Not exact matches
I could admittedly do better, and would certainly have captured more upside from temporary speculation, had I
committed myself to the principle that central banks will
act strictly to defend the bondholders of the banks they represent,
even if it means trespassing into fiscal policy, subordinating public interest, empowering the worst stewards of capital, violating legal restrictions, and inviting long - term instability.
(For instance I'm fairly confident that promiscuity is sinful, especially when it comes from a place of lust, but I'm less convinced that my
committed same - sex friends are sinning by expressing their love physically any more than I am sinning when my wife and I express our love physically —
even though I think we can be if we are
acting out of lust or as a means of asserting power over one another, but that is another story).
Those horrible
acts committed by by athiests were not
committed in the name of athiesm, they were not athiestic causes, whereas the Christian crusades, Islamic Jihad and
even the Israeli occupation of Palistinian land have been and are openly and proudly purpotrated by the «faithful.»
Even if a «Christian» folks
committed aweful
acts, which they did, do, and will, that's a far cry from all Christians being evil.
And by sitting, many of us are
committing the
even worse sin of failing to
act when we should be helping others.
It is not God's responsibility to stop
even Christians from
committing evil
acts though he does at times intervene.
How often have we turned on the
evening news to yet another story of someone who
committed some atrocious
act and heard the reporter interviewing that person's neighbors and acquaintances and heard «We were shocked.»
Likewise, you don't know that all humanity is evil,
even though some people
commit acts that are commonly referred to as evil.
Even where we
act in our innermost being, claiming the ultimate freedom of
committing ourselves we
act always within a preexisting sphere.
Perhaps because the Klan is universally familiar, Americans are apt to ignore or
even to laugh at it, yet to underestimate the hatred inherent in the Klan's ideology and the violent and criminal
acts that this ideology so often motivates its adherents to
commit, is to make a serious error.
True Christians were not permitted to serve in the military or otherwise participate in war or
even commit violent
acts until the concept of the «just war» — fighting only when doing so was required to protect the innocent against an aggressor — was developed hundreds of years after the death of Christ.
Even though the book of revelation may have some violent passages it is always God the father
committing the
acts and never his followers.
To the folks who are vehemently denying this person was a Christian, I would urge you to consider this: If a person with a muslim name
commits an
act of terrorism, he is immediately labelled an «Islamic» terrorist, no questions asked,
even though the Quran clearly states that a person who kills an innocent is like he / she has murdered then whole of humanity (the Quran mentions this in reference to murder of ANY innocent person, irrespective of the victims belief): To quote from the Quran: «On that account We ordained for the Children of Isra`il that if any one slew a person — unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land — it would be as if he slew the whole humanity: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole humanity.
We don't value those traits anymore, war is now something more to be avoided rather than envied, and yet you still rationalize that
even though you dislike war, that the god in the bible
committing this war is justifiable just by the simple
act that he's god?
Even when we see someone who feels that his life is meaningless and as a result contemplates and may even commit suicide, there remains that hidden sense of meaning — for to be a suicide is to say that at least in this way, if in no other, I may act out meaningfully what I think is worth do
Even when we see someone who feels that his life is meaningless and as a result contemplates and may
even commit suicide, there remains that hidden sense of meaning — for to be a suicide is to say that at least in this way, if in no other, I may act out meaningfully what I think is worth do
even commit suicide, there remains that hidden sense of meaning — for to be a suicide is to say that at least in this way, if in no other, I may
act out meaningfully what I think is worth doing.
... It is of crucial importance that the Church
acting corporately should not
commit itself to any particular policy... This refusal to adopt a particular policy is partly a matter of prudence... still more is it a matter of justice, for
even though a large majority of Christians hold a particular view, the dissentient minority may well be equally loyal re.
Beyond that our main concern must be to see that man, whose folly drove him from the Garden of Eden, does not
commit the blasphemous
act of destroying, whether in fear or in anger or in greed, the great and lovely world in which,
even in his fallen state, he has been permitted by the grace of God to live.
If I say «I look on Henry as a brother», I
commit myself to treating him as a brother,
even though in fact he does not
act like a brother.
The perpetrators
commit atrocities with such malevolence that
even the most irreligious people familiar with their
acts describe them as «unrestrained evil.»
People don't ever want to understand this,
even our lost brothers and sisters who
commit sin by suicide bombing and
committing acts of terror and taking innocent lives do not realize these things.
I think the Gunners are going to face court martial charge trial for the treasonable
act they
committed as they will be arraigned to face the Lilywhites on Sunday
evening to defend themselves.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can
even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to
act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but
even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most
committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough,
even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would
even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Once spotted she was asked to stop, and
even threatened with being told that she was
committing an indecent
act in public!
Theresa May has
committed an
act of barbarism with so little competence that it did not
even succeed.
