Broader questions remain on school aid, however,
even as education reforms such as teacher evaluation criteria are no longer linked to funding.
Not exact matches
Still,
even as a number of other measures melted away from the budget talks, Cuomo stuck with including
education reforms,
as well
as ethics legislation, in the final budget agreement.
StudentsFirstNY held a rally in support of Governor Andrew Cuomo's
education reform agenda Wednesday
evening as the well - organized, well - funded pro-charter sector attempts to respond to criticisms of the governor from teachers unions.
Gillibrand said it includes the economy,
education, health care
reform, middle - class tax cuts, veterans» care, agriculture and,
as a member of the Foreign Relations Committee,
even oversight of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton - whose Senate seat she holds.
As a result, while debates between teachers» unions and
reform - minded Democrats have been fierce, they have also largely stayed within the bounds of Democratic convention, with even Democrats for Education Reform seeking to temper criticism of teachers» unions by embracing «reform» unionism and denouncing Republican efforts to curtail collective barga
reform - minded Democrats have been fierce, they have also largely stayed within the bounds of Democratic convention, with
even Democrats for
Education Reform seeking to temper criticism of teachers» unions by embracing «reform» unionism and denouncing Republican efforts to curtail collective barga
Reform seeking to temper criticism of teachers» unions by embracing «
reform» unionism and denouncing Republican efforts to curtail collective barga
reform» unionism and denouncing Republican efforts to curtail collective bargaining.
Though we've begun to recognize these
as major impediments to important
reforms within today's brick - and - mortar world, they turn out to be
even more constraining — and damaging — to
education in the online realm.
Even as it faces a multimillion - dollar financial crisis and scrambles to meet new federal
education requirements, the nation's second largest district is taking on a new challenge: restroom
reform.
It was not so much that his street - level tactics and confrontational style violated protest orthodoxy, but that he had the capacity to revise his thinking dramatically to suit the circumstances that he faced —
even to the extent of giving up some of the socialist principles associated with nationalist thinking to endorse market
education reforms such
as school vouchers, charter schools, and parental choice.
Bill Gates, the co-founder of the world's largest philanthropy, last week called on President - elect Barack Obama and the U.S. Congress to expand support for
education and make the federal government «a dynamic agent of school
reform,»
even as the nation struggles through grim economic times.
Other than former Florida governor Jeb Bush, who heads the Foundation for Excellence in
Education and seems
even more committed to
reform than his brother was, and Lamar Alexander, another former governor who «gets» this issue and cares deeply about it, party leaders seem uncertain
as to what needs to be done or how to go about it.
As the presidential election heats up, many Republicans will urge relentless opposition to everything,
even if it fits the
education reform agenda.
Nonetheless, the adequacy lawsuit has emerged
as a prominent, if largely unnoticed,
reform strategy, using the courts to force
even more
education spending on state and local governments.
Even as Republicans murmur about getting Uncle Sam out of K — 12
education — and thus out of the
education -
reform business — altogether, Democrats are torn between featherbedding their union pals and micromanaging the nation» s schools from thousands of miles away.
Even though accountability is increasingly recognized
as the linchpin of
education reform, only a few states have made real progress in establishing accountability systems.
Despite its origins within the Reagan administration, the National Commission on Excellence in
Education didn't
even regard market - based
reforms as sufficiently important to include them among the scores of topics on which it contracted for background research.
Their efforts to simultaneously exist
as the champions and opponents of
education reform are meeting resistance
even internally.
As Maddin explains,
even reform - minded colleges and universities focused on teacher
education have «student teaching» elements to programs, but he says, «It's rare for a student teacher to be held responsible for a kid's learning.»
The implication is that most Americans,
even those with school - age children, currently see
education reform as time and money spent on other people's children.
To the Editor: I am always intrigued by proponents of a «free market» approach to
reforming education,
as delineated in the Commentary by Karl Borden and Edward A. Rauchut («Choice: Making
Even Good Schools Better,» April 17, 1996).
When the numbers result in a Blue State: Red State ratio of 9:1, one suspects, with
even more than 90 percent confidence, that RttT is
as much or more a partisan boondoggle
as an
education reform strategy.
The solution to the crisis in the schools, the organizations argued (
even as they denied that a crisis existed), lay not in a spate of
reforms but in increased spending on
education.
And
even as the statewide Florida
Education Association vehemently opposed these
reforms, our students went on to become national leaders in making progress on NAEP (see Figure 1).
