Not exact matches
A review of studies suggests
even where the impact of minimum wage increases is not «benign,» job loss
evidence has to be weighed
against what happens to the purchasing power of the remaining workers.
In fact, these flaws are sufficient to not only invalidate the most compelling
evidence against the hot hand, but
even to vindicate the belief in streakiness.
Even if you accept Zuckerberg's proposition that Facebook is making the world «more open and connected» — rather than recognize the
evidence it's dividing us into ever more insulated and polarized digital tribes — you still have to weigh that
against the damage it has caused.
To say that evolution was «proven» 100 years ago is to disregard the fact that
even Darwin doubted his own contentions (as he states in origin of species), for every bit of scientific
evidence for evolution there is scientific
evidence against it.
You have a book that you won't budge from
even when all
evidence is
against it.
For example,
against both dualism and reductionistic determinism and in favor of the pancreationist, panexperientialist view that the actual world is made up exhaustively of partially self - determining, experiencing events, there is considerable
evidence, such as the fact that a lack of complete determinism seems to hold
even at the most elementary level of nature; that bacteria seem to make decisions based upon memory; that there appears to be no place to draw an absolute line between living and nonliving things, and between experiencing and nonexperiencing ones; and that physics shows nature to be most fundamentally a complex of events (not of enduring substances).
One can lay out all the
evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case
against every single religion on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view,
even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very scriptures they they base their beliefs on.
Even more to the point you have Hitler, a man who evoked god countless times in his speeches, had the nazis were belt buckles that said «God with us» and you see this as mountains of
evidence AGAINST him being a christian?
If you care to apply the proper word (believe) to how you feel about or toward other minds and
evidence, then we would not
even be having this discussion, for why would I argue
against your accurate description of what you believe?
One can lay out all the
evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case
against every single religion on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view,
even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very scriptures they base their beliefs on.
There's plenty of proof and your refusal to
even make an attempt to look at it will be
evidence against you.
The Turkish government has not provided documentation to reveal the source of the claim,
evidence against him, or
even to which organization he allegedly belongs.
For example the flying spaghetti monster, you can not prove it is impossible; but, there is so much
evidence against it and so little
evidence for it that
even you might call it impossible
The fact that you can't figure out how to write «psychiatrists» or
even «shrinks», but have to use the pathetic «physic», which doesn't make any sense at all, is
evidence that you're not bright enough to make a cogent argument
against gay marriage.
Even the later rewriting of the records, pushing back the command
against images into the law of Moses and denying in every way the allowance of idols, did not destroy the plain
evidence of Yahweh's physical representation in the early days.
And
even Blackmun might have come to see that his argument could not have stood up
against the array of empirical
evidence that formed that brief for the state of Texas.
It's shocking that in her editorial and
even her book, «Unprotected Texts,» Knust ignores a mountain of
evidence against her positions.
You said: «
Even if we were on the same plane with angels, you are perfect
evidence, for those who believe, of an intelligent man rebelling
against God making it very reasonable to believe in an «intelligent» angel rebelling
against God.»
I don't think it could be considered
even a 50/50 decision where Wenger could «call the ref's integrity into question» and it certainly could not be called «farcical» and be used as
evidence of a vendetta
against Arsenal by the officials.
The
evidence isn't just in the league table, the goals for and
against and the way
even defensive minded teams have been unable to shut down United using exactly the same tactics that Wenger and the rest of the Arsenal squad are very publicly unable to cope with.
What really galls me is that Wenger gets paid 8 million a year to manage a side and yet
even the lowest paid bin man who is an arsenal fan can see that OG and Theo are NOT nor will they EVER be up to scratch un yet Wenger persisits
against all the
evidence because he so desperately wants to prove the world wrong about either or both of the afore mentioned.
Even now when there's so much factual
evidence against Wenger!
The Frenchman
even repeated the offence this week when he accused Eden Hazard of diving and accusing the ref of awarding a penalty
against the Gunners
against the
evidence, and just about every article since has been about referees decisions, rather than discussing the actual football.
But the man's got to do better at the goal; the difference needed to win
against the highest level sides has not been in
evidence with Giroud —
even as he says this very week that he is now able to convert
against those sides.
But if I have learned anything in my adult life, it is that sometimes you have to trick yourself into taking yourself seriously,
even if all the
evidence is piled up
against you.
Just because some or
even many children do not
evidence verbal awareness or displeasure at being discriminated
against, put down, and dominated doesn't mean they don't suffer along with their parents (and Amber - well put on how that plays out for many of us carers).
