Hitler for that matter was not
even a practicing Christian, stop giving lame excuse.
Not exact matches
I have no idea what AvdBerg
practices, but he BELIEVES that his interpretations of scripture are so obviously the true ones that they aren't
even interpretations, which makes it all the odder that so many hundreds of millions if not billions of
christians over the centuries apparently missed these supposedly transparent truths.
I am neither a
christian or muslim but what right do
christians have in making fun of muslims and their books when so much trash exists in their houses only difference being that other religions are open about their
practices and
even accept their mistakes..
... What has happened over time is that people were forced to believe in the one of the Abrahamic faiths through Holy wars, torture, Crusades and Inquisitions, and as people
practiced this chosen people ideology, whether
Christian, Catholic, Jew or Muslim, which was built on the principle of remaining segregated from the un-chosen, their faith urged them to remain segregated, where they lived and never to marry anyone outside their faith... and
even in death there is a history of segregation which to this day continues, try having a non Jewish person buried in Jewish cemetery.
They acknowledge the God of Israel,
even though they do not know his name, just as truly as other
Christians deny him when, according to the Q tradition, they perform wonders in the name of Jesus while
practicing lawlessness.
I have
even declined the opportunity to be more involved in some progressive
Christian events, because labels like Emergent and Progressive do not reflect my theological positions and do not always FIT with how I see or
practice faith.
Maybe the spread of Buddhist
practices in the West will
even be of help to
Christians!»
Any
Christians caught publicly
practicing their faith can be sent to hard labour camp, but they can also be sentenced if a family member was caught
practicing their faith or
even if they become
Christian and move to China, they can still be sent back and imprisoned, according to the report.
Noddings finds the Judeo -
Christian tradition especially culpable in women's denigration: there is the Adam and Eve story, with Eve held responsible for accepting the serpent's temptation and leading man to sin; the Old Testament «uncleanness» references and
practices; the long history of burning witches;
even the veneration of the Virgin Mary.
If you believe in The Bible, as we do, being
Christians, then this is true: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Corinthians+15:28-30&version=NIV or you can read it here also: http://www.lds.org/scriptures/nt/1-cor/15.29?lang=eng#28 So,
even though CNN wants to ridicule a Gospel principle, for us, LDS member, we have nothing to hide, it's in the Bible and at the time of Christ that was a
practice that was in place as part of the Gospel of Christ.
The
Christian must normally adopt an analogous attitude in theory and
practice in regard to teachings and moral precepts of the Church which are put forward authoritatively by the Church,
even if not as irrevocable dogma.
The atheist is there to point out the fact that
christians did not create ANY of their
practices or rituals, not
even christmas.
Still, it should be noted that the prayer
practice in Greece was
even more egregiously exclusive and sectarian, with all the prayers over a nine year period being given by
Christians.
Take it from a
practicing and believing
Christian, or better yet, allow me to use the words of George Carlin: «In the BS department,
even a businessman can't hold a candle to a clergyman.»
While
practicing Christians may be justifiably disappointed in a sterilized «happy holidays» from their grocer,
even this greeting extends something beyond the all - too - human midwinter bacchanalia historically provided by Saturnalia and the Mithraic birth, or today by New Year's Eve.
Even when I was a believing and
practicing Christian, I realized that regardless of their beliefs, doctors still saved lives, made discoveries, scientists still learned more about the world we live in... the idea that all knowledge has to be attached to the «creator» or it is somehow tainted or suspect, just doesn't pan out when you look at it logically.
According to the document «Towards Common Witness» some of the characteristics which distinguish proselytism from
Christian witness are: unfair criticism of caricaturing of the doctrines, beliefs and
practices of another church; presenting one's church or confession as «the true church»; the use of humanitarian aid, educational opportunities or moral and psychological pressure, to induce people to change their affiliation; exploiting people's loneliness,
even disillusionment with their own church in order to «convert» them.
Today around the world, the Church is alive and flourishing in places like North Korea, Sudan, Pakistan, Eritrea, Nigeria, Vietnam, Kenya, India, Ethiopia, China and more — despite restrictive and
even oppressive violent government policies and
practices against
Christians.
I have
even heard some say that the pagan writings and traditions were changed to match the
Christian beliefs and
practices, and that is why there are similarities.
Why didn't the president himself stand up for the human rights of the
Christian missionaries and medical team in Afghanistan, including six Americans, to
practice medicine and their faith,
even after they were murdered by Islamic extremists?
Even after the birth of the church in Acts 2, the vast majority of the early Christians were Jewish, and most of the Gentiles who converted were «God fearers» which means that they knew and respected the teachings of Judaism, and even followed many of the Jewish traditions and practices (cf. Acts 10
Even after the birth of the church in Acts 2, the vast majority of the early
Christians were Jewish, and most of the Gentiles who converted were «God fearers» which means that they knew and respected the teachings of Judaism, and
even followed many of the Jewish traditions and practices (cf. Acts 10
even followed many of the Jewish traditions and
practices (cf. Acts 10:2).