As if all of that wasn't clear enough, Bronin's donor list
even contains most of the lobbyists who represent the pro-privatization, anti-teacher and anti-public
education groups in Connecticut including the lobbyists for ConnCAN, the Northeast Charter School Network and the Connecticut Council for Educatio
education groups in Connecticut including the lobbyists for ConnCAN, the Northeast Charter School Network and the Connecticut Council for
EducationEducation Reform.
At the same time, their silence gives tacit support to arguments by traditionalists that standardized testing should not be used in evaluating teachers or for systemic
reform (
even when,
as seen this week from American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten and others critical of the state
education policy report card issued by Rhee's StudentsFirst, find it convenient to use test score data for their own purposes).
It should not come
as surprise that
even after the extraordinarily ambitious school finance
reform legislation is fully implemented, in some — and perhaps
even in many — districts the quality of a student's
education will still be dependent on where a child is born, and on the wealth of his or her parents.
Michelle Rhee has helped to set genuine
education reform back a decade or more,
even as she pushes for conservative policies that undermine public
education.
As a result of their ill - conceived policies billions of dollars in public taxpayer funds at the federal level and tens of millions of dollars here in Connecticut are being shifted away from classroom instruction so that corporate
education reform companies can continue to make
even more money.
I want to say
as a supporter of a lot of those
education reforms and
even a co-author of a lot of those bills, I think that rhetoric is disingenuous.
Invariably, what is labeled «teacher bashing» is nothing more than anger at the teachers unions for blocking every type of
education reform imaginable,
as well
as the unions doing their level best to block school districts» attempts to fire bad and
even criminal teachers.
As reported in today's CTMirror, it wasn't
even two hours after Governor Malloy signed the «
education reform» bill into law before the three groups representing the school superintendents, principals and school boards went back on their word, claiming that the new law gave them the right to implement policies that student's standardized test scores can account for 50 percent of a teachers evaluation rather than the 22.5 percent that was listed in the draft bill and agreed to by all of the parties last January.
An
even greater possibility for
reform lies in the move by the Obama administration to allow American Indian and Alaska Native tribes, which have long complained about being left out of these efforts, to participate in Race to the Top so long
as they operate schools under the purview of the federal Bureau of Indian
Education or through their tribal education department in partnership with d
Education or through their tribal
education department in partnership with d
education department in partnership with districts.
The 1983 Nation at Risk report, which marked the start of the modern era of
education reform, did not so much
as mention the dropout problem
even as it called for higher graduation requirements.
He
even goes so far
as to suggest that my opposition to the
reforms being sponsored by the corporate funded
education - industrial complex means that I «prefer the system the way it is.»
Prop. 32 has already gained backing from Romero, who
as head of the Golden State branch of centrist Democrat
reform outfit Democrats for Education Reform, has already proven to be an even more thornier foe for the NEA and AFT (along with state Democrat party leaders who are servile to the un
reform outfit Democrats for
Education Reform, has already proven to be an even more thornier foe for the NEA and AFT (along with state Democrat party leaders who are servile to the un
Reform, has already proven to be an
even more thornier foe for the NEA and AFT (along with state Democrat party leaders who are servile to the unions).
The recriminations over the excesses, perceived and otherwise, of George W. Bush's tenure
as president (
as well
as the defeat of Republican nominee John McCain by Obama seven years ago)
even extend to
education policy
as movement conservatives otherwise unconcerned with
education policy are accusing conservative
reform outfits such
as the Thomas B. Fordham Institute of being apostates.
When the 1998
reforms were passed, schools suddenly had to fit
even more required coursework, such
as health and technology
education, into the year.
Even as the party itself is divided over embracing Common Core standards, has a retrograde on
education in the form of House Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (who wants to eviscerate the strong accountability measures contained in the No Child Left Behind Act), and had a primary race for the presidential nod that had seen aspirants backtrack (of offer little information) on their respective school reform agendas, Republicans were able to paper over these issues thanks to strong calls by former Florida governor Jeb Bush, Texas teacher Sean Duffy, and onetime Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for expanding school choice, advancing Parent Power, and overhauling how teachers are recruited, trained, managed, and com
education in the form of House
Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (who wants to eviscerate the strong accountability measures contained in the No Child Left Behind Act), and had a primary race for the presidential nod that had seen aspirants backtrack (of offer little information) on their respective school reform agendas, Republicans were able to paper over these issues thanks to strong calls by former Florida governor Jeb Bush, Texas teacher Sean Duffy, and onetime Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for expanding school choice, advancing Parent Power, and overhauling how teachers are recruited, trained, managed, and com
Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (who wants to eviscerate the strong accountability measures contained in the No Child Left Behind Act), and had a primary race for the presidential nod that had seen aspirants backtrack (of offer little information) on their respective school
reform agendas, Republicans were able to paper over these issues thanks to strong calls by former Florida governor Jeb Bush, Texas teacher Sean Duffy, and onetime Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for expanding school choice, advancing Parent Power, and overhauling how teachers are recruited, trained, managed, and compensated.
