Requiring regular
evaluations of teachers using multiple measures based on clear standards for effective practice, measures of student achievement growth, and other measures such as observations and lesson plans or other artifacts of practice.
In the wake of high - profile
evaluations of teachers using their students» test scores, such as one conducted by the Los Angeles Times, a study released last month suggests some such methods, called «value added» measures, are too imprecise to rate teachers» effectiveness.
Being a learning leader means balancing
the evaluation of teachers using collected data based on student outcomes set forth in the curriculum while also taking into account students» ability to demonstrate the content, how they utilize higher order thinking skills in processing their understanding, and what problem - solving strategies are incorporated into the learning.
Other issues, especially
the evaluation of teachers using student test scores, are said to have been the final straw.
Not exact matches
Decoupled the state assessments from
teacher evaluations and placed a four - year moratorium on the
use of student test scores for
evaluation purposes;
Nolan said the measure does not preclude individual school districts from
using the test score results as part
of their
teacher evaluations, if everyone at the school agrees.
That garnered a lot
of attention, in part, because it came at a time when state leaders sought to
use the test results in
teacher evaluations.
The vote came a few months after the state's
teachers unions, closely aligned with the Assembly, claimed a victory in December when the Regents, prompted by the governor and Legislative leaders, placed a moratorium on the
use of student test scores in
teacher evaluations.
For far too long these controversial standards have been pushed along without input from parents, and with the governor's proposal to increase
use of high - stakes testing in
teacher evaluations, now is the time to return control back to them.»
New York is going back to the drawing board to rethink the way it evaluates school
teachers and principals after controversy over the
use of student test scores in job
evaluations helped fuel a massive boycott
of state exams in recent years.
The Board
of Regents, on recommendation from Cuomo's Common Core task force, put in place a moratorium on the
use of test scores in
teacher and principal
evaluations through the 2019 - 20 school year.
At least going by his rhetoric, he seems to have almost declared war on the
teacher unions and he has proposed a new system
of evaluation, which is more heavily based on students» tests scores than the one currently in
use.
The delegates approved two resolutions: one calling for the proper
use of assessments to further education, and the other calling for the state Board
of Regents to hold public hearings on the implementation
of the required changes to the
teacher evaluation system.
He said the union also needs to work to make permanent the ban on the
use of state ELA and math tests in
teacher evaluations and to make sure the charter school cap is not increased.
Education advocates and
teachers» unions have questioned the
use of the test scores in the
teacher and principal
evaluations, saying they are unreliable.
It is unclear whether federal acting secretary
of education John King — New York's former state education c ommissioner who championed the Common Core and helped usher in the
use of teacher evaluations tied to state assessments under No Child Left Behind and the federal Race To The Top grant program — will give his blessing.
A New York appeals court ruled last year that a less comprehensive form
of teacher evaluations used by New York City's Department of Education — known as Teacher Data Reports — must be disclosed under the state's Freedom of Informati
teacher evaluations used by New York City's Department
of Education — known as
Teacher Data Reports — must be disclosed under the state's Freedom of Informati
Teacher Data Reports — must be disclosed under the state's Freedom
of Information Law.
Their implementation came at the same time a new
teacher evaluation system went into effect across New York state,
using some
of the test results from the new curriculum as a measure
of a
teacher's effectiveness and ultimately job security.
Last week, we were confronted with a bill presented by Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver's conference that would essentially provide for a two - year moratorium on the APPR (
teacher evaluations) while establishing some restrictions regarding
use of a student's personal data.
It was a dramatic increase from the existing
evaluation rubric, settled with
teachers unions as part
of the state's Race to the Top deal, that
used state tests as 20 percent
of a
teacher's rating.
The deal would delay that
use for two years, but would allow the tests to continue to be
used in job
evaluations of teachers and principals, said two state officials Tuesday night.
Cuomo has sought a two - year moratorium on
using test scores in students» grades, but wanted to
use the testing as part
of the job
evaluations of teachers and principals.
Cuomo's task force on academic standards and testing expects to hand in its much anticipated report this month, amid a continuing push by
teachers unions to end the
use of student test scores in
teacher evaluations.
The state Education Department's review
of teacher evaluations and how student tests scores are
used in that process will continue into 2016, state Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia said.
But her stance on Common Core could factor into Rosa's relationship with state Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia, who has supported the move toward higher standards, as well as the
use of student test scores in
teacher evaluations.
