[And yes, like Princeton, I agree we need to do some R&D now to ensure a steady flow of technologies to make
the even deeper emissions reductions needed in the second half of the century.]
By providing a mechanism to capture more of these low - cost emissions reduction opportunities, this innovative tool — the first - of - its - kind in emissions trading markets — could potentially get to
the even deeper emissions reductions that NRDC and other groups urged the states to adopt.
Some did not sign, because they thought
even deeper emissions cuts are needed.
Not exact matches
Deep cuts in
emissions are necessary in order to save
even a fraction of existing reefs, according to the team's results.
(
Deeper reserves must be forced to the surface by an injection of pressurized steam, with
even greater
emissions; about 40 percent of Canadian oil from the sands is produced this way.)
Professor Corinne Le Quéré, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of East Anglia, says the paper is «timely» and makes it «very clear» that
even steep and
deep emissions reductions will not be sufficient unless accompanied by a net - zero
emissions strategy.
We will need to see a
deep decline if we are to limit dangerous climate change, and
even with existing
emissions - reduction commitments, global
emissions are not expected to decline until at least after 2030.
In the presence of such unknowns, a push for robustness tends to mean a push for
deeper emissions cuts,
even if those might turn out to cost more than actual climate sensitivity ultimately justifies.
Unless we make
deep and swift cuts in our heat - trapping
emissions, 26 Europe could experience a heat wave similar to the one in 2003 every other year by the end of this century.23 A summer like that of 2003 would be considered ordinary4 — or
even cool.25 Summers in central Europe are expected to feel like those in southern European today.27
«With some level of warming and sea level rise already in the pipeline no matter what we do, we won't see a reduction in impacts or
even a sudden levelling - off — impacts are projected to increase at the same rate in all scenarios for the next couple of decades or so, and after that they merely increase more slowly in the
deep emissions cuts scenarios,» Betts told Mongabay.
But it's also important that policymakers around the world understand that,
even if we were to make
deep and rapid
emissions cuts, we would not see the difference those cuts made immediately.
«A sea level rise of up to 0.5 meters by 2100 may already be unavoidable
even in a scenario of
deep emissions cuts — we estimate that this could inundate 2000 square kilometers in Bangladesh, which is 1.6 percent of the country and would affect 2.5 million people.
Even its supporters conceded that the technology, if it worked, would have no impact on global
emissions until at least the 2030s, well beyond the time scientists say
deep emission cuts must begin.
(Bernie Fraser, Chairman, Climate Change Authority): «The funding of the kind of scale that would be necessary to deal with the extra
emissions reductions that Australia will have to pursue to do its bit to reduce global
emissions makes it quite fanciful I think to think that the ERF could be scaled up and funded to the degree that one would think would be necessary»... (John Connor, CEO Climate Institute): «The debate is shifting into
even deeper reductions that we need to have beyond 2020 and it shows that the
emissions reduction fund is just an inadequate tool to be the primary tool for
emission reductions, while the renewable energy target is a critical target that we need to be strengthening, not weakening.
That suggests the risks of climate change are greater than feared, and that we'll have to cut
emissions even deeper to prevent dangerous levels of warming.