Sentences with phrase «evaluators use in child»

Parental alienation syndrome vs. parental alienation: which diagnosis should evaluators use in child - custody litigation?

Parental Alienation Syndrome vs. Parental Alienation: Which Diagnosis Should Evaluators Use in Child - Custody Litigation?

Parental Alienation Syndrome vs. Parental Alienation: Which Diagnosis Should Evaluators Use in Child - Custody Disputes?

Gardner, R.A. (2002) Parental alienation syndrome vs. parental alienation: Which diagnosis should evaluators use in child - custody disputes?

Not exact matches

Using your interview with the evaluator to recount your ex's poor choices and insensitivity in relation to your marriage will not help you gain custody of your child / ren.

Another variable would be «special developmental needs» of a child... In the case of relocation... the factor of extented family or family support... Without a research base, then it strikes me the evaluator is in the position of using common sense, belief, or value in asserting the importance of the factor.&raquIn the case of relocation... the factor of extented family or family support... Without a research base, then it strikes me the evaluator is in the position of using common sense, belief, or value in asserting the importance of the factor.&raquin the position of using common sense, belief, or value in asserting the importance of the factor.&raquin asserting the importance of the factor.»

A CNA (custody neutral assessment) is a program used in some NJ counties (such as Burlington) in which a family therapist meets with both parties (and sometimes the children, depending on their age) for one extended session and does an abbreviated evaluation of what parenting plan would be in the children's best interest, in that evaluator's opinion, based on the one - session meeting.

Using your interview with the evaluator to recount your ex's poor choices and insensitivity in relation to your marriage will not help you gain custody of your child / ren.

In reality, we know the cause: the use of a male supremacist evaluator who specializes in Munchausen and is paid substantial sums of money for this diagnosis as a way to take children from safe, protective mothers so they can be sent to live with abusive fatherIn reality, we know the cause: the use of a male supremacist evaluator who specializes in Munchausen and is paid substantial sums of money for this diagnosis as a way to take children from safe, protective mothers so they can be sent to live with abusive fatherin Munchausen and is paid substantial sums of money for this diagnosis as a way to take children from safe, protective mothers so they can be sent to live with abusive fathers.

It also is time to substantially limit the use of forensic experts and GALs in family court altogether because for the most part, MHPs, including child custody evaluators and their related forensic offshoots, in fact are unneeded, unhelpful, and undesirable in the vast majority of child custody cases.

WHEREAS, mothers are primarily pathologized and blamed for interfering with their children's attachment to their fathers and PAS is used by many evaluators and courts to discount children's fears in hostile and psychologically abusive situations as a form of entrapment, keeping the child from the protective parent; and