew Cuomo helped move the student
score needle up, writing in a letter to the Regents just before their May vote, «This change would ensure that greater balance is
struck between using objective teacher
evaluation measures... and subjective teacher
evaluation measures.»
During the
strike, Chicago Teachers Union president Karen Lewis said she was concerned that «too much of the new
evaluations will be based on students» standardized test
scores,» and argued there were «too many factors beyond our control which impact how well some students perform on standardized tests, such as poverty, exposure to violence, homelessness, hunger, and other social issues beyond our control» (Chicago Teachers Union, 2012, para. 5).
In September, teachers went on
strike and won a pay raise and limits on test
scores in teacher
evaluations.
Under the deal that concluded the
strike, test
scores now will account for only 30 percent of the criteria for teacher
evaluations.
In Chicago, test
scores were set to comprise 40 percent of teacher
evaluations until a seven - day teacher
strike erupted in September 2012.
A dispute over the exact weight that student test
scores have in teacher
evaluations is at the very heart of the teacher's
strike in Chicago.