Sentences with phrase «even argue against it»

Bitcoin Cash, while controversial and many may even argue against this opinion, was created as an alternative to SegWit and Lightning Network implementation in the bitcoin scalability war.

One could argue that they started out as an indie studio, but I'd even argue against that.

Ha, no ones crying, people are just stating the obvious, that COD games are just carbon copies released every year to the same dimwitted audience just to make money, there is no room to even argue against it.

Not exact matches

Even the most cynical will struggle to argue against Rythm's scientific overview in a recent white paper.

Even Krugman spent years just arguing against austerity because it was impolitic to attack his own party for timidity, ignorance, and corruption.

Or even when the Church argues against contraceptive use by Catholics, as that is effectively arguing for overpopulation.

But even if these comparisons are stacked, who would argue against the notion that we have defined discourse down?

I think my question to those of you who couple atheism with evolution and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?

I think my question to those of you who couple evil atheism with evolution, the big bang, and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?

It is the presupposition of linguistic communication and so even to argue against it is to exemplify it.

If you're on the right, you might insert «assault rifle» and use that logic to help argue against any new gun control — even in the wake of Parkland and Las Vegas (and Columbine, and Aurora, and Virginia Tech, and San Bernardino, and Sandy Hook, and Sutherland Springs, and Orlando, and on and on).

This is clear when Cobb argues against Sherburne that even the visual field would have to be organized by the dominant occasion: «Probably we must be held to see different parts of the visual field successively, perhaps one color at a time» (PS 3:28).

If you're on the left, you might insert «abortion» and use that logic to help argue against any and all restrictions and regulations — even in the wake of Kermit Gosnell and StemExpress and 926,190 abortions in 2014 (and 1,608,600 in 1990, and 1,497,670 in 1979, and on and on, up to 60 million since Roe).

Even a fourth grader arguing against the implementation of school uniforms in a persuasive essay understands this simple concept.

For what it is, we could produce millions of people who would argue that they prayed for X and got X or something even better when the odds were against such an outcome.

Even in the canons of the Council of Trent (1545 — 1563) nothing spoke against the possibility of divorce and remarriage, he argued.

Much ecotheology, process theology and creation spirituality go even further by arguing against the traditional split between inert, value - free nature and a transcendent God, and by arguing that God acts in and through the processes of nature, which are reconceived as sacred or spiritual.

But even without religious beliefs, we'd still not all agree on things like that, so here's a more practical reason to argue against religion:

After all, it was the fixed mark from which he argued even when he spoke against it.

As foreign - born Americans tend to be a Democratic - leaning group (and even foreign - born Americans oppose increasing immigration), all the partisan incentives argue against Republicans» supporting increasing immigration.

If you care to apply the proper word (believe) to how you feel about or toward your god, then we would not even be having this discussion, for why would I argue against your accurate description of what you believe?

If you care to apply the proper word (believe) to how you feel about or toward other minds and evidence, then we would not even be having this discussion, for why would I argue against your accurate description of what you believe?

It's just pathetic and not even worth arguing against.

They might argue even (against Paul) that doing such things sends people to hell, rather than seeing references to the «Kingdom of God» or «Kingdom of Heaven» as Jesus used them, as being about out lives here and now and what we might accomplish as we follow Christ (to which a «beneficial» conversation is much more fitting).

The book was so well argued that it is still widely credited, even by non-believers, for successfully rebutting this particular charge against God's existence.

Today some Christians argue that the development of contraceptives makes even the social prohibition against extramarital intercourse passé — which is to say, they are prepared to extend to women the privileges which the Old Testament freely accords to men.

The glorification of violence as a means to solve conflict is everywhere in our culture and I was that lame person that couldn't stand mixed - martial - arts battles and railed against video games and movies that depicted war or crime as an adventure, even arguing we are «a generation of virtual sociopaths.»

And yes, even the so - called «heretics» argued for the «inspiration of Scripture» against those who disagreed with them.

