Drawing on themes he explicated in his 2004 book The Rise of Evangelicalism, Noll suggests instead that
evangelicalism began as a creative religious response to the situation of its time.
The global vision of American
evangelicalism began in an improbable place, 1950s South Korea, as Americans encountered people like Pun Hui Pak.
(James 1:27) The global vision of American
evangelicalism began in an improbable place, 1950s South Korea, as Americans encountered....
My journey with
evangelicalism began around the age of 16.
But in terms of priorities, focus, and direction, assumed
evangelicalism begins to give gradually increasing energy to concerns other than the gospel and key evangelical distinctives, to gradually elevate secondary issues to a primary level, to be increasingly worried about how it is perceived by others and to allow itself to be increasingly influenced both in content and method by the prevailing culture of the day.
Not exact matches
Wells
begins by positing two kinds of spirituality present within
evangelicalism, distinguished in his view not so much by different doctrinal starting - points as differing priorities assigned to moral reasoning.
As David Gibson said in a classic essay, Assumed
Evangelicalism: Some Reflections en route to Denying the Gospel, movements
begin by proclaiming the gospel, pass through a phase of assuming it but not making it central, and end by rejecting and denying it.
So here's the question: Do you think that «
evangelicalism» is
beginning to take on the same negative connotation as «fundamentalism»?
We don't like labels to
begin with, and
evangelicalism already carries a lot of political and theological baggage.
Thus the new evangelization that marked the
beginnings of
Evangelicalism as a renewal movement within Christianity
began on premises similar to those outlined by Weigel.
Thus
began the flowering of «
evangelicalism,» the «laxist tendency.»
As many have noted elsewhere,
evangelicalism has become so intertwined with conservative politics that it can be hard to tell at times where Republicanism
begins and
evangelicalism ends.
He uses Carl F. H. Henry's concerns about the direction of
evangelicalism in the years just before the current era of conversations about mission, missions, missional, and missiology all
began in our brave post-modern or late - modern world.
Evangelicals have borrowed tools for heuristic purposes and made the
beginnings of a theological synthesis from storehouses other than the ones used by scholastic
evangelicalism — Baconianism, Ramism, Scottish common sense realism.
But when I
began writing about gender equality in
evangelicalism, it became apparent to me that no matter how careful my tone, no matter how reasoned my arguments, no matter how gentle my critique, my work would inevitably be characterized as «divisive.»
The meta - doctrine of
Evangelicalism (discovered by Ernst Troeltsch long ago) is the teaching that the normal
beginning of genuine Christian life is spiritual transformation.