Sentences with phrase «even agree about»

They might even agree about a problem — say, fixing slow Bitcoin transactions — but disagree about how to solve it — larger blocks (and just how large), dynamic blocks, changing how the information is stored, transmitted, and so on.

Quite apart from the law's struggles to define terms external to it, and translation difficulties, 2400 years after Plato, we can even agree about what law is.

While ocean models disagree about future carbon uptake rates, terrestrial models do not even agree about the sign of future carbon exchange, with some showing continued uptake, and others indicating weakening uptake or even transitioning to sources.

Part of the problem is that many therapists can't even agree about the definition and treatment of Internet infidelity, which makes addressing trust, accountability and the betrayed partner's ability to express his or her feelings challenging.

Part of the problem is that few of us, including therapists, can even agree about the definition of Internet infidelity.

They might even agree about a problem — say, fixing slow Bitcoin transactions — but disagree about how to solve it — larger blocks (and just how large), dynamic blocks, changing how the information is stored, transmitted, and so on.

Not exact matches

Instead, empathize with their approach to life, which you can do even if you don't agree with their beliefs, and then reciprocate by revealing more about yourself.

Organized labour, small business and pension experts are at odds about fixing the pension system — that is, if they even agree it's broken.

«Bespoke is about making a suit from scratch the way the client likes it — even if it means doing things we don't agree with,» he says.

Acknowledge the inappropriateness of the behavior in question: Even if you are dealing with someone who is upset about something that you think is petty, you most likely will agree on some level that the way the customer was treated was inappropriate.

Even more importantly, there's no sway and no confusion when you're talking about performance against previously agreed - upon goals and standards.

Matt Ambrose agrees — even your About page isn't really about you atAbout page isn't really about you atabout you at all!

In the United States Lyft is telling investors it «will have boosted its share of U.S. ride - hailing business some 61 percent by the end of the year, climbing to about a third of the market»; what is even more damaging is Lyft's partnership with Waymo, which made Lyft the best way to invest in Google's self - driving technology — Google apparently agreed, leading a $ 1.5 billion investment that Lyft announced this week.

Ross Eisenbrey of the Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank based in Washington, said would - be interns should think twice about agreeing to work without pay, even to get a foot in the door.

I'd look into cheaper housing, cheaper vehicle and I agree w / the point about the college being one son needs to step up on and making even small savings, shelter, food and transportation the main focus of the budget.

A voter - profiling company was able to harvest data of 50 million Facebook profiles even though only about 270,000 users agreed to hand over their information.

Even if you agree with him about how much investment will increase, the assumptions underlying his job numbers are misleading.

I will argue that most economists have an incoherent understanding of China's rebalancing needs, and for this reason many if not most of the reform proposals of the past few years, about which economists widely agree and even celebrate, are in many if not most cases largely irrelevant.

«Lori was so persistent, so I agreed to meet with her even though I felt like I was too small for her to care about.»

At some point, we'd actually have to agree to disagree that homosexuality is a sin, and therefore not prejudice decisions about ministry and even marriage on being gay.

It's fine if you don't agree, but you shouldn't bash when you don't even know what you are talking about.

How about you how many are true Christians, you can not even agree among the different sects until it is time to brag about how numerous you all are.

So, for example, Christians, for example, can't even agree amongst themselves about a single interpretation of the bible (oh, that's right, there is more than one bible!).

The media - strategy component is that many nonwhite and younger voters, based on their media consumption patterns, never even hear about when they do agree with conservatives.

Whatever one thinks about sex, the one thing we can agree on is that more people are having more sex than ever — even in the Church.

As a human being, and particularly as a Christian, I assume you agree with me that human beings are fallible, and that we can be wrong even about things which we deeply and passionately believe to be true.

Second, even if they agreed to that, they would not understand that the Old Testament was about the law and not mercy.

I suppose it could be that my friends are far more easygoing than I am about differences, so they just agree (even if they don't agree) and then go about their business not really caring what happens later.

Not that I don't agree with you that much of the modern world has been brought about because of faith, even / especially religious faith.

THEY can't even agree on important stuff... it allows for endless escape holes when they get pinned in debates about God with atheist.)

So while I agree that this is an example of how long some of these teachings went, even here they were interactive discussions, and while we can not be certain, the discussion was probably about the interpretation and application of biblical texts.

Even the philosophers are agreed about the fact of it.

And even if all rough correlations could be made smooth by convoluted arguments about cloud covers and the like, the two Genesis accounts themselves, taken as chronologies, do not agree.

At a recent gathering hosted by The Samuel Bronfman Foundation, which asked precisely that question, just about the only thing the group of leading Jewish scholars, writers, rabbis, and professors could agree on was that there is no longer one story, narrative, or idea that could hold the totality or even a majority of Jews together.

Rex i do nt disagree that the Lord is returning i am looking forward to that nor about John the baptist but i am saved i think it is dangerous to tell people they are not saved by a few comments you do nt agree with.whether you know the word well or go to church or even do good works is no guarantee that you are saved that just means you are religious.It is only by faith in Jesus Christ that all are saved and not by works brentnz

Even tho im gay, i agree with fred, except: water baptism, protesting funerals, and thats about it, folks.

Again, you may disagree with any of the premises, you may disagree that you are dumb, that you don't know what you are talking about, that God exists and loves everyone, and fine, even if the logic is perfect, the conclusion isn't valid for you, since you don't agree with the premises.

But in significant ways they do not have the same understanding about him, even though they also agree in significant ways.

While I do appreciate the message of this article, and also agree there is no specific verse about guns themselves, how on earth can anyone think, even for a minute, that Jesus would be pro-gun?

«But if Christians don't even agree on what the goal is, how can we talk about Christianity at all.

If you look back i mention several times that I am telling you why the catholic church doesn't accept gay marriage, I never said that this was my personal opinion about it or even that I completely agree with the catechism (sorry for my spelling errors).

Even some of his interpretivist compatriots may have reservations about portions of Gangi's argument, but all will agree that this volume is a spirited and provocative contribution to one of our most important national debates.

Id agree with you, except that even today theres a story about a Muslim actress from the Harry Potter movies being beaten by her father and brothers for the sin of — having a boyfriend.

What makes you think that a monk who wrote the bible 1000 years ago (when most people were illiterate) knows anything more about a man named Jesus who lived 2000 years than we do today, when we all can't even agree on where President Obama came from today?

Even when Dianna and I don't agree 100 %, Dianna always engages with kindness, intelligence, and respect, which is why I continue to read her blog religiously and why I'm especially excited about the February 10 release of her first book, Damaged Goods: New Perspectives on Christian Purity....

I don't agree with what I think and I'm not even sure about anything about me anymore.

I also agree with your cautions about the book; even their revised statement is going too far.

lolz... let's see about that... if you want to know that truth, search for it... i promise you, you'll find it... i'm not saying to ready the Bible or anything, even science agrees that a Supreme being exist...

what Hartshorne accomplished, even when others do not agree with his form of theism, is to hold the prism of the human intellect up to the divine light, the better to display the full spectrum of responsible thinking about God.

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....