Some of their
evidence even suggests that some babies who sleep with or near their mothers might gain a measure of insurance
against Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS).
Actually,
evidence suggests that breastfeeding may protect the woman
against the development of osteoporosis
even if she does not take extra calcium.
Anecdotaly, however, there is no
evidence that Hillary Clinton is leading
against Republican candidates among women, and may
even be leading by less than Obama did.
«Although finding that the Supreme Court's McDonnell decision issued after Silver's conviction required a different legal instruction to the jury, the Second Circuit also held that the
evidence presented at the trial was sufficient to prove all the crimes charged
against Silver,
even under the new legal standard.»
«The Second Circuit also held that the
evidence presented at the trial was sufficient to prove all the crimes charged
against Silver,
even under the new legal standard,» the former prosecutor wrote in a statement.
His longtime colleague, Acting U.S. Attorney Joon Kim, said that «the
evidence presented at the trial was sufficient to prove all the crimes charged
against Silver,
even under the new legal standard.»
«Although finding that the Supreme Court's McDonnell decision issued after Silver's conviction required a different legal instruction to the jury, the Second Circuit also held that the
evidence presented at the trial was sufficient to prove all the crimes charged
against Silver,
even under the new legal standard,» Kim's statement reads, in part.
Evidence «was sufficient to prove all the crimes charged
against Silver,
even under the new legal standard.»
During a House of Commons debate on 7 July 2009, Davis accused the UK government of outsourcing torture, by allowing Rangzieb Ahmed to leave the country (
even though the government had
evidence against Ahmed, upon which Ahmed was later convicted for terrorism) to Pakistan, where it is said the Inter-Services Intelligence was given the go ahead by the British intelligence agencies to torture Ahmed.
According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, the city's Education Department repeatedly refused to take disciplinary action
against the principal, allowing her to stay at the helm
even after being warned that there was
evidence of discrimination by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Even the usually super-loyal shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry declared in the Commons that there was «prima facie
evidence»
against Russia, and supported all the measures announced by the government in response to it.
Meanwhile, some of them have made useful statements while a few have declined
even with the glaring
evidences that were found
against them in terms of material cash, documents and property recovered pointing to their compromise.
Torture survivors remained in detention, despite clear
evidence of their vulnerability and
even though the Home Office has specific guidelines
against this practice.
If a jury decides that the prosecution has manufactured
evidence against a defendant, are they entitled to find a defendant not guilty,
even if they think that the defendant committed the crime they...
He is the most investigated politician, yet no
evidence of corruption was established
against him —
even in the celebrated William Jefferson trial in the United States.
The remark referenced the former blue - ribbon panel that Cuomo created in 2013 under the state's Moreland Act — before abruptly pulling the plug as it was targeting political donors,
even as it gathered incriminating
evidence against then - Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and state Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos.
«Although finding that the Supreme Court's McDonnell decision issued after Silver's conviction required a different legal instruction to the jury, the Second Circuit also held that the
evidence presented at the trial was sufficient to prove all the crimes charged
against Silver,
even under the new legal standard,» Kim's statement said.
He shut the commission down
even as it was developing key
evidence against Sheldon Silver and Dean Skelos, the two leaders of the state Legislature — and it's obvious he did it at their request, in exchange for other concessions in Albany's endless bargaining.
[94] New York Post columnist Fredric U. Dicker confronted Paladino at a meeting of the New York State Business Council later that
evening and insisted that Paladino produce
evidence about any accusations
against Cuomo, but Paladino then alleged the Post had followed and photographed Paladino's daughter several days prior to the appearance, and demanded that Dicker not do it again or he would «take him out».
But the acquaintance, who the New York Post identified as businessman Eric Hu, began cooperating with federal investigators and
even wore a wire to build
evidence against Meng.
Although Merck's vaccine will be marketed only for cervical cancer, preliminary
evidence suggests it may also be effective
against penile, anal, and vulvar cancers and
even certain cancers of the head and neck.
In the nineteenth century, Uncle Tom's Cabin was widely credited with shifting public opinion
against slavery, but to date, there has been sparse
evidence that fictional stories,
even very popular ones, can influence political opinion.
Studies have found
evidence for various health benefits of drinking coffee in recent years, from helping to fend off diabetes, heart disease and stroke to protecting
against depression and Alzheimer's disease — and
even, ironically, liver cancer (SN: 10/3/15, p. 16).
And while he would, occasionally, declare himself intrigued or
even «staggered» by some fresh piece of
evidence against him, he would always conclude that, all things considered, he was still right and everyone else was wrong.