Sentences with phrase «even by analogy»

If an individual is in favor of network neutrality and also wary of overzealous government wiretapping, he or she must be careful to not allow advocacy of federal power in one arena (enforcing network neutrality) to bleed over, even by analogy, to advocay of federal power in the other arena (surveillance).

The appeal is by «notice in writing of the appeal, setting out the grounds of the appeal» (Family Proceedings Rules 1991 r 8.2 A (2)(a)-RRB-, the rule does not quite say that this is under the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 Pt 52 procedure (even by analogy, and using Pt 52 forms, which are very easy to use: one minus from the case stated procedure which did proceed under Pt 52).

The Court of Appeal overturned his order holding that Part 36 consequences can not be applied, even by analogy, to offers falling outside Part 36.

Tzedakis et al. (2012); meanwhile Rohling et al. (2010) argued that even by analogy with the long past cycle (stage 11) we should be heading already into a glacial period.

I'm really at my best when I am at 3 pages or less in final content (about 1500 words) and I try to stick to one subject — even by analogy.

Not exact matches

Even though the scripture uses some aspects of ancient mil life to help us understand spiritual truths, the mil life and church life are not a perfect analogy or paradigm by which to judge the other.

To explain its relationship to resurrection, John Wesley draws an analogy with human experiences of joy and laughter, stating «the joy of the soul, even in this life, has some influence upon the countenance, by rendering it more open and cheerful.»

Therefore, I felt that my philosophy and theology should not be permitted to separate, but that within their unity it should be possible to affirm the awe - inspiring otherness of God even more uncompromisingly than Barth had done, since he returned to reasoning by analogy.

@KatMat: your analogy would begin approaching realism if: — during the pledge of allegiance kids were forced to say «one nation under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving taught beside Evolution in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belongs

«The institutions of men are, by analogy, the sacramentalisation of society in the natural relations of men one to another, and thus even the civic institutions of men, to be totally focused, must embody something of this underlying relationship to God as the source of human truth and the dynamism of natural human happiness.»

The affirmation that God has goodness, wisdom, mercy, justice, and even being can only be true by analogy, which combines likeness and unlikeness.

Accordingly, one may hold that, even though God is the secondary analogue with respect to how an analogy means, God is nevertheless the primary analogue with respect to what is meant by the analogy.

By analogy, we may look at the surface of the ocean on a calm day and see waves, and even, if we so choose, assess their amplitude and frequency.

But the fact that the general line of analogy is valid and fruitful seems to me to be definitely proved by the very remarkable fact that these three systems, taken in conjunction, not only form a complementary and coherent whole, consistent within itself, but, which is even more easy of demonstration, that this whole is capable of breaking into motion and of working — that it functions, in a word.

«almost as if we lived in the Middle Ages»... when the Vatican sanctioned and even encouraged Christians to go forth and slaughter Muslims by the thousand to «retake the holy land»... yea, great analogy bro.

Together with the principle that in God's revelation no word is without significance this conception of scripture leads to an atomistic exegesis, which interprets sentences, clauses, phrases, and even single words, independently of the context of the historical occasion, as divine oracles; combines them with other similarly detached utterances; and makes large use of analogy of expressions, often by purely verbal association.

Even where parallels exist, therefore, arguing by analogy encourages us to overlook what is relevant in favour of what has been elevated by popular history.

At one point, Young even used an analogy that he been deployed by a Cuomo budget spokesman about an uncle financing a mortgage.

«As the independence of members of the House of Commons has decreased under the system of party discipline — it is known as «whipping» by analogy with the fox hunting practice of whipping pack of hounds into order for the pursuit — so both the quality and reputation of MPs has declined, rendering them even less likely to behave independently.

To Cage's newspaper analogy: there is no suggestion that value of the broadsheet is mitigated by the transience of a headline, just as the banality and interchange - ability of Rauschenberg's image / objects don't undermine, but perhaps even heighten, their identity as aspects of material culture.

So for you to be supplying material so readily turned absurd by even so grave a commentator as myself merely reinforces how absurdly wrong your analogies are.

But what with evidence somewhat lacking on positive CO2 feed backs, the present temperature plateau continuing, model projections of warming way out with observation, the analogy appears a bit, well, Ehrlichean, seems to me.And then there's the bleeding of economies by costs of CO2 reduction measures and subsidizing ineffectual, (evidence indicates even un-environmental) renewable energy policies, no gain for lotsa» pain.

«The use of analogy by an opponent in a debate is the first sign that you are dealing with a twit — even more so when the debate is of a scientific or technical nature.

It's even weirder for the fact that Gristmill's last weird analogy, by Romm's fellow scientist and Green oracle Andrew Dessler, likened the planet to a sick child in need of expert medical advice.

However, the point of this posting is to convince those WUWT readers, who, like Einstein, need a physical analogy before they will accept any mathematical abstraction, that the atmospheric «greenhouse» effect is indeed real, even though estimates of climate sensitivity to doubling of CO2 are most likely way over-estimated by the official climate Team.

What I showed by the analogy is that even if the spike was rock solid mathematically, it does not show there is anything unusual about the 20th century.

This thread is a Godwin - a-polooza (a quick perusal returns analogies to McCarthy — the most favored — and we are told was a «lightweight» in comparison), Goebbels, Sandinistas, Naz * s, terrorism, Stalinism, Russian and Chinese communists, Lysenkoism, etc., full of pearl - clutching, drama - queening, and hand - wringing from fainting couches about events that apparently not one can even describe in any detail, and only a tiny % has been done by females.

This thread is a Godwin - a-polooza (a quick perusal returns analogies to McCarthy — the most favored — and we are told was a «lightweight» in comparison), Goebbels, Sandinistas, Nazis, terrorism, Stalinism, Russian and Chinese communists, Lysenkoism, etc., full of pearl - clutching, drama - queening, and hand - wringing from fainting couches about events that apparently not one can even describe in any detail, and only a tiny % has been done by females.

Externalities may be addressed by either a tax / credit or some other public policy, public ownership and management of the commons, or privatization of the commons, or through court actions — each option may have it's own costs — for example, the large - scale privatization of the climate system may be impractical with given technology (analogy with toll roads), and even without that, it has at least an aesthetic cost (nature is supposed to be nature; and psychologically, humans may benifit from some amount of public space) and perhaps scientific (ie nature — in this context, nature as it is with relatively small impacts of humankind — is not nature if it is not being itself) costs; there may be inefficiencies in the court system that could be bypassed for issues that are easily addressed with legislation (unless we had a class - action lawsuit on behalf of all people now until the year).

An analogy is in those who seem to claim that the destruction of New Orleans was»cause d' by global warming, even if you accept that it was a significant component of the hurricane's severity.

There are are risks to the integrity of the process where, for example, the governing decision is a Supreme Court of Canada decision which purports to apply to the common law of all of the provinces — maybe even the civil law by analogy — where the decision has been considered by the appellate courts (and the trial courts) of other provinces, and one would never now that from a particular provinces's jurisprudence.

However, even if the limitation period does not apply because the claim is for an exclusively equitable remedy, the court will nonetheless apply it by analogy if the remedy in equity is «correspondent to the remedy at law».

The right to abortion — even abortion - as - self - defense — ought not have been constitutionalized, they'd argue, and ought not be broadened by analogy.

By analogy, when a state legislature fails to adopt a redistricting plan that complies with the constitution, which is normally a political question, this failure to act allows a federal court to craft a redistricting plan as a remedy for the failure of the legislature to act, in order to protect the constitutional rights of voters and candidates in future elections, even though no express language of the constitution or statute addresses the remedy when a state legislature fails to pass a redistricting plan.