Dr. Vanden Wyngaard and district staff will provide an overview
of state exams and how the Common Core Learning Standards are changing instruction for students at all grade levels, as well as information about how the tests are
used in the new statewide
evaluation systems for
teachers and principals.
Meanwhile, test refusal groups still are calling for parents to opt their children out
of state exams as well as the local tests
used in
teacher evaluations.
The Board
of Regents, with Cuomo's support, recently placed a moratorium on the
use of student test scores for
teacher evaluations through the 2018 - 19 school year.
The majority
of school districts, 606
of them, are
using that existing
teacher and principal
evaluation system, having gotten a waiver letting them to push back implementing the new, Cuomo - backed system — under which
teachers are scored on a matrix — until September 2016.
The group was not originally charged with looking at the
use of scores in
teacher evaluations, but it tackled that subject anyway.
ALBANY — Some school districts will have to go back to the negotiating table as schools begin to navigate a moratorium on the
use of test scores in
teacher and principal
evaluations.
Schools are
using the exams to establish student growth for the purpose
of state - mandated
teacher evaluations, which are in their second year in most
of the state and their first year in New York City.
The mayor said an
evaluation system would highlight the «amazing» job that
teachers have done to improve graduation rates, adding that a «handful
of teachers» could
use «remedial work,» while others «can not be in front
of our kids.»
Then the unions fed the paranoid «opt out» movement, with hundreds
of thousands
of parents (mostly middle - class Long Islanders) refusing to let their kids take the state exams that measure student achievement — and Cuomo waved the white flag on
using exams as part
of teacher evaluations.
The
teacher's union, which is locked in a bitter war with Mayor Michael Bloomberg over the terms
of a new
teacher evaluation system, has repeatedly slammed the administration for
using closures as a key method for turning schools around.
She said her run against Cuomo would be built on a critique
of his
use of high - dollar campaign donations and his support for linking
teacher performance
evaluations to student test scores.
Ms. Rosa has criticized what she sees as excessive testing and the
use of test scores in
teacher evaluations.
Opt - out activists have said the number will continue to grow, citing reasons such as the perceived «over-testing»
of students
using exams that are not age and grade appropriate, as well as the
use of test scores on
teacher evaluations.
She also questioned the reliability
of using student test scores in
evaluations, something advocates and the American Statistical Association have said is not an accurate way
of evaluating
teachers.
Topics ranged from the
use of standardized testing and school co-location, to school closures and the recent gridlock between Mayor Michael Bloomberg and the UFT over
teacher evaluations.
While the state has taken some
of the stakes away from the «high stakes» tests, such as not
using them for
teacher evaluations, districts still see them as crucial.
There was something for everyone on the menu:
using Apple technology, developing research - based practices to teach students in the early grades, engaging students through digital instruction, understanding the new
teacher evaluation system as set by state law, preventing high - risk student behaviors and how Community Learning Schools meet the needs
of students and their families.
Earlier this week, the Regents passed emergency regulations putting a hold on the
use of state test scores on
teacher and principal
evaluations.
The new law expressly forbids the federal government from mandating the
use of tests scores in
teacher evaluation and from mandating the
use of Common Core standards.
On the new system for
teacher evaluation, the source
of many chapter leaders» questions later in the meeting, Mulgrew clarified that only
teachers in restart or transformation schools will be evaluated
using the Charlotte Danielson
evaluation rubric this school year.
But unions and the State Education Department have battled over how districts should handle
teacher evaluations in the absence
of test scores, with the union saying scores should be thrown out entirely and the state saying a backup measure should be
used.
Not satisfied with a state Board
of Regents decision to put a hold on the
use of test scores in
teacher and principal
evaluations, New York State Allies for Public Education is urging its members to opt out
of local exams that will be taking the place
of standardized, Common Core - aligned tests
used to evaluate
teachers.
The state education department still is in the process
of advising districts how the moratorium will work in their
evaluation systems, but generally the locally negotiated, state - approved assessments will be
used instead
of the state test scores in
teacher and principal
evaluations.
The draft also includes a space for the task force to weigh in on the impact
of student test scores on
teacher evaluations, and the panel will likely
use that space to recommend up to a four - year moratorium, according to a source familiar with the task force's plans.
A bipartisan draft bill to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the original name
of the federal education legislation, would bar the federal government from requiring states to
use student test scores in
teacher evaluations or forcing closure or other sanctions on struggling schools.