Even as conservative a Catholic moral theologian as Thomas J. O'Donnell admits that AIH was an open question in theory and in
practice before 1949 (see Medicine and
Christian Morality [Alba House, 1976], p. 266).
No modem theologian can continue to assume that European and North American modes of
Christian thought and
practice can,
even in principle, any longer suffice for an emerging world church.
If you actually listened, you might realize that the pontiff has a DUTY to call into question
practices that run counter to His teachings,
even if that means placing the
Christian value system above your personal economic value system.
Even though specific
Christian beliefs were unknown in Athens,
Christian thinkers used resources which were far less internally consistent than process thought to express religious meanings, defend
practices, doctrines, and so forth.
We have become way too much eyeball people as
Christians assume that those who don't live according to the way they do they are unsaved, we have created this judgemental relationship which hurts peoples fellowship with God, there are no litmus tests for people that believe in Jesus, which is why we are called to not judge others, and people use James 2:14, and 1 John's verse of those who
practices righteousness are righteous
even though I think it's talking about earthly righteousness toward people that we as
Christians should show because there is a lost world out there that needs are help and these doctrines of guilt, condemnation, anger, and judgement aren't helping in fact they are doing the opposite, just like how in James it's justification towards man.
So
Christian practice believes that human bodies,
even after death, mediate God's grace.»
Long before this time,
Christians who faced martyrdom under the persecutions of the Roman emperors rather than deny Christ met this problem in
practice,
even as many of our contemporaries have been forced to in our own day.
So the
practice is not a particularly «
Christian» or
even a «religious» one.
Also,
Christians and Jews at the time used to stone adulterers to death as well;
even today, most Republicans support the
practice.
The
practice caught on, and Sunday eventually became known as the «
Christian» Sabbath —
even though Jesus Himself observed Sabbath on the last day of the week... Saturday.
If those who are
practicing evil are not
even bothered to do it openly, I don't see why a
Christian should be ashamed about doing something relating to his / her faith in Christ.
Our
practice is the only sure evidence,
even to ourselves, that we are genuinely
Christians.
To a great extent this taboo probably
even inhibited the
practice of husbands and wives (this is still true of a surprising number of people reared in the Judeo -
Christian taboo system).
Even the most mystical of
Christian mystics
practiced silence so as to attend more closely to the ever - speaking God.
Still they realize that members of other
Christian churches challenge the sufficiency, or
even the rectitude, of their teaching and
practice.
The claim of the
Christian Church to make its voice heard in matters of politics and economics is very widely resented,
even by those who are
Christian in personal belief and in devotional
practice.
What is
even more terrifying is if any Muslim that
practices Islam... has a grudge against any
Christian... what's stopping them from making a false claim against a
Christian, of blasphemy?
For many,
even today, the attitudes and
practices of
Christian missionaries have much to do with their opposition to conversion.
God has provided for non-Christians a different government outside the
Christian estate and God's kingdom, and has subjected them to the sword, so that
even though they would do so, they can not
practice their wickedness, and that, if they do they may not do it without fear nor in peace and prosperity... 73
And most
Christians don't
even practice the worship correctly.
They want freedom to
practice THEIR religion in the US yet they harrass
Christians and
even other Jews who are not conservative.
Even more radically, the fact that the
practice of worship of God inherently requires critical self - reflection means that it inherently requires critical examination of whether and why we should engage ourselves in the
Christian thing at all, and hence in the common life of this or any congregation.
Having a group committed to a standard of
practice or a positive series of actions, perhaps prayer and study and
even other
Christian disciplines is the best approach.
Even on this basis the Catholic nowadays is himself very often, and in the most important questions, in a situation which in
practice resembles the one assumed to be always and necessarily present by those who advocate a
Christian situation ethics.
But he then proceeds to explain that there are, in
practice, no circumstances under which we are justified in identifying an anti-progressive politician as sufficiently wicked not to deserve
Christian votes,
even if he is a «dark Machiavellian.»
The ecclesiastical trial of Father William Wendt in Washington, D.C., over the issue of women's orders symbolized that once the nature of authority is challenged,
even in church governance, the very basis of traditional
Christian thought and
practice crumbles.
Some
Christians and theologians, open to the world of cultural and religious pluralism, fascinated by it and eager to experiment alternative ways of
practicing their faith, are willing to go a second mile, a third mile,
even any number of miles, with their new found friends and neighbors of other faiths.
Perhaps if more
Christians did their corporal acts of mercy in secular humanitarian institutions, or if we
practiced Gospel ethics in the workplace
even though it put a promotion or
even our job at risk, the influence of the Gospel would be more widely spread.
I am a
practicing Christian —
even a red state one according to the CNN poll — but I'm not interested in making everyone believe exactly as I do.