The warmers have been caught red - handed deleting data, altering data, losing data, providing incorrect data, playing «tricks» with things, using non-peer reviewed science fiction, 1200 KM «smoothing,» 600 + degree temperatures in Wisconsin, wanked satellite data and
even claiming information from a magazine article as being a scientific basis proving we have global warming.
Not exact matches
Even though the social media giant
claims to have had consent, many people across the world were shocked by the sheer amount of personal
information the site has on every user.
And
even if I could get uncensored
information from private prison inmates, how would I verify their
claims?
A partnership between The Observer and the New York Times, and in collaboration with a whistleblower and former Cambridge Analytica employee unveiled a revelatory amount of
information; most significantly that Facebook sold and willingly participated in the extraction of
information for years,
even though CEO Mark Zuckerberg
claims that this was done on false pretenses.
Even if someone fails to prove that God exists, you can not
claim to have enough
information to say that God doesn't exist.
With Ricky Silberman's assistance he reassembled his brief of facts and allegations, suppressed disconfirming evidence, strong - armed a hostile witness, and blasted Mayer and Abrahamson's book to the point of denying at least one
claim that he knew was true: «Up to this point in my career,
even when I fell short, I had always believed I was pursuing accurate
information.
With the focus moving towards more regulation, manufacturers will need to be armed with as much
information about the nutritional and sensory profile of their product as possible if they want to make a «five a day» or
even «seven a day»
claim.
You jump out of no - where to
claim inside
information on rumours that have been on going for weeks and
even the Bookmakers have us as firm favourites to sign these players, yet you're acting as if you curated all this months ago??
Since the few studies GFI cites are from lesser known medical journals, and
even those studies don't fully back up their
claims, one must wonder whether they are citing all the
information they view as being «friendly» while ignoring the bulk of scientific research.
Even if the message is reaching 50 % of people who already have their kids on a regular vax schedule it's not penetrating the echo chambers of the anti-vaxers and it's not giving the pro-vaxers the
information they need to counter the
claims of their friends and acquaintances who might be anti-vax.
However, there really is not enough
information here (either in the original Chicago Tribune article, or in your interview) to be able to say whether this kind of program, which certainly is unique, could be replicated elsewhere, or
even (as Chef Paul
claims) scaled up to 8,000 students in an NSLP setting.
LITRG's guide is available from the Group's website via the link: http://www.litrg.org.uk/News/2011/2011-repayments The guide includes: An explanation of who will be getting letters from HMRC Guidance on how to check if HMRC's calculations are accurate
Information on what to do if you think the calculation is wrong or incomplete, or you do not understand it
Information about how to
claim money owed from previous tax years Examples of the letters taxpayers could write in response to receipt of a tax calculation Additionally, a question and answer guide on the 2011 PAYE reconciliation process is available on the website of the Chartered Institute of Taxation: http://tinyurl.com/taxqa2011 LITRG Chairman John Andrews said: «Taxpayers receiving letters from HMRC need to check their calculations carefully —
even if the letter says they are getting a refund.
THIS LIMITATION APPLIES REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE DAMAGES ARE
CLAIMED UNDER THE TERMS OF A CONTRACT, AS THE RESULT OF NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE, INABILITY TO USE, OR PERFORMANCE OF THE
INFORMATION, SERVICES, PRODUCTS OR MATERIALS AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE, AND
EVEN IF WE OR OUR REPRESENTATIVES HAVE BEEN NEGLIGENT OR HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
By
claiming that he could pry
information from the brain without drilling deep inside it —
information that could allow a subject to move a computer cursor, play computer games, and
even move a prosthetic limb — Schalk was taking on «a very strong existing dogma in the field that the only way to know about how the brain works is by recording individual neurons,» Schmeisser vividly recalls of that day.
«People may tell you their opinions and make
claims,» he adds, «but
even though we have a tremendous amount of
information on West Nile stockpiled, we still don't really understand why it causes more or less disease year to year.»
