Not exact matches
So, Facebook
agrees to host some ads
on their site for a hefty fee and boom, an income is born,
even though Facebook doesn't really sell
anything.
we don't
agree on anything... not
even gods love, which is pretty fundamental to a faith stance.
The truth is that the only things the stories
agree on it that someone went to the tomb and claimed it was empty There is absolutely no agreement
on anything else, which discredits
even the claim that Mary went there at it was empty — too many lies.
What makes you think that a monk who wrote the bible 1000 years ago (when most people were illiterate) knows
anything more about a man named Jesus who lived 2000 years than we do today, when we all can't
even agree on where President Obama came from today?
(i) the question of gay rights — funny I
agree with gay rights, must be a political debate at its heart (ii) a wonan's right to choose — funny I
agree with this, see above thought (iii) teaching evolution in school — again I
agree (iv) my ability to buy a glass of wine
on Sunday — definitely politics here (v) immunizing teens against HPV — got my kids immunized, not
even politics here (vi) population control — this is religions fault??? no this is cultural (vii) assisted suicide at end of life —
agree with that, still have my religion (viii) global warmning —
agree it needs to get fixed, doesn't have
anything to do with religion
Perhaps the internet is doing all of the above and more: encouraging and unifying small religious and other movements; further facilitating scientific unification across geographic proximity, if not also creating new scientific theories and concepts; fostering the rise of new forms of spiritual irrationalism such as those discussed in Wendy Kaminer's wild book, Sleeping with Extra-Terrestrials; focusing the public
even more
on particular public personas in news, sports and everything else; creating new classes of investors who are willing to publish online just about
anything, regardless of whether or not they
agree with it; germinating new technological ideas that are luring capitalists who hold unreasonable expectations of financial bonanzas.
We all know that Wenger doesn't like
agreeing with the fans
on anything even if the whole world is saying the same thing as the fans.
Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when
on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey -
Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do
anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But
on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight
on his shoulders
on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i
agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.
On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely
on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility
Well I am an Arsenal supporter, and
even if I don't necessarily
agree with Wenger's politics, I think people tend to forget about the fact that we support Arsenal the club, and should stick with our players and cheer them
on, they are the ones playing, winning and losing, and us giving them a hard time doesn't help
anything but to bring their confidence down.
Even the Daily Mail ended up
agreeing with Farron
on the issue — probably the first time I can remember that paper
agreeing with the Liberal Democrats
on anything.
It seems to work OK but, as far as I know, instead of degenerating into some sort of free - for - all chaos where nobody ever
agrees on anything, it just increases the role of the government
even more as
even if anybody can ask questions or make proposals, it's mostly those that have been prepared by officials that end up being adopted.
Landlords and tenants rarely
agree on anything in NYC, but both sides say this year the Rent Guidelines Board will likely enact another rent freeze — or
even a rent rollback.
Landlords and tenants rarely
agree on anything in this city, but both sides say this year the Rent Guidelines Board will likely enact another rent freeze — or
even a (gasp!)
For if ardent greens and out - and - out sceptics can
agree on anything, it is that Kyoto will not
even come close to solving the problem of climate change.
i
agree whenever husband offers to let you buy clothes, you always take him up
on that offer
even if you don't need
anything but growing bump yes new clothes for sure!!
The End of Anger: A New Generation's Take
on Race and Rage by Ellis Cose Ecco Books Hardcover, $ 24.99 320 pages ISBN: 978 -0-06-199855-3 Book Review by Kam Williams «The End of Anger is an exploration of why it is that many blacks are feeling optimistic these days... [This] is a book about success — about a particularly privileged,
even indulged, group of African - Americans whose experiences in many respects are far from the norm... In January 2009,
on the eve of President Barack Obama's inauguration, a CNN poll found that 69 % of blacks
agreed that Martin Luther King's vision had been fulfilled... The election of an African - American president was a Rubicon to be crossed... No longer are there any excuses for denying blacks
anything or for blacks denying themselves the opportunity to aim as high as they wish.»
When anyone can say
anything they like, we can't
even pretend most of us
agree on the truth of most assertions any more.
The reason is that there are so many risks: government regulations of short - selling (SEC Rule 204), special government regulations put in place during market panics (e.g. the 2008 SEC ban
on short selling financials), forced buy - ins, unlimited losses, debt to the brokerage, interest one is charged for being short which can vary arbitrarily, brokerages could change margin requirements to any arbitrary amount, arbitration clauses, you
agree to indemnify the brokerage for
anything it did
even if it did the wrong thing, some brokerages also do market - making and thus have further incentive to fleece the client, and all the other «screw you» legal language that you
agreed to when opening an account.
It's hard for me to give Murdoch credit for doing
anything I
agree with, so I'll wear 2 hats
on this one: one of hope / wait - and - see, and two of expecting the blog to be nothing more than a «heat deflector», green spin, a token nod to being green while mostly working against green progress in other ways,
even within the blog.
Many answers to that question have been offered, ranging from the extreme difficulty of getting all the governments in the world to
agree on anything, to an absence of real technological solutions, to something deep in our human nature that keeps us from acting in the face of seemingly remote threats, to — more recently — the claim that we have blown it anyway and there is no point in
even trying to do much more than enjoy the scenery
on the way down.
I
agree that these numbers are not a correct measure, but
even so they tell that any effect
on the Sun or the Earth is very small, and that Saturn, in particular, is already so distant that neither its mass nor its magnetic fields can have much influence
on anything in the Sun or for the Earth.
So we can
agree they are both utterly trivial amounts and would have no effect
on anything even if they were many times larger?
When people who
agree can't
even agree on a definition of the extent and urgency of the problem, then what's the point of saying
anything to anyone?
If you and your spouse can't
agree on anything, or have
even a few issues in which a satisfactory resolution can not be reached, the adversarial process is about to begin.