Sentences with phrase «even dangerous ideas»

Or the pair of evangelical professors who wrote an article in The New York Times, criticizing evangelical leaders for their «rejection of knowledge» and for embracing «discredited, ridiculous and even dangerous ideas» — such as believing that homosexual behavior is sinful and that Darwin was wrong.

Not exact matches

we can all be civil and learn from eachother even if we have contradicting ideas, it's when someone is so set in there ways not allowing new information in is when i get dangerous

I have no idea how he is so high in polls, or even still in the race, but his ideas are not only dangerous for the founding principles of the US, but it is also potentially dangerous for atheists, agnostics, pagans, and others who do not believe in an Abrahamic god.

There is, to be sure, an element of «put - down» here: I intend to put down the arrogant delusion of intellectuals that they are superior human beings and the even more dangerous idea that, by virtue of their putatively superior qualities, they constitute a moral or even political elite.

Dude, science has shown that water birth is dangerous, but even a lay person like Henci Goer could figure out that submerging newborns in fetid poop water is probably a horrible idea.

They thought it was a strange and bad idea, dangerous even.

I had no idea that this would be such an offensive choice to many, and even considered dangerous by some.

«Even in a perfect world where energy companies didn't make mistakes, nuclear power is and always has been a dangerous idea because there is no good way to store nuclear waste.

Even more dangerous may be the common idea that an addict must hit «rock bottom» before recovery is possible: it encourages helplessness and dissuades addicts from taking agency over their lives, Szalavitz argues.

INCREASING the distance between yourself and a potentially dangerous assailant is always a good idea — even if your ultimate aim is to render them insensible.

* Training / Behavior Modification hasn't resulted in an acceptable change in the dog; * There is significant risk and / or evidence that dog is going to seriously injure someone; aggression problems don't automatically mean the dog will injure someone or is dangerous; I am referring to the idea that even with reasonable precautions, supervision, training and behavior modification, the dog is still going to get around all of that and hurt someone; * You have made a reasonable effort to work with the dog and situation; meaning you have PAID a professional to help you, worked the situation properly and diligently, and you still can't trust the dog to not hurt itself, another animal or a person; * The dog is so dangerous you can't place the dog with someone else; * The owner isn't willing, or is unable, or unqualified, to work with the dog any further, even with supervised professional help; some people won't follow instructions, so some of these dogs would be fine in the hands of someone else, but not the current owner; * Regardless what you do (behavior modification, training, and / or behavioral medications) nothing has made the dog manageable, and your trainer is recommending you consider euthanasia; * Even behavioral medications can't alleviate the problem; I am experienced working with drugs prescribed by veterinarians and can give you feedback as to how things are going, or when you might wish to consider another drug; * This dog is too dangerous to work weven with reasonable precautions, supervision, training and behavior modification, the dog is still going to get around all of that and hurt someone; * You have made a reasonable effort to work with the dog and situation; meaning you have PAID a professional to help you, worked the situation properly and diligently, and you still can't trust the dog to not hurt itself, another animal or a person; * The dog is so dangerous you can't place the dog with someone else; * The owner isn't willing, or is unable, or unqualified, to work with the dog any further, even with supervised professional help; some people won't follow instructions, so some of these dogs would be fine in the hands of someone else, but not the current owner; * Regardless what you do (behavior modification, training, and / or behavioral medications) nothing has made the dog manageable, and your trainer is recommending you consider euthanasia; * Even behavioral medications can't alleviate the problem; I am experienced working with drugs prescribed by veterinarians and can give you feedback as to how things are going, or when you might wish to consider another drug; * This dog is too dangerous to work weven with supervised professional help; some people won't follow instructions, so some of these dogs would be fine in the hands of someone else, but not the current owner; * Regardless what you do (behavior modification, training, and / or behavioral medications) nothing has made the dog manageable, and your trainer is recommending you consider euthanasia; * Even behavioral medications can't alleviate the problem; I am experienced working with drugs prescribed by veterinarians and can give you feedback as to how things are going, or when you might wish to consider another drug; * This dog is too dangerous to work wEven behavioral medications can't alleviate the problem; I am experienced working with drugs prescribed by veterinarians and can give you feedback as to how things are going, or when you might wish to consider another drug; * This dog is too dangerous to work with.

Even if you have raw, unsalted bacon, it isn't a good idea to use it as a dog treat — the fat content is still very high, the preservatives involved in curing bacon may harm your dog's health, and raw meat may contain dangerous pathogens or parasites.

This is much the same thing we saw with dangerous drugs being given to people, but maybe even more unfair because pet owners had no idea these pills could be so harmful.

It was Dunbar who began the notion of puppy classes when most veterinarians thought the idea was unnecessary, or even dangerous, for fear of disease transmission.

It is never a good idea to go surfing or even in the sea after drinking alcohol and this is when the beach can become very dangerous.

Even local developers are making games for US audiences and that really pisses me off so much, not because of nationalism, I have no quarrel with any country and I know they do it to play it «safe», but the idea of simply missing the chance to develop your own market because you want to play with the «big boys» is not only stupid from a marketing point of view, it's downright dangerous, you CA N'T compete with monster - like comapnies unless you are big enough yourself, you are just gonna get swallowed and turned into another subsidiary for EA before you get to make anything that's worth remembering, and worse, before you make anything that makes you happy as a developer.

Some hardcore players long for the old days, and some armchair designers even push the idea of permanent death as a way to create more tense and dangerous online worlds.

Even with players who have clearly divided their responsibilities and communicate well, Lovers in Dangerous Spacetime can be very difficult and it's a great idea to take breaks at times, especially when frustration seems to set in.

That act of creating the freedom for ideas she sees as radical, and even dangerous — but a «soft power,» to be sure.

«The most «dangerous» technological idea that could mean that even the climate change won't be enough to establish the world government and cripple the world's economy: Artificial volcanos.»

On a lone and desolate promontory clings one last living human who shrieks into the maelstrom a final defiance even as the pitiless rain clogs his throat: «In the church of climate alarmism, there may be no heresy more dangerous than the idea that the world will benefit from warming.»

It has been Republicans who have long refused to even entertain the idea that climate change is dangerous or human - caused.

Regarding long term outcomes, I tend to agree with flxible that even short term outcomes don't look good but it seems to me that Wasdell is at least showing that if the international community wants to avoid 2C (because of some arbitrary idea of where dangerous climate change will kick in, agreed on years ago) then it can't do it without removing atmospheric greenhouse gases and so any notion that some emissions reduction agreement can do the trick are delusions.

As far as the folks in my community are concerned, most of them are fuming over the whole idea because it is going to make things even more crowded for those who live here and their kids who go to school and play in the residential area that is becoming more dangerous for them every day.