Most troubling in the Today interview, though, was the President's failure to
even mention school choice — giving parents, not politicians, control of
education money —
as even a potential means for
reforming education.
Save for Andy Rotherham and Charlie Barone of Democrats for
Education Reform, centrist Democrats allowed Duncan to proclaim that
as many
as 90 percent of schools would be found academically failing under No Child —
even as data has proven his statements to be, to put it kindly, not
even close to being on - target.
And yet here we are, with a governor — aka #goalie — who enjoys
Education Minnesota's support
even as he moves forward with a number of overdue
reforms despite having precious little to give in the way of money, and with the noble laborer front and center in the popular imagination.
Reforms were on fast track Indeed in Minnesota, where a stalemate between Gov. Tim Pawlenty and the state's largest teachers union resulted in no K - 12 omnibus bill whatsoever last year, even the labor - loving DFL went into this year's legislative session vowing to fast - track such education reforms as alternative paths to teacher licensure, modifications to teacher tenure and tying teacher compensation to student perfo
Reforms were on fast track Indeed in Minnesota, where a stalemate between Gov. Tim Pawlenty and the state's largest teachers union resulted in no K - 12 omnibus bill whatsoever last year,
even the labor - loving DFL went into this year's legislative session vowing to fast - track such
education reforms as alternative paths to teacher licensure, modifications to teacher tenure and tying teacher compensation to student perfo
reforms as alternative paths to teacher licensure, modifications to teacher tenure and tying teacher compensation to student performance.
And he has stuck to this statement
even as school reformers such Charlie Barone of Democrats For
Education Reform and Andy Rotherham, and early numbers coming out of state education carpets, proved that Duncan's estimates were nothing b
Education Reform and Andy Rotherham, and early numbers coming out of state
education carpets, proved that Duncan's estimates were nothing b
education carpets, proved that Duncan's estimates were nothing but smoke.
It should come
as no surprise to the
education advocates in Utah that
even when their Republican governor calls for an end to the Common Core, there will be some top Republican leaders, along with the business community and pro-corporate
education reform groups, that would seek to undermine his position.
Even the AFT and CEA have admitted that Governor Malloy's 2012 Corporate
Education Reform Industry Initiative sought to eliminate tenure for all public school teachers in Connecticut and replace it with a system of short - term contracts in which continued employment
as a teacher would depend, in part, on the test scores teachers» students got on the unfair and inappropriate Common Core Standardized Tests.
But perhaps
even more important is Malloy's failure to publicly retract his effort to repeal collective
as part of his Corporate
Education Reform Industry proposal in 2012 (Senate Bill 24).
Watch the bouncing ball...
as the Corporate
Education Reform Industry, Families for Excellent Schools, the Coalition for Every Child, Governor Malloy's former press secretary Andrew Doba, Achievement First Inc. and the other charter school lobby groups try to divert
even more public funds away from Connecticut's public schools and into the coffers of charter school companies...
In addition to «The Big Six,» other organizations that are presently lobbying Connecticut legislators in favor of the charter school and «
education reform» agenda include the Bronx Charter School for Excellence, the North East Charter Schools Network, Achievement First, Inc., the large charter school chain with schools in New York, Connecticut and Rhode Island, and Families for Excellent Schools, the New York - based lobbing and political entity that bused in charter school students and parents from
as far away
as New York City and Boston last year to rally in support of Malloy's efforts to hand charter schools
even more public funds.
Even after the proposal was modified by the Connecticut General Assembly is still held out
as a prime example of the corporate
education reform industry's obsession with more standardized testing and inappropriate teacher evaluation programs that utilize standardized test results.
As I noted yesterday, this will leave the state's
education system still in need of
reform, but thankfully spared from
even further capture by the unions.
If Duncan, with his drive and strong connection to the president, can't do it
even as the broader forces of
education reform promote similar fixes, neither could someone with different prescriptions.