Sentences with phrase «even bigger bang»

Many wonder if it will further erode e-Book pricing with consumers wanting an even bigger bang for the buck.

If you're looking for the ripped, deep cut look to show off your body in perfect form, take a look at the «Cutting Stack», where all the above steroids are grouped together to give you better value and and even bigger bang for your buck!

As for numerologists, scientists, and non-believers in general... to explain anything within our universe completely and fully (even the big bang theory or evolution), one must eventually take a leap of faith and believe in something that equations or definitions can't quantify.

You aware that even the big bang wound up needing «God» to run it, so life as we know it could come into being?

«Theoretically a consequence of violent cosmic events — the collisions of black holes, the explosive deaths of stars, or even the big bang — gravitational waves could provide a brand new lens for studying the universe,» writes Science magazine.

That's it; it doesn't say any gobbledegook about equipartitions of energy or gravity, or Einstein's theory of relativity; either special or general, or QED, or Maxwell's equations, or even the big bang.

Not exact matches

Used by themselves or in combination, the strategies noted below can offer a small or solo business owner big bang for few, or even no, bucks.

Now, I can dig deeper and deeper using god, in some sort of fashion, or even in a very minimalistic manner, meaning, god only intervened by causing the big bang, the rest, we have figured out.

Most atheists would say that we simply don't have enough data to know what caused the big bang if the big bang is even the true cause of the universe.

All the matter that is here now was here before the big bang, even if it was in a different form.

Even though the universe may have started with a «big - bang» the simple fact is that nothing in this physical universe can account for its own existence.

you try and prove genesis fits perfectly with evolution and the big bang even with all the glaring contradictions and falsehoods that genesis presents just so you can make sure the bible still sounds truthful?

Even scientists are finding that — trying to explain the existance of life going back to the «big bang» that the dust had to come from somewhere!

I think my question to those of you who couple evil atheism with evolution, the big bang, and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?

Or i could point out that the big bang is the biggest joke ever told... That even the top physicists can't figure out how their own theory could work, not to mention the fact that for it to work they would need for the Universe to break the fundamental laws we understand as true since the beginning i.e. (No matter in the Universe can be created nor destroyed, you can only change it's state (solid to liquid, liquid to gas etc.).

Unfortunately for the religious, there was no time prior to the big bang, so a god was not necessary or even possible.

If you read even briefly the concept of Hinduism or Sikhism, you will be astonished how close their descriptions are to what scientists are finding — something like a big bang is actually described in Vedas!

Heck, matter didn't even start dominating until 60,000 — 70,000 years after the big bang.

Even if it happened exactly how the big bang theory says that does not really show that there is no god or that there is a god.

Eric G, it is obvious that you didn't even attempt to explore the facts at NASA regarding the Big Bang information on creation; the questions of what powered the big baBig Bang information on creation; the questions of what powered the big babig bang.

Remarkable and significant as is the emergence of self - conscious persons by natural processes from the original «hot big bang» from which the universe has expanded over the last 10 - 20 thousand million years, this must not be allowed to obscure another fact about humanity, namely its relatively recent arrival in the universe, even on a time - scale of the history of the Earth.

Space, and even time itself, were created in the big bang.

Even as a Kid I always thought «fine, the big bang theory crated the universe, but it does not explain what caused the BBT itself, or what caused the agent that in turn caused the BBT» I am so glad this being discussed.

While the old testament and the bible (as in the new testament) refer to the creation of the heavens and earth (as well as the Quran for Muslims), I find it humbling that the Quran went even further to attest to the WAY this creation took place (in other words the Big bang theory is a testament to this verse).

Inside academia a religion has grown up aroung the big bang and evolution as a means to species, even though these notional hypothesis are false as science.

Even look at the big bang theory accepted by most scientist today.

Even if the big bang happens over and over, the point of the bang had to come from somewhere.

Those are his attempt to explain how the big bang could even start from singularity.