But I won't argue scripture with someone who doesn't even have a sensible definition of truth and keeps arguing against something with nothing.

Bryan actually argued against even a monetary fine, and — far from demanding a harsher penalty for Scopes — offered to pay the defendant's fine himself.

Indeed, I suspect that the vast majority of those connected with First Things would argue against the Bodies exhibition even if all its specimens came from middle - class Americans who had unquestionably decided to donate their bodies to science for the anatomical education of the masses.

That hardly argues against incorporating classical styles in many church settings, but instead cautions us that riding each successive wave of fashion may be neither desirable nor even possible.

If your plan for when you stand before the Father is to argue that you didn't think He expected us to tend the sick together as government of the people — that your vote was against it even though you knew brothers & sisters would suffer for it... well, good luck with that one.

Even if an uncritical relationship between the church and science does not totally ideologize Christianity, we still have history's word that the ambiguous nature of many scientific achievements argues against the church's unqualified sponsorship of them.

It's hard to argue against finding time to #EatYourCoffee, but the added perk of four grams of protein and fiber per serving makes it even more appealing.

Even though they're arguing against a hypothetical scenario they believe they have the high ground some how.

Looks are entirely subjective thing, but even so it's hard to argue against the Ferrari 330 P4 being one of the prettiest Le Mans racers of all time.

Even with the huge spread, more than 70 % of spread tickets are taking the Patriots to cover, and it's hard to ever argue going against New England.

It was tiring even watching that 90 minutes taken out of our life but Jose Mourinho would argue it was even more tiring for his players who had just played their 57th game in all competitions against Paul Clement's Swansea City (38th game of the season) who were a lot fresher and more determined to avoid the drop.

I don't even know what claim you think you're arguing against, but I don't think I disagree with anything substantive you've just said.

West Ham did have their chances against Newcastle and one could probably argue that if they had the suspended Manuel Lanzini and injured talismanic skipper Mark Noble in midfield, they would've ended up on the right side of the 3 - 2 scoreline or perhaps, won even more comfortably.

While Lionel Messi pours the goals in against teams in bankruptcy protection, when Maradona was in Serie A even the likes of Brescia, Udinese and Cremonese had world - class players in their ranks... And no - one can argue that Messi has a far more talented team around him both at club and international level, and far less competition at club level than Maradona ever had.

I have seen no data that would argue against breastfeeding, even in the presence of today's levels of environmental toxicants.»

Now a concerned parent can find in one source all of the prevailing scientific research arguing against the use of food as a reward, a chart showing every leading medical organization which has condemned the practice, generally useful statistics on childhood obesity and even some colorful quotes from experts.

Even here in whatever - city - USA, nothing a baby can or can not do makes sense except in light of the mother's body, a biological reality apparently dismissed by those that argue against any and all bedsharing and what they call cosleeping, but which likely explains why most crib - using parents at some point feel the need to bring their babies to bed with them — findings that our mother - baby sleep laboratory here at Notre Dame has helped document scientifically.

So you could argue that the current system is actually biased against Labour, and therefore PR will actually disadvantage Labour even more unless rates of voter registration are improved and compulsory voting introduced.

Some would even argue she did better than expected against Bernie Sanders here in the April 19 primary.

Frank Mauro, executive director emeritus of the Fiscal Policy Institute and a onetime secretary of the Assembly Ways and Means Committee, argued against Proposal One, writing at the time that it would have made the state budget process «even more of a mess than it has been in many recent years.»

Trump had been publicly discussing ending the agreement, so one could argue that Kerry may have broken the spirit of the law, (or you could argue that he was simply acting as a lobbyist and 100 % legally because the meeting was regarding existing policy), but even if you take the argument that he deliberately went against what Trump was proposing as a likely outcome, Kerry didn't violate the Logan act because it was still policy at the time.

I'm pretty sure even he would argue against you on that point.