Indeed enhanced
evaporation of water vapour into the atmosphere is conventionally regarded as an aggravating factor because water vapour is itself a greenhouse gas (see below about that).
Not exact matches
2) In a confined volume, an increase in
evaporation will result in an increased
vapour pressure
of H2O in the atmosphere above the
water surface.
The model considers all relevant feedback processes caused by changes
of water vapour, lapse - rate, surface albedo or convection and
evaporation.
It involves physical conditions which set the stage for
evaporation, convection, condensation
of water vapour, formation
of clouds, and precipitation.
In GCMs, the global mean
evaporation changes closely balance the precipitation change, but not locally because
of changes in the atmospheric transport
of water vapour.
The conversion
of a
water molecule to a
water vapour molecule involves a huge energy transfer from
water to air so
evaporation alone is a substantial factor.
Water vapour is lighter than air once formed by the acquisition
of the latent heat
of evaporation so no additional radiative energy needs to be acquired to enable it to rise within the Earth's gravitational field.
Evaporation will commence long before this temperature is reached and were it not for the
water vapour condensing on the inside
of the container you would have clouds.
And even though on average more warmth will mean more
evaporation, and therefore more
water vapour in the atmosphere and more precipitation in some
of those zones that already have ample rainfall, the pattern could be different in the arid lands.
The theory is that increasing CO2 will cause a small bit
of warming and this will increase
evaporation rates (which occur fastest in the tropics) and dumps more
water vapour in the atmosphere (
water vapour is by far a more potent greenhouse gas than CO2) and this feedback amplification is meant to continue until Earth settles down and finds a new equilibrium temperature.
These effects are relatively well understood in the lowest level
of the atmosphere, the troposphere, where increased warming leads to greater
evaporation, causing more
water vapour and so further warming, although this is offset to some extent through the formation
of clouds that reflect incoming sunlight back into space.
As the planet warms, increasing levels
of water vapour in the atmosphere caused by higher
evaporation levels form more clouds and snow increasing the albedo
of the planet, reflecting heat back into space more efficiently, thus working to regulate the temperature downward.
If
water vapour feedback was positive then due to the increased
evaporation spurred on by the original warming in the MWP there should have ensued a period
of elevated temperatures for thousands
of years until the cooling
of the Holocene as we dip into the next glacial period overwhelmed the positive
water vapour forcing.
It is not «conduction» but exchange
of radiation; if you keep your hands parallel at a distance
of some cm the right hand does not (radiatively) «warm» the left hand or vice versa albeit at 33 °C skin temperature they exchange some hundreds
of W / m ² (about 500 W / m ²) The solar radiation reaching the surface (for 71 %
of the surface, the oceans) is lost by
evaporation (or evapotranspiration
of the vegetation), plus some convection (20 W / ²) and some radiation reaching the cosmos directly through the window 8µm to 12 µm (about 20 W / m ² «global» average); only the radiative heat flow surface to air (absorbed by the air) is negligible (plus or minus); the non radiative (latent heat, sensible heat) are transferred for surface to air and compensate for a part
of the heat lost to the cosmos by the upper layer
of the
water vapour displayed on figure 6 - C.
At the surface, increased pressure from injecting
water vapour into a parcel
of air via
evaporation causes the parcel to rise so that surface pressure below it falls.
i) That parcel
of air can be caused to expand relative to adjoining air parcels either by direct input
of more solar energy where insolation is uneven (as it always is) or indirectly by the injection
of potential energy in the form
of latent heat
of evaporation carried by
water vapour.
If CO2 concentration is increased and we assume no cloud or
water vapour feedbacks (however
evaporation is NOT a feedback — it is always a major determinant
of surface temperature.)
However, in the deep tropics, where the theoretical effects on the surface energy budget
of temperature - driven changes in
evaporation and
water vapour are particularly strong, there is a near quarter century record
of both SST and tas from the Tropical Atmosphere Ocean array
of fixed buoys in the Pacific ocean.
However the effect
of downwelling infrared is always to use up all the infrared in increasing the temperature
of the ocean surface molecules whilst leaving nothing in reserve to provide the extra energy required (the latent heat
of evaporation) when the change
of state occurs from
water to
vapour.
In effect the
evaporation sucks energy from the oceans against the thermal gradient within the ocean bulk and despite the warming
of the topmost molecules caused by infra red radiation and then expels it to the air in the form
of latent heat carried by
water vapour.
More DLR increases
Evaporation and that increases the amount
of latent heat required and also increases upward Convection because
water vapour is lighter than air.
In principle, an extreme moist greenhouse might cause an instability with
water vapour preventing radiation to space
of all absorbed solar energy, resulting in very high surface temperature and
evaporation of the ocean [105].
Instead it is a composite
of the rates
of evaporation and condensation, melting and freezing and thus the average time that a
water molecule remains in the air in
vapour form, or in the ocean as a liquid or in ice and snow as a solid.
There is next to nohing nothing in the TAR on precipitation modelling yet the cycle
of evaporation >
water vapour > clouds > precipitation is at the heart
of quantifying the anthropogenic impact.