Sentences with phrase «even debate with»

There are many networking opportunities to meet, learn with, consult and even debate with a diverse group of professionals all committed to excellence in resolving family conflict.

I don't have an issue at all, and I don't even debate with Chrisitans, UNTIL, they try and shove their doctrine on me and my country.

I know I've struggled with this — even debated it with my brother who's Ph.D encompasses the analysis of educational systems.

Not exact matches

The fact that the spotlight on Holt is so bright before the debate has even begun is partly a result of the media's intense criticism of his NBC colleague Matt Lauer's performance hosting a forum with Trump and Clinton last month.

In a supervisory setting, good leaders are able to debate and argue behind closed doors and then fully support a decision in public — even if they privately disagree with that decision.

With debate continuing to rage over whether the economy is on the verge or even in the grip of a recession, many entrepreneurs in startup mode may be getting a crippling case of cold feet.

(Yet Trump also likes to play cat - and - mouse with Fox and others over whether he will attend debates, which earns him even more free publicity.)

With the New Hampshire presidential primary just a few short days away, the two remaining Democratic candidates, Vermont senator Bernie Sanders and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, take to the debate stage Thursday evening.

While I've got a new comment open, though, here's my thoughts on the Roth debate: It's generally good to diversify your funds as much as possible, tax-wise; nobody can say with absolute certainty what the tax system will look like numerous years from now (although the smart money says that it'll probably be even more complex than our current system).

How else can it be explained that segwit was merged into the code (even if not activated) with practically no public debate whatsoever?

SCRANTON — With the primary election two weeks away, two adversaries provided the fireworks as five Democratic House candidates debated Tuesday evening and largely agreed on issues.

I have never been even remotely an expert either on iron and steel production or on the Australian economy, but recent action in the iron ore markets and a vibrant debate within Australia has, in the past three weeks, set me up for several planned and unplanned meetings with Australians — some old friends, some fund managers and bankers, some government officials — who remembered some of the comments I made a few years ago about Australia and iron ore and who wanted to discuss future prospects.

By STANDARD SHAEFER (Interview with Michael Hudson, author of Super Imperialism, Pluto Press, 2003) Now that even the LA Times has begun to show a modicum of willingness to discuss US foreign policy in terms of a potential imperialism, it has become clear that those on the right have avoided this debate so far only by sticking to the strictest, most out - dated notion of empire.

While most people will tune in to the television, radio, or even the mobile web for their debate coverage, we're seeing large numbers of users install new applications for the first time to engage with the debate.

It's a bit of a dilemma, and one that might be better explored in a new side - blog, as I don't want to confuse this one even more with the active / passive debate.

The madcap meeting with Trump on guns, which was meant to add clarity and more urgency to the debate, instead saw the president undermining the importance of «due process,» calling for «comprehensive» gun control, and even humoring the idea of an assault weapons ban — all somewhat unexpected positions for a GOP president to hold.

It is not clear to me at all, even if we do get past the issues with mining centralization, segregated witness, lightning networks and hard forks, that Bitcoin (or Bitcoin - like) blockchain - based cryptocurrencies are the way to do it, but I'm open to informed debate on this point.

Romney and Ryan were winning the Medicare debate even with all of Obama's advantages.

This is the frame of thinking that Jesus himself seems to be embroiled in in debates with people in the Pharisee and Saducee's sects (even the Herodians and other scribes of the law).

With the assistance of foresighted men like Msgr. Oesterreicher, and the unofficial but crucial input from Jewish historians and theologians, the declaration — after numerous drafts, several years of intense debate, and even a last second bid by reactionaries to thwart it — was voted on and finally passed at the Council, by an overwhelming margin.

like former leader... we too have kept open house and had people live with us long and short term for nearly all our married life... we've had debate, argument, sadness, hilarity... even had someone with a disturbing psychosis... not at one stage have we felt the need to make any rules... that would almost be like copping out of relationship.

And even that is under debate in my head and in our community because I somehow believe that this «Jesus» so embraces a universal comprehension of all things and all people, with no one excluded because of race, religion, sex or politic, that Jesus implodes to the point of disappearing, or, becoming the all in all.

With the Book of Mormon, you can't even debate that way: you'd have to debate whether the people of anti-Nephi Levi (for example) ever existed at all.

I wonder... these sorts of tactics are even applied in politics and sports debates, and maybe even with arguments over favorite ice cream flavors....

He has not addressed even ONE of the issues involved with AB debate, not theological, not legal, not scientific.