Only recently have we even had the tools to test our guesses (like the big bang), so I imagine our understanding of the world, it's history, our origins, and evolution will radically improve over the next century.

I do not see anyone other than you even talk about big bang theory and now you accuse someone else of not knowing it from evolution.

A few scientists have even gone so far as to argue that the initial conditions and fundamental constants established at the time of the big bang were fine tuned in such a way because our own species would inevitably be forthcoming.

We are fairly certain that this universe was created by the big bang but even that is uncertain.

Therefore, the big bang, evolution and all that other science stuff, even if it didn't have the tons of evidence supporting it that it has, is far more likely then «God dun it.»

haha, remember... A hundred years ago we didn't even know there was a big bang.

Even Sheldon on the funny TV show THE BIG BANG THEORY is an exaggeration, just as the other more pathetic and less self - sufficient characters are fairly realistic.

Please list this «great deal of evidence» — I'd like to examine it, especially since we know of nothing at all «pre big bang» or whether there is a «pre» or whether the statement even makes sense.

Even an explanation of the actual «big bang theory» (not just popular understanding), something truly existing out of nothing (rather than just not knowing yet where it came from), is absolutely awe inspiring.

When the molecules reach these speeds, and randmly colide, you get «the big bang» which really does nt even have to be that big, it only has to be enough to make «molecules» begin to move through time.

That kind of circular argument even goes back to explanations of the origin of the universe — according to the big bang theory (which I don't really have a problem with in the «big picture»).

Just because science hasn't explained the genesis of life, or the phenomenon of human consciousness, or even how the big bang banged — it doesn't mean that it will never do so in the future.

It doesn't even require a modification of big bang theory.

The big bang was a singular point where all matter in the universe and even time itself was created.

Solve for us the question of the reasonableness of athiesm, where you get something (big bang) from nothing — there must be a first cause of everything; explain implications of the anthropic principle and the wildly unprobablistic likelihood that our universe could even form in such a fashion as to be capable of sustaining life (which has, interestingly, your athiest heavy hitters (i.e. Dawkins, Schwartz, etc.) necessarily positing multiple universe theories to get around the near probablistic impossibility of all conditions be present at time of big bang for life to be possible without acknowledgement of a divine designing hand guiding the process); explain The probablistic impossibility of non-irreducibly complex basic cells (life) coming together spontaneously (DNA, cell membrane, etc), even the most basic, simple forms of life allowing for reproduction, metabolism, etc...

Even Hawking says there is no such thing as a god and is not necessary to create this universe we live in... since time and space were created with the big bang... logic dictates that before that there was no time or space where any god could create this universe.

When cornered on the big bang they have no answer though hundreds of billions have been spent, insane amounts of computing power and time, no expense spared after ALL these decades, the best they have is that the laws of physics must have broken down and even THEN they cant compute it and STILL... they do nt even consider the factor of «God»

Even a prominent atheistic believe it or not (I believe it was Frncis Crick, but can not recall for certain; but the statment was made nonetheless) looking at the evidence for the big bang concluded that aliens must have seeded the planet!

Investigate the evidence yourself, there is nothing at all that truly suggests that the Big Bang happened, the only thing they have used in order to come up with the theory is that in their observances, the Universe appears to be expanding from a central point, it doesn't prove that a Big bang occurred, we know so little about the universe, that we don't even know everything about our own world, and you really believe that our science has figured out the riddle to the beginning of the Universe?

You try and show that faith in the big bang is equal to or greater than faith in god... not true, not even remotely.

You only hope to end up in that position every once in a while, so you want to get the biggest bang for your buck possible, even if it means the guy might be a bust, because you can settle for just good later on.

Some Arsenal fans have not been happy with the club for keeping Arsene Wenger as our manager for some time now and even though the pressure may have been taken off the Frenchman by the team ending the long trophy drought and then backing it up with back to back FA cup wins at Wembley, the failure so far this season to take advantage of the struggles of the Premier League big boys has brought it all back with a bang.