Results indicated that parent reports and independent
evaluator ratings suggest that, when compared with an individual child - focused treatment, Building Confidence Program produced greater symptom reduction and improved functioning at posttreatment.
BITSEA / P correlated significantly with
evaluator ratings of social - emotional / behavioral problems and negatively with competence ratings.
Evaluator ratings were collected only for the home visit sample (n = 113 — 124).
Criterion - related validity was evaluated by comparing the BITSEA with the CBCL / 1.5 - 5 and independent
evaluator ratings.
Substudy sample data were used to assess interrater reliability, test - retest reliability, and correlations with
evaluator ratings.
Sample sizes for other correlations varied due to random missing data (
evaluator ratings n = 113 — 124; parental worry n = 1,209 — 1,211; Year 2 CBCL n = 1,094 — 1,107; Year 2 ITSEA n = 1,121 — 1,123).
BITSEA / C correlated significantly with
evaluator ratings of competence.
Further evidence of validity was documented in the small to modest correlations between the BITSEA and
evaluator ratings of problems and competence, which were well within the range of commonly reported parent / observer correlations (Achenbach et al., 1987).
Somehow, despite the size similarity, both sets of
evaluators rated those with eating disorders as less attractive — in accord with the ratings the disordered individuals gave themselves.
An evaluator rates the SLO / SGO using a four or five point scale — «high quality» to «unacceptable» or «incomplete.»
Following home visits,
evaluators rated children's social — emotional problems and competencies in categories designed to generally parallel ITSEA scales.
Not exact matches
Use our Mutual Fund
Evaluator to search among thousands of funds available through Fidelity, filtering and sorting for a range of performance criteria and fund characteristics, including
ratings from Morningstar and other independent experts.
Compassion has been awarded eight consecutive, four - star
ratings by Charity Navigator, America's largest charity
evaluator.
I admit that hindsight is 20/20 (or 50/50 as per Cam), but that's a pathetic success
rate of a so - called talent -
evaluator, film - junkie or whatever else he called himself.
Of course every team will have different boards, as the ability to project college players at the next level is way more complicated than
rating current NFL players like for free agency: both are subjective and fallible, but you have to trust the process of your
evaluators...
He had a star
rating, which meant some
evaluators at least knew who he was.
LINCOLN, MA — Mass Audubon has been awarded the coveted 4 - star
rating for the second - straight year by Charity Navigator, America's largest independent and most influential charity
evaluator.
Older kids and adults may be asked to take the 20 - question Jung self -
rating anxiety scale, which will let the
evaluator know how often the child feels nervous, anxiety, shakiness, and rapid heartbeat.
For the third year in a row, Mass Audubon has been awarded the coveted 4 - star
rating by Charity Navigator, America's largest independent and most influential charity
evaluator.
The echoes of Legislator Alden Wolfe emphatically bellowing «Who says» the county hospital needs to break even are still ringing in the collective ears of Rocklanders and apparently those echoes were also picked up by the
evaluators over at Moody's Investors Service, who've gone ahead and downgraded Rockland's credit
rating from A1 to A3, only -LSB-...]
In the meantime, they offer a few technological solutions, such as using smartphone sensors or human
evaluators to validate customer
ratings.
But in a new study by a Johns Hopkins Carey Business School professor,
evaluators using a balanced scorecard (BSC) in different case scenarios tended to award high
ratings and bonuses to employees who performed well financially, rather than to those who scored well in corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Narcissistic participants» pitches were consistently
rated as especially creative by
evaluators, but when independent
evaluators — unaware of which participants were self - obsessed — reviewed transcripts of the pitches, the narcissists» pitches were not
rated as more creative.
Charity Navigator, an independent charity
evaluator, gives Roswell Park Alliance Foundation a four - star
rating, which is their highest seal of approval.
LA JOLLA — For the sixth consecutive year, the Salk Institute's strong financial health and commitment to accountability and transparency has earned a coveted four - star (out of four stars)
rating from Charity Navigator, America's largest independent charity and nonprofit
evaluator.
Funds have also been allocated to help districts buy software
rated as superior by state
evaluators.
In other words, despite the fact that TES
evaluators tended to assign relatively high scores on average, there is a fair amount of variation from teacher to teacher that we can use to examine the relationship between TES
ratings and classroom effectiveness.
