Sentences with phrase «even better value for your money»

But now our clients get even better value for their money, since both Mobile Browser Version and iPhone / iPad Application have a joint price of $ 200.

Given its equipment level, appealing design and comfort level, the MKZ appears to offer buyers decent value for their money — though buyers willing to look at aggressively priced competitors such as the Hyundai Genesis or Kia Cadenza may find even better value for their money elsewhere.

And maybe even better value for money, the 9 - inch (1920 × 1280) NOOK HD + has seen its price cut from $ 269 to only $ 149.

Only by being attentive to the needs of both pets and their owners, while constantly innovating to provide even better value for money, can the manufacturer continue to satisfy both «customers» - pets and pet owners.

The answer came in the form of the ZenFone line of budget, and mid-range devices like the ZenFone 5 from last year and now, the ZenFone 2 line of devices offer even better value for money with an option for 4 GB of RAM available.

If you think that Xiaomi's Mi 5X was even better value for money than the Redmi Note 4 than we've got great news.

Not exact matches

But anecdotal evidence, at least, suggests that directors often doubt the reliability and value of comp consultants, even after having paid good money for their advice.

Because it operates in the hard - hit auto industry area, Redmer explains that it's even more important that their customers receive a good value for their money.

To name a few additional struggles: we have to compete with the richest league in the world where every team has money and isn't begging for transfers of their best players to fund themselves (8/20 of the highest valued teams), we have a poor injury record that is being addressed, we have far fewer homegrown talents in our league, the overall league quality is higher even if the highest teams are not of the quality of other top teams, selling of our best players during the past decade has lead to a lack of momentum and yes, there has been times where our manager got it wrong.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

Lacazette is one of our few options out there so I will be happy if this happens If I were Wenger I would also get Mahrez Lacazette and Mahrez would be # 70 - 80 million well spent and better value for money than # 80 mil for Higuain Both are 25 years old with time to get even better, Mahrez has PL experience.

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I'd say, in such a scenario, buying a 60 - 70m player is probably better value for money, because even with the TV money, there will be less clubs able to buy at that value, hence inflation will not be as high.

Good value for money - I can sew, but each product includes almost a full yard of fabric for each layer - which means that I can't even purchase the materials for the price that Lil Helper charges for their mattress pads.

70 % of parents say a Degree Apprenticeship is better value for money, and two thirds of parents would still prefer their child took this route even if money were no object.

While Fox is said to be seeking a full Trident replacement, chancellor George Osborne and even David Cameron are said to be questioning whether this would offer good value for money.

Sure, there are even more expensive drones, but this one offers the very best features, long - term value, and design for the money.

I'm unconvinced # 20 is good value for money for a speed dating event, when it doesn't even include a welcome drink, and at least with events like Shhh Dating, the night included an element of (albeit unwitting) entertainment.

This has meant that even as government support has reduced, solar PV systems can still offer good value for money, particularly as energy bills are on the rise again.

The ESA model also encourages parents to obtain the best value for their child's education dollars, as unspent money in one year can be rolled over to the next and even be spent on college costs.

The prospect of the DOE «selling» the loan to an investor group is reportedly unprecedented, but even at the much lower price than its original value, represents the best chance for U.S. taxpayers to get at least part of their money back.

I'm sure it will be an excellent car that will blow the others out of the water as a value for money, do eveything well kinda car, but for me I'd rather have something a little different even if it does have a few drawbacks in comparison to the GTI.

The Titan XD is already a lot of truck for the money with the optional diesel engine, and that value proposition gets even better with the standard gas engine.

So, Alto K10 is the best value for money car in its segment while the convenience of automatic gearbox makes the car even more desirable.

«I think we've got a good opportunity to maintain, or even exceed that kind of volume based on the price point it's at, and I think we're still the best value for money car in the segment.

Even though the Zest is being advertised as fun to drive and a powerful vehicle, Tata wants to cater to buyers looking for a value for money proposition as well.

