Sentences with phrase «even deeper question»

Framed in this way, Cory Arcangel's survey exhibit «Masters «seemed - in theory - on track for an «A» game as it promised to ask an even deeper question about speed: As we blow through endless upgrades of hardware and software in our glorious skim on the information superhighways, where is it exactly that we think we are going?

Or, an even deeper question might be: Will the sale of annuities — even with innovations — ever thrive in a fee - based environment?

They want to take whatever one has learned about E. coli and then ask an even deeper question using E. coli.

However, Wheeler's phrase does rather side - step an even deeper question: how is it that matter «tells» space - time how to curve?

Siegler's discovery opens the door to further discoveries around an even deeper question — the mystery of why there is water on the moon and on Earth.

But real commitment requires an even deeper dive with even deeper questions: How do you each feel about taking care of aging parents?

Not exact matches

Dig Deeper: How to Build a Culture of Employee Appreciation How to Create a Company Philosophy: School New Hires on Company History Even if you ask some pointed or provocative questions in the interview and get the answers you're looking for, your newest recruit isn't going to be integrated into the company culture on day one.

Which platforms to be on is a crucial question, even for the most deep - pocketed brands.

In this deeper, more intuitive - driven stage of listening, you're free to release tension and doubt, helping prepare you for difficult questions, rejections or even objections.

SEO ramifications were not entirely flushed out, even as moderator Danny Sullivan and the eager audience asked penetrating questions to delve deeper, but just consider a simple brand preference scenario.

It gets under our skin, hits us at a level deeper than our thoughts or even our passions, troubles oldest certainties till all questions are reopened, and in general shocks us more fully awake than we are for most of our lives?

Returning to the question of why Watanabe's prints appeal strongly to contemporary American Christians, I suggest that the answer lies in an expression of faith deeper and broader than even Watanabe may realize.

Experiences of grief — or even experiences of extreme joy or ecstasy — shatter the willing suspension of our doubts and raise questions about the deeper meanings of