Sentences with phrase «even better starting point»

Perhaps an even better starting point before over-representing any climate crisis and spending many billions of dollars more to solve it will be to decide which of two opposite «factual presentations» deemed to be most dangerous should be exaggerated.

Not exact matches

Even if hindsight bias allows us to point out all the cases where it has turned out to be a mistake — a mistake that sometimes delayed paradigm shifts in science for years or decades — it's still usually best to start by attempting to explain anomalous observations within the theoretical framework we have.

And don't even get them started on natural disasters, the religious watch some people far away in pain and suffering their first response is to point a finger at any well groomed stylish men they can find and ask «Hmmmm?

Apparently $ 15 won't even be good enough and is just the starting point.

The baking blend is a good starting point for using Stevia because you can barely even tell the different.

I know I read at one point that quinoa farmers had been selling at a loss for a long time, and that relatively recently things were starting to shift for the better - but it's hard to know what the reality is on the farms, or what information is even accurate.

Arsenal fans will obviously hoping that this is where the coincidence ends as well, because the Gunners got off to the worst possible start last year by losing at home to Liverpool (and when you consider they pipped us to the final Champions League spot by a single point that loss looks even worse).

Chambers started at CB (which is his natural position), played well, and then Wenger tried his best to completely destroy the poor kid, whilst at the same time losing us points, by shoving him out at RB, and keeping him there even though he was getting destroyed by almost every winger.

Even watching tapes of Chelsea and man city would be a good starting point.

why was Sanchez truly playing... no one believes he was too injured to play to start the season, and some like myself would go as far to suggest he wasn't injured at all... so why play him... they can't say it was to appease the fans because when was that ever a factor at this club except when «panic buys» were in the offing... I believe that this was to give Arsenal a little leverage when it comes to negotiating his transfer... just imagine their horrible bargaining position if Sanchez never saw the field before the deadline then heading back to South America and played for Chile... regardless of the facts, this was sadly again another example of a team putting business ahead of fielding a team with the greatest chance to secure 3 points... of course, some will say that Sanchez is, or was, our best player, so obviously he's a no - brainer to start, but those who really watch the game know that his heart hasn't been truly in it for quite some time... even at the end of last season you could see a definitive difference between the Sanchez who played for Chile and the one that played for Arsenal... that being said, 70 % of Sanchez is still better than a 100 % of the vast majority of our remaining roster... shame on you Arsene and shame on you too Sanchez for that telling smirk... I've supported your attempt to push this squad to the next level but don't pretend for a second that you didn't know you were being watched... don't lower your standards or you'll end up like this club, on the outside looking in

So today people are confessing that Szczesny is better than Ospina.It was funny how it was made to look Szczesny was the cause of Arsenal's goals because of his mistakes.People also forget the kind of defence he's had in front of him from the time he started till he went on loan.I can't believe anyone watches Ospina and Szczesny in terms of goal keeping ability and says Ospina is better.When Ospina first came he was also making the same mistakes Szczesny made but some ignored it insisting he was better.I'd like to see Ospina go to AS Roma and do better than Szczesny.Even Juventus are in for him even if their bid is derisory.Some also said the fact that Ospina had a cool head over Szczesny meant he should start over him.If you've watched Ospina and Szczesny well from a neutral point and not being bias you'll clearly know who's better.If I was Szczesny I won't return because I'm in my prime.

Even when Sanogo doesn't score he is better, we start defending from up top when he is on and attack is more fluid; I know ppl will point to d palace game but they sat very deep not affording him any space and Giroud wasn't exactly better when he came on.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Giroud will never lead us to the title he's not good enough and don't start with injuries Aguero was out for 6weeks and City had to play Milner as a striker but he still has 21 league goals because he's World Class, the truth is we are 13 points behind Chelsea even with his 14 GOALS GALORE we're not even close!

even as a pundit he never really makes good points I would be more happy about arteta and DB10 or someone like Koeman, but either way arteta or Henry should first start in a team in the dutch league to learn the necessary experience

and wenger is being a t ## t now you can not start the transfer window with sanchez and end it with a f» ing wellbeck i will be dissapointed if we get that desperate only big name striker now would be cavani but no point even saying it, we all know he thinks he has brought enough typical frustations for us gooners why can we challenge the big teams for the big players suarez to barca, I would of been happyt with balo liverpool, costa chelsea, if they do falcao united wich is a complete joke if he is happy going to united he would have been happier coming here with ucl and all, lewandowski bayern, its all a joke we better get a reus or something of equal measure you cant buy sanchez and place him as a striker when you need him as a winger if defeats the purpose we either get another winger or a striker.

Preseason No. 1 Georgia has been good but not great during a 4 — 0 start, and even after a 17 - point win at Arizona State, questions remain about the Bulldogs as they enter a brutal stretch in the SEC

«Memphis, as always, needed well over two minutes to score it's first points, and were down 6 - 0 seemingly before the game even started,» wrote Keith G. Edwards Jr. of Grizzly Bear Blues.

«But the good point is that even if it went worse that it was, at least we kind of see more, start to understand the things more.

I would expect to see Sanchez at some point, even the last half hour to give him game time, however I would stick with Welbeck to start over Sanchez (never thought I would say that) If Jack or Reece have good games I would stick them on the bench.

My overall point, is that even if Wenger had the best starting XI in the world, and unlimited funds, he would still struggle, because of not having the correct tactics, and not instilling a winning mentality.