To be sure, the exact details of the algorithm can not be evaluated because the dating sites have not yet allowed their
claims to be vetted by the scientific community (eHarmony, for example, likes to talk about its «secret sauce»), but much
information relevant to the algorithms is in the public domain,
even if the algorithms themselves are not.
Respondents
claim that
even though they are Government contractor employees, and
even though they are working with highly expensive scientific equipment, and
even though the Government is seeking only
information about drug treatment and
information from third parties that is standard in background checks, and
even though the Government is liable for damages if that
information is ever revealed, and
even though NASA's Privacy Act regulations are very protective of private
information, NASA's background checks are unconstitutional.
The reward for all that effort would be a potentially richer array of insights into a patient than from single - source files, as anonymized patient data may contain pharmacy,
claims, doctor, and
even lab
information.
The age of polar exploration provided a wealth of
information for science to sift, while at the same time fulfilling the aspirations of nations to compete with others and
even to stake potential territorial
claims, with all the attendant allure of financial gain.
Over the years I've also received many emails full of unsubstantiated
claims, hostile remarks and
even personal attacks because of the
information presented here.
Hello, overall a fairly decent article full of good starting point
information, however one
claim that I was particularly concerned with was the following statement: «For example, sitting can't permanently or
even temporarily «shorten» your hip flexors because muscles can't change in length — they can simply become bigger or smaller.»
In the case of Josh Trank and Fantastic Four, I don't think you can believe what the internet and random people on forums are
claiming happened
even more so when the
information is second or third - hand accounts.
It is probable that if the government
claims that a situation poses a serious threat to Japan's survival,
even though it is not attacked itself and therefore decides to exercise CSD, it will also designate key
information that led to the decision as state secrets, and we will be deprived of any means to challenge and verify the government assertions.
Some articles
even went as far as making
claims about attention spans and then saying that the source of their
information was unknown.
Even though some Internet sales theories
claim that not providing pricing
information will result in the prospect contacting the dealership, the numbers seem to contradict that.
He
claimed the idea behind it all was not to develop a device that could be termed an iPad killer, but to design a product that
even the poorest could afford, thereby introducing the widest possible audience to the digital
information revolution that so far has been confined largely among the affluent section of the society.
EVEN IF Indie Book of the Day OR ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, OR (II) ANY
CLAIM ATTRIBUTABLE TO ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR OTHER INACCURACIES IN THE SERVICE AND / OR MATERIALS OR
INFORMATION DOWNLOADED THROUGH THE SERVICE.
Even though your report contains no
information about car insurance
claims or points on your license, the data has been shown to be very predictive.
It could be usernames and passwords, it could be credit card numbers, it could
even be medical
information that may be used to file
claims against your health insurance.
The lawsuit
claimed that Navient had given wrong payment
information to borrowers, processed their payments incorrectly, not responded to customer complaints, and damaged the credit scores of military veterans after reporting that they had defaulted on their loans,
even though veterans have the right to seek debt forgiveness.
In no case shall Desjardins Online Brokerage, Desjardins Securities Inc. and their directors, officers, employees or agents and its
information suppliers be held liable for any special, direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues, lost profits or loss of prospective economic advantage, resulting from the use or misuse of the Internet Services, of the
information, documents, software or content thereof,
even if advised of the possibility of such damages, or for any
claim by another party.
Although both my insurance company and I know the plaintiff's
claim is a bogus one — the plaintiff is using one of those personal injury law firms you see on late - night TV — and I know that my insurance company will do its best not to pay anything at all, I am concerned that this sort of public
information could wind up on my credit report,
even if I was to be paid a judgment in full.
If you are contacted by someone
claiming they can help with debt, do not give out any personal
information,
even if they sound credible.
They might
even claim that they «negotiated» with the financial aid office to get you more aid, when all they did was supply the financial aid administrator with the correct financial
information.
