The 2002 - 2003 lows never actually reached
even average valuations, much less historical medians, but we did observe enough value based on normalized fundamentals and improved market action to remove most of our hedges in early 2003.
Not exact matches
«Nowadays,» say the two experts, «
valuations are much more sober: the
average NASDAQ - listed company today trades at around 21x PE, and
even high - flying companies such as Apple, the most valuable company ever, trades at only 15x PE.»
When
valuations exceeded
even 12 times normalized earnings (on our most comprehensive measure discussed above), seemingly «favorable» market action was followed by profound losses
averaging -69.8 % on an annualized basis (generally reflecting a few weeks of vertical losses until enough damage was done to kick the market action measures negative).
In the 33 years since the 1982 low,
valuations have quadrupled, and the S&P 500 has enjoyed an
average price increase of 9.5 % annually,
even though nonfinancial gross value added has increased by only 5 % annually.
This does not, for
even a moment, change the fact that the most reliable measures of
valuation are now an
average of 3.0 times their historical norms.
Even with some recent pullbacks, the P / E ratio of big U.S. companies, and the
valuation of the market itself, are far above the international
average.
The company's cash flow is a better metric to use for profit and
valuation, and investors are paying much less for cash flow now (
even though it's very likely to rise considerably in the near term) than they've been paying, on
average, for the last three years.
Even technical analysis supports the extent of the washout in
valuations: Just 25 % of the Nikkei 225 Index constituents are above their 50 - day moving
averages, which is typically a level that precedes mean reversion and retracement trades.
One can relate this directly to a 10 - year prospective return by recalling that historical tendency for market cycles to establish normal prospective returns — if
even briefly as in 2009 — at their troughs (and it's typical for troughs to reach below
average valuations and much higher prospective returns than the 10 % historical norm).
This instance may be different in the near term, but a century of evidence argues that the completion of the market cycle will wipe out the majority of the gains observed in the advancing portion to - date (
even without
valuations similar to the present, the
average, run - of - the - mill bear market decline has erased more than half of the market gains from the preceding bull market advance).
And
even if we knew what
average valuations will be in the future, our estimate would still contain substantial uncertainty, because
valuation is highly cyclical.
The rout that erased $ 2.9 trillion from U.S. equities has pushed
valuations in the Standard & Poor's 500 Index 25 percent below the
average level from the last nine recessions,
even as profit estimates fall.
For me, it's hard to get excited about stocks at these
valuations when I can add to my rental portfolio and earn 15 - 20 % cash on cash returns quite easily before accounting for any appreciation and loan paydown... of course you have the headaches of managing tenants and maintenance issues, but
even if you pay a 10 % management fee, the numbers are still a lot better than
average stock returns.
Given the high stock
valuation the company will have to outperform to provide
even average stock returns in the long run.
«
Even the rather crude assumption that past
average earnings will be repeated in the future may be found a more reliable basis of
valuation than some other figure plucked out of the air of either optimism or pessimism.»
Starting at today's
valuations, it takes about 20 years before a stock market investor can be reasonably confident (80 % +) of achieving a gain (after inflation)
even though he uses dollar cost
averaging.
«
Even with small caps lagging, the
valuations in our view are still well above long - term
averages,» says Kate Warne, investment strategist at Edward Jones in St. Louis.
The company's cash flow is a better metric to use for profit and
valuation, and investors are paying much less for cash flow now (
even though it's very likely to rise considerably in the near term) than they've been paying, on
average, for the last three years.
From 1962 to 2015, the «true»
average excess return — which excludes the impact of
valuations on the returns of stocks and adjusts for the return impact of interest rate movements on bonds — fell from 2.8 % to 0.8 % on a rolling 15 - year basis.10 The corresponding 15 - year win rate was halved from 82 % to 43 %, odds not
even as good as a coin toss!
Even applying a reasonably generous
valuation on the business, to reflect the assumption that ICON will bounce back to its LT
average margin, it's obvious that the market has opted for a rosier scenario...
On
average, a high quality fixed income manager might attract a 0.67 % -1.0 % of AUM
valuation, while an alternative asset manager might command 7.5 % -10 % of AUM (or
even higher).
On
average, a high quality fixed income manager might attract a 0.67 % -1.0 % of AUM
valuation, while a top - class alternative asset manager could command anything from 7.5 % -10 % of AUM, or
even higher.
Valuations have come down somewhat with the losses of recent weeks, but
even given the volatility, equities are still relatively highly valued compared with historic
averages.»
Alas, the obvious challenge for all of us is: i) how to (reliably) find those long - term high - quality / high - growth companies, and ii) then overcome your natural aversion to a
valuation that's a large premium or
even a multiple of the market
average...
I'm also not asking you to estimate what current market
valuations might actually be, or the
average valuations readers might submit, or
even these companies» enterprise / take - out
valuations.
Zoopraisal's attempt to replicate a
valuation procedure via remote means renders a remote
valuation,
even if it is only an estimate of area
averages.
Even more impactful, the
average home
valuation was 3.38 percent higher than the same time last year.