Using a similar definition of scholarship use (receipt of any scholarship assistance), the
evaluators of the federally funded Washington, D.C., voucher program estimated a positive impact of 21 percent on the high - school graduation
rates of study participants, 88 percent of whom were African Americans.
Using pass -
rate data, WGU looks at
evaluators who might be outliers among the rest, because «we don't want the student's chance for passing to be determined by which
evaluator is picked for the submission,» Fowler says.
The
evaluators reviewed guidelines after seeing the music video, then raised fingers to show how they would have
rated the example lesson.
The
evaluators went through pages of detailed benchmarks to decide a final
rating.
by Tom Kane, Amy Wooten, John Tyler, and Eric Taylor This study of Cincinnati's teacher evaluation system finds that the teachers who receive high
ratings from trained
evaluators who observe them are also more effective at promoting gains in student test scores.
Supovitz, MacGowan, and Slattery (1997) compared the
ratings given by Rochester classroom teachers and outside
evaluators.
Efforts to develop instruments that are resistant to
evaluators»
rating errors have failed to provide more reliable appraisals.
Artificial inflation is a term I recently coined to represent what is / was happening in Houston, and elsewhere (e.g., Tennessee), when district leaders (e.g., superintendents) mandate or force principals and other teacher effectiveness appraisers or
evaluators to align their observational
ratings of teachers» effectiveness with teachers» value - added scores, with the latter being (sometimes relentlessly) considered the «objective measure» around which all other measures (e.g., subjective observational measures) should revolve, or align.
Cuomo officials note that the governor secured some reform wins in 2015, including deals that made it more difficult for teachers to be
rated «highly effective,» a requirement that outside
evaluators assess teachers along with their principals, and a stricter timeline for failing schools to improve.
We present original survey data from an urban district illustrating that
evaluators perceive more than three times as many teachers in their schools to be below Proficient than they
rate as such.
Each individual selected by the district as a peer mentor must hold a valid professional certificate issued pursuant to this section, must have earned at least 3 years of teaching experience in prekindergarten through grade 12, and must have earned an effective or highly effective
rating on the prior year's performance evaluation under s. 1012.34 or be a peer
evaluator under the district's evaluation system approved under s. 1012.34.
They produce
ratings that are more consistent from
evaluator to
evaluator and that teachers are more likely to trust.
Danielson also created a set of rubrics for
evaluators that detail what teachers need to do (or not do) to earn «unsatisfactory,» «basic,» «proficient,» and «distinguished»
ratings in every skill category.
The independent
evaluator will observe the teacher at least three times during the school year and issue a report with his or her
rating of the teacher.»
Weston's teacher evaluation plan allows
evaluators to make professional judgments in determining holistic
ratings for teachers informed by «a preponderance of evidence based on multiple sources of data.»
But since
evaluators must assign a score, teaching is distilled to numbers,
ratings, and rankings, conveying a reductive nature to educators» professional worth and undermining their overall confidence in the system.
But teaching is complex, and
evaluators — who will mostly be principals and assistant principals — may make mistakes when they see teachers doing something well, or badly, and they don't have enough information from the
rating system to help them score what they see, she said.
According to PEAC members, some of the issues that PEAC and state officials should look at include the requirement that statewide test data be included in evaluations, the strict formulaic approach of the system that limits judgment and takes an inordinate amount of time away from teaching and learning, specified teacher
rating categories that interfere with improvement, and
evaluator training that may not ensure calibration.
Graduation
rates, parental opinion, and qualitative assessments by independent
evaluators.....
Principals will have the opportunity to set goals with their Chiefs before their first observation and also submit a self - assessment that will be used by the
evaluator in their overall
rating.
The actual distribution of formative and summative teacher evaluation
ratings in
evaluators» schools in the first (Panel A) and third (Panel B) year of a new teacher evaluation system
First, it assesses teacher effectiveness on multiple performance levels; that is, teachers are placed on a four or five point scale, as opposed to binary
ratings that limit the
evaluator to choosing between «satisfactory» or «unsatisfactory.»
Educators
rated Unsatisfactory are placed on improvement plans ranging from 30 days to one year in length developed by
evaluators to target the areas in which the educator's practice is unsatisfactory.