With Arsenal desperately needing some kind of confidence boost as well as all three Premier League points from this evening's away game at Middlesborough, Arsene Wenger will have been very relieved to welcome our best centre back Laurent Koscielny and the first choice keeper Petr Cech back into training this week, and it is no surprise that both are in the starting line - up tonight.

that's it — we couldn't emulate the Invincibles last season and we had Ospina (who is not Chech but neither was it his fault for any of our dropped points)... Having said that i still think there's a lot of positives for this season: > After FA cup win — we have gained a better winning mentality > This season we starting with Le Coq and Chech > Players are in good form and we don't have injuries (aside from Welbeck, who even if fit wont easily get a starting place)

Also the extremely erratic Man United are only 4 points behind us as well putting us under even more pressure to start racking up some more points.

Despite their good start, the Swans are big dogs just to earn a point in this one and we'll likely see this line move up even higher from Chelsea -332.

Despite Dybala's inconsistent season, Juve still depends on him as a focal point to their offense — even if he's used as a decoy — as you don't just become a better team by subtracting 16 goals and six assists in the starting lineup.

Seven points in a week is a fine haul after our indifferent start to the season, and if we can defeat an out of form Newcastle team this weekend then the table will look even better, and hopefully we can then begin to look upwards as opposed to downwards.

JLH has made some really good points about how important it is not to just do things for kids because it's easier, though there are many, many books that talk about developmentally when you start turning over responsibility to kids even though it takes them longer.

Even if it has the best pregnancy odds, it may not be the best starting point for you.

And when you get to this point you also need to start thinking about pumping (well, you should start thinking about it long before giving birth) as it is the only way to ensure that your baby gets breast milk even in your absence.

Angry words, loud shouting, constant criticism of parents or child — all of these are signals that trouble a toddler to the point that she may regress and start wetting during the day, even though she now knows full well how to go potty.

Once school started, things were a little better, but the kids were still driving to me to the point of exasperation before they even got on the bus.

Your child isn't ready for the finer points of well - mannered dining (such as which fork to use for the cake), but he's old enough to start learning and even perform the basics — depending, of course, on whether he's just turned 2 or is approaching kindergarten age.

Your friend Tristram Hunt of course is guilty of the same Neo-Liberal agenda, he supported free schools right up to the point where they started to fail in Sweden, then rapidly reversed to just supporting the Academies which the teaching profession reject and only work with it from imposition, even that now has turned into mass protest forcing the numskull Tories to publicly retreat, although they will secretly use the inspectors to rig the system, where good schools are deemed poor by their diktat.

Even managing to take brisk walks during your break or in the hallway for 15 minutes, every two to three hours would be a good starting point.

That makes a really good starting point in like, you know, I was maybe down for the count for day and a half to two days but I was still able to work 10 hour a day, see patients, do my thing at home, cook, do all my stuff and I was still able to function even though I was starting to feel it because I hit it hard.

Even if you do it once for three to five minutes a day, it's a good starting point to put you in parasympathetics.

Hello, overall a fairly decent article full of good starting point information, however one claim that I was particularly concerned with was the following statement: «For example, sitting can't permanently or even temporarily «shorten» your hip flexors because muscles can't change in length — they can simply become bigger or smaller.»

I also spent the better part of my life as a total sugar addict without realizing it, and while I truly missed sweets and cakes so much at the start, I don't even think much about them at all at this point.

At this point, you need to start dating and maybe you'll even meet someone who's a better match for you.

Depending on your circumstances, it may be tempting to just get back out there — but getting into dating and a relationship from a position of fear, loneliness or even just plain old curiosity is not the best starting point for a healthy, happy and mature relationship.

But even though «Edge of the City» starts decently enough, and makes its point well in the end, the dramatic tension does fall off somewhat in the second act.

If you're interested in the subject matter but aren't really sure where to begin, The Fifth Estate an interesting starting point to whet your appetite, but those who already know the full and accurate story will likely be bored, while those who are wholly unfamiliar or uninterested will likely not find it good enough as a movie, or even a basic story, to want to sit through for over two hours.

Today marks the hump day of Movie Club, that point when, if all goes well, we may start to veer off the trail a bit, not just debating the high - profile, prestigious, or commercially successful movies of the year but giving our own individualized props to the misfits, the weirdos, the flops, even the dogs.

Thanking a former teacher for great math lessons is an excellent start, but it's even better if a student can point out the extra strain of getting students to focus during the very last hour of the school day.

Even though there are many ways to define character education, for the moment let's assume that Wikipedia provides a reasonable starting point: ``... an umbrella term loosely used to describe the teaching of children in a manner that will help them develop variously as moral, civic, good, mannered, behaved, non-bullying, healthy, critical, successful, traditional, compliant or socially acceptable beings.»

The best probable explanation I can come up with is that the «false start» you described caused a drop or spike in voltage (or even removed voltage from the supply line, depending on what you did with the ignition key) right at the point that the airbag controller was powering up and performing its self - diagnostic.

But despite its longevity and utility, the 70 Series has never come cheap and the upgraded range is even pricier, with prices now starting well into the $ 60,000 bracket — a price point hitherto reserved for top - end premium versions of popular mid-size «lifestyle» dual - cabs.

You both seem to know some of the details of each other's finances and I think an initial, high level discussion is a good starting point — even if the end result is that you guys both agree that you don't really know how you should handle things financially.

No one will add money to a losing fund, even if that is the point where it might start to do better.