Even though some have ridiculed the statement in their rebuttals above, I'll just go ahead and say it anyway... the Calvinist debate just does not sit well with my spirit, I feel an uneasiness that I can't quite put into words.

Even we can debate according to Scriptures and cross reference with the best manuscript available, the Word of God and Rhema Word of God is still being experienced and intepreted differently and uniquely by all of us though it could similar but not the same.

THEY can't even agree on important stuff... it allows for endless escape holes when they get pinned in debates about God with atheist.)

There was little desire to compare them with mystics of other traditions and times or even to discuss serious debate within Sufism itself.

Perhaps both subjects, the Son of David Messiahship and the return of Elijah before the end, were questions of even greater moment within the Christian community than in the unadjourned debate with the synagogue.

My piece was not a «lament,» but essentially a defense of Pope Benedict (as was my brief follow - up here) against just the type of over-the-top criticisms cited elsewhere in Allen's article, even as I raised one respectful question about the pope's prudential decision not to meet with leading dissidents — a legitimate, good - faith debate among sincere Catholics.

Now I do nt thave to go into history of church with athiest here or even debate because ifor those who do not beleive no explanation will suffice.

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

Held at St Nicholas Church in Durham Market Place, each evening began with drama and song, then Bishop Paul and other guests took part in a debate around key issues.

Even the questions concerning the pastoral care of divorced and civilly remarried Catholics, and of homosexual couples — both topics of heated debate at last October's Synod of Bishops — are in the end based on theological foundations, and deal with the application of doctrine.

I'll also accept the answer of «nothing» that will change your mind because at least we'll agree that since nothing can change your mind it's impossible to debate or even hold a discussion with you and we'll go our separate ways.

The revolutionary developments already erupting in his own day still confront us with the relativistic and quantum mechanical portrayals of whatever «atoms» are deemed ultimate, and even more so than in the life sciences this development within the physical sciences spawned a continuing spiral of philosophic debate as to their proper interpretation.

Christians have debated the topics of divinity and trinity for two thousand years, but all agree that the most important thing Jesus taught was love — love God with all your heart, love your neighbor as yourself, and love even your enemies.

In most cases they have overcome both political fragmentation and government overload by replacing their old governmental bureaucracies with an innovative and effective form of governance: coalitions (composed of business, government, nonprofits, universities, neighborhood and minority associations, and religious groups) that develop a cooperative agenda to improve the city and that assume many of the city government's traditional functions (economic development, long - term planning, educational reform, even care of the homeless), and that also operate like political parties of yore (providing the point of access for new groups and a public realm for discourse, debate, and negotiation concerning matters of the common good).

Ro 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

Even with a magisterium, Catholicism has its own internal debates as to what weight to give to what authorities and how to interpret them in light of one another.

When I have debated with members of SIMS the question of whether TM is Hinduism or a religion at all, they have employed a most peculiar argument which they attribute to the Maharishi: since TM does not demand that one be a Hindu or even religious to take lessons, therefore TM is neither Hinduism nor is it a religion.

I could sit at this keyboard for days on end debating individual biblical verses with you, but unless you take that first step you still won't see the overall picture — and yes, there is one, even bigger and more wonderful than the one you currently cling to.

Colin, as in ALL my debates with atheists... you have resorted to your first bread and butter, which is to describe the process of natural evolution that not even Christians dispute.

Kinda makes a poor judge of character, so if you are willing to debate freely in a conversation on life, the world, the pursuit of knowledge, and all the unknowns in the world with an underage male, then I encourage you to continue the debate freely, but if you feel outmatched in a knowledge criteria and you wish to avoid shame of not understanding enough or even not knowing enough (because they are different) then i will gently step aside as not to harm your ego.

The chairman of Christian Aid also appeared to blame the ongoing debate over Europe on a growing sense of nationalism in the UK, he said: «With the Scottish independence agitation and all the questions about a federal UK quite a lot of people feel we need to affirm now what we are, what we distinctively are as English even more than British and that imperceptibly I think strengthens some of this unease about that mysterious entity called Europe which is over there.»

Or again, contemporary debate with the non-Christian public they wished to win, or even within the Christian community itself, might lead them to a possibly unbalanced elaboration of certain aspects of the sayings.

The question has been debated with even greater intensity in the last few decades.

British scholar N. T. Wright, who has engaged in debates with liberal Jesus Seminar leaders, wrote in the August 2001 issue that the huge U.S. success of the «Left Behind» series «appears puzzling, even bizarre» on the other side of the Atlantic.

Even Rudy Giuliani, who has some very real problems with his adherence, had the good sense to respond, when asked about his possibly being refused Communion: «I do not get into debates with the pope.