The primary consumer protection problem areas that have given rise to the States» actions include: (1) unsubstantiated
claims of consumer savings; (2) deceptive representations about the length of time necessary to complete a debt relief program; (3) misleading or failing to adequately inform consumers that they will be subject to continued collection efforts, including lawsuits, and that their account balances will increase due to extended nonpayment under the program; (4) deceptive disparagement of consumer credit counseling; (5) deceptive disparagement of bankruptcy as an alternative for debtors; (6) lack of screening and analysis to determine suitability of debt relief programs for individual debtors; (7) the collection of substantial up - front fees so the debt relief company gains
even if it fails to perform; (8) lack of transparency and
information for consumers as to payment of fees, status of accounts, and communications with creditors; (9) significant delays in active negotiation or engagement with creditors, coupled with prohibitions on direct consumer communications with creditors; and (10), in the case of debt settlement companies, basing savings
claims (and settlement fees) not on the original account balance, but on the inflated amount due (including late fees and default rates of interest) at the time of settlement.
I have been scammed three times by breeders 1 breeder was for a Norwich Terrier the other two were French bulldogs, for some reason all these so - called breeders are women they lie most of these women own only the female their use a stud service which is any person that has a male usually a fawn or red and they pay him for the stud service and
claim that their dogs are special and why they are expensive and how long they've been breeding basically most of these breeders either can't answer your questions or they hate to answer
even the slightest question red flags they don't keep in touch with you you literally have to pull teeth to get
information from them I would love to post or create a site from my experiences because most people are buying inbred Frenchie in this country the Bloodlines are so mixed
Obviously, you're much more comfortable spouting nonsensical
claims and not
even having the sense to understand that 15 years to 0 = ~ 15ppm,
even when you're spoon - fed the
information.
Maybe «deliberate irrational objectors» should be the term for people who strive to create doubts regarding the best understanding of the results of the climate science
even though their familiarity with «all of the available
information» should not lead them to try to make the
claims they try to get away with.
How does he
even imagine he can make a
claim about the global temps based on this
information?
Thus, hiding or omitting
information,
even if one feels it is «erroneous» or «outlying» (or whatever they
claim) is still possibly fraudulent (or in this case, scientifically improper) if it would «add to the total mix of available
information».
Other specialists e.g. Briffa, Cook clearly understood that, despite Mann's
claims to have achieved a hemispheric (and
even global) temperature reconstruction, Mann's network did not actually contain qualifying
information from the NH tropics — nor did the other AR4 reconstructions.
And
even if our test molecule then escapes from the atmosphere, never to return, it will still have affected all these other molecules, so the
information contained in it has not been lost as one writer
claimed.
McIntyre had also
claimed it was in the public interest to have the
information disclosed,
even though it was part of a work - in - progress.
Othere physicists
claimed it was not possible to remove
information from the universe
even in the most exotic situation imagineable — falling into a black hole — because conservation of
information is as inviolable as conservation of energy and that both conservation laws are in fact different manifestations of the same phenomenon.
And Palfrey's already started naming some of her clients, not as blackmail, or
even in an effort to raise funds, but instead, because she
claims that they have
information that would exonerate Palfrey, according to this Washington Post story, Alleged Madam Says Strategy Paying Off (April 30, 2007).
If you miss a deadline, you could have important
information missing from your
claim file and the Commission and the Commissioner will not be able to consider it when reviewing your file; or
even worse, your
claim could be dismissed altogether!
Even if ICBC initially denies a
claim on the basis of their LVI program, they will consider new
information.
Find out
even more
information about Kansas City personal injury
claims and the Kansas City personal injury attorneys who work for Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C. by reading the attached article, entitled Our Kansas City Personal Injury Attorneys can help you, today.
Arguably, if the sites provided the
information without making clear that it might not be current because records were expunged or corrected, there might be a
claim for negligent misrepresentation, false light, or
even defamation, but I seriously doubt that
even those
claims would hold up.
Their goal is to gather
information that may be used to reduce — or
even deny — your
claim.