The Focus is known for its well - balanced chassis and good dynamics, but what matters more for regular customers is that it offers good value for money, frugal engines (there's even a 1.0 - liter 3 - cylinder turbo) as well as generous space and practicality.

That makes its already good value proposition even better for those looking for a ride on a tight budget: when you buy a Mirage, you save money on the price tag and on gas in the years to come.

Without options, even the highest spec Touring Sport still manages to come in under the $ 50,000 mark which makes it pretty good value for money, it's one of those cars that you're never really going top wrong with.

Even as the base spec model, the LX comes well equipped with cruise control, and Bluetooth connectivity, but it's the EX model that offers the best value for money with features such as an 8 - speaker audio system.

Even when I had to read the comics on my laptop, I thought the Marvel Unlimited service was good value for the money.

HP is pretty confident that even though Slate will be joining the party late, a full 2 months after the launch of iPad and allowing iPad to build on the initial lead, the Slate will be superior in design and features providing a better value for money product to buyers than the iPad.

In fact, it's excellent value for money for what is one of the best mobile email services and mobile keyboards available, and we suspect upgraders could get an even better deal.

One could argue that trying to charge a little extra and make more profit is more trouble than it's worth for Google or Apple (or even profit - hungry Amazon)-- better to offer it at cost or thereabouts to enhance the value of the broader platform, which is where the real money comes from (advertising and devices respectively).

Despite the fact that its newest Android - based tablets were already crazily good value for money, you can now pick them up even cheaper.

Since there is a time value to money, in that scenario the mortgage loan without points would represent a better deal for you, even though the APRs are identical.

Cost / Value for Money: 8/10 (15 kg costs # 38 but feed amounts are quite low and need to be when you have a 50 kg dog) Quality of ingredients: 7/10 (I am sure others can comment better than me but The Meat content seems good and is defined and the main cereal is rice, also the oils are chicken / fish) Packaging / Marketing: 5/10 (Difficult one as packaging is very basic which keeps the costs down, but marketing could be better as few have even heard of it and it is by franchised delivery only) Apparent Taste Factor: 7/10 (Seems to be well accepted and eaten happily but has no sugar / Salt so possibly would score lower than some other dry foods) Back End Tolerance: 8/10

A new Standard Wing at the resort offers even better value for guests, meaning more spending money for a holiday to remember.

Even better, the Executive Club offers you the option to stretch the value of your miles further with multiple Avios + Money redemption options for any itinerary.

Nobody is forcing you to read it, and he even says «so it is entirely up to you to judge if this would represent good value for money for you.»

Also, who doesn't love the indie darlings which have made the console home, made even better by initiatives such as cross-buy, cross-save and cross-play, which allow great value for money across the entire PlayStation ecosystem and the chance to expand your library at a fraction of the cost.

It's also good value for money, although it's still rather bizarre that 7 characters were settled on as opposed to 6 or even 9, but, with how replayable the game is, it's hardly a huge complaint.

I think people view them as good value for money, even if the content is usually not very original or interesting.

Maybe Kangaroo court is its more appropriate name, because it is clear to even me that the whole process is just being casually strung along so that those being paid to harass and frustrate my situation give good value for money.

Even so, it is still most appropriate to look at this like any other purchase and to try to do what you can to get the best value for the money you spend.

4K and HDR capable (the latter not even something Sky Q can deliver right now), as well as supporting other cool features such as Dolby Atmos, the Virgin V6 does offer comparative value for money and, thanks to a massive selection of content to choose from, a great platform from which to enjoy your favorite shows, films and events.

At Rs 8,999, the Redmi 3S Prime takes its place among the best value for money propositions in the sub-Rs 10,000 market, and even comes within breathing space of the 2 GB RAM / 16 GB version of the its own Redmi Note 3, which packs in a much better display and processor, as well as a camera with a higher megapixel count (16).

Even in its current state, the Play is really good value for money.

Mmx unite 2 and colors 2 and asus zenfone are even better than this upgraded handset for low price and value for money