My interests (and blogging habits) trend toward the practical aspects of a much more embodied anthropology than is generally acceptable, a hermeneutic that takes its cue from the biblical authors themselves, and the continuing reformation of
evangelical ecclesiology.
So why is there
no evangelical ecclesiology or pastoral theology?
Not exact matches
With communities usually called
evangelical, Kasper notes, there is agreement on «fundamental dogmatic questions» along with continuing divergence on
ecclesiology, sacraments, and ministry.
The problem, however, is that after World War 11 a Party of fundamentalists again adopted the
evangelical label to express a «neo-evangeliical» agenda that included an intellectual apologetic for the theological articulation of classical Protestantism, a repudiation of fundamentalist separatism in favor of a more inclusive
ecclesiology, and a renewed social agenda.
According to Alan J. Bailyes, there were five theological issues between the ecumenical and
evangelical positions: Church and world, the nature of conversion, Gospel and culture, Christology, and hermeneutics.3 Bailyes explains that a sound and solid
ecclesiology has long been a weak link in the
evangelical chain of theology, «coming a poor second or cven third behind its soteriology with its emphasis upon the individual and his / her relationship with God.
It is frequently observed that the most divisive disagreement between
evangelicals and Catholics is in the area of
ecclesiology, or the doctrine of the Church.
Dulles's renowned work on
ecclesiology informed the ECT dialogue and stressed the importance of seeking full visible unity within the body of Christ while emphasizing spiritual ecumenism and intermediate steps that Catholic and
evangelicals could — and should — take together in the meantime.