I don't think that
even those in Africa that have
committed acts of ballot rigging have done it such a brazen manner.»
The UK has not ratified the amendment to the Rome Statute which would activate the Court's jurisdiction over
acts of aggression allegedly
committed by UK nationals and,
even if it did, the amendment's provisions would not apply retroactively.
She urged voters to elect lawmakers to both houses of the State Legislature who are
committed to enacting
even more rigorous legislation, noting that some Republicans have sought to stop the establishment of the ammunition registry the SAFE
Act requires.
The secretary of state says
even though the legislature hasn't passed the Dream
Act — legislation that would assist children whose parents are in the country illegally go to college — the governor is
committed to the proposed legislation.
Even under the Affordable Care
Act, as the state touts more than 2 million new enrollees in both Medicaid and commercial insurance plans, the state is not planning to spend any less on charity care — the state's budget
commits nearly $ 800 million each year for the next five years to help hospitals defray the costs of providing care to the uninsured.
The clearout from the government of Dominic Grieve, Ken Clarke and Damian Green propagates the real possibility that the Conservatives will go into next year's election
committed to repealing the Human Rights
Act, and
even possibly leaving the European convention on human rights.
The Old Testament unambiguously describes a God who is advocating people to
commit war crimes and
even acts of genocide:
UK citizens who
commit sex offences abroad will face prosecution when they return to the UK -
even if the
act was legal in the country in which it took place.
In a dramatic last part of the debate, Perry
even accused some of her more
committed pro-Brexit colleagues of
acting like Islamic extremists during the debates in the Commons in recent weeks.
Even after making statistical allowances for factors such as psychiatric disorders, economic status, and prior violent
acts, they found that those who watched 1 to 3 hours of TV per day were about 60 % more likely to get in a serious fight, threaten someone, or use a weapon to
commit a crime than those who watched less than an hour a day.
They both care so much; they have so much empathy towards the human race,
even though they are both capable of
committing horrific
acts of violence,» he explains.
Bruce Dern (Coming Home, The «burbs) gives us another memorable crackpot performance, except in this one, he is sympathetically portrayed, and
even though he
commits some
acts that most people would constitute as despicable in theory, Dern imbues his character with enough vulnerability to make it work.
For instance, most audiences perceive Leonard as a good guy, which doesn't change
even when they see him
commit a violent
act early in the film.
It isn't long before he
commits an illegal and unethical
act that haunts him
even as he finally enjoys the pleasures of material success.
After all, he is convinced that Lara is incapable of having
committed such a heinous
act,
even if the legal system has concluded otherwise, and far beyond a reasonable doubt.
Now it appears as if it's impossible to remove them
even if they have
committed a lewd
act.
The
act of choosing simply means we've
committed ourselves to a set of behaviors greater than the sum of our individual inclinations: I will listen to his sadness,
even when I'm deep in my own.
So whether you want to go through this article once, twice, three times, bookmark this page, or
even print it out and hang it on your bathroom mirror, we recommend not only
committing a lot of this information to memory but actually
acting on it.
Even though the explosion, fire, and damage are the result of a criminal and intentional
act, it's not a criminal or intentional
act committed by those 146 insureds.
Your details may also be used to
commit serious crimes, such as money laundering and
even terrorist
acts.
Even after the Ministerio Publico Federal (the Federal Prosecutor Bureau) declared that no crime had been
committed in any of the above - mentioned cases and issued a technical note clarifying that nudity and representations of sexuality are permitted in cultural and artistic exhibitions, the consequences continue to unfold: the state of Espirito Santo has passed a law prohibiting the exhibition of photographs, texts, drawings, paintings, films and videos containing nude scenes or references to sexual
acts in public spaces; city councilors of the state of Rio Grande do Sul are currently trying to ban books in public libraries that, they argue, expose children to «permissive ideologies, [detrimental] to the formation of character.»
«for me to raise
even the driest, most analytical criticisms or questions regarding the frame of reference of the «climate science» orthodoxy is to
commit a revolutionary
act.»
In fact, he
even mentions that desmogblog still has the documents online
even though they are not verified yet, going so far as to claim that this may be a criminal
act committed by desmogblog.
PJA 2006, s 36 substitutes a new s 3 into CMA 1990 which criminalises inter alia
committing a knowingly - unauthorised
act, or series of
acts, in relation to a computer, with the intent to impair its operation —
even temporarily — or being reckless as to that impairment.
I have also heard the argument that the User is causing the Service to
commit an illegal
act, hence the User is responsible (
even though no contract was signed by the user).
Even if someone is already being charged with having
committed a criminal
act, if the criminal
act (such as causing an accident and then fleeing the scene of such accident) resulted in the injury of another, regardless of whether or not the accident was caused by recklessness, distracted driving or, say, a DUI, the injured party can — and should — make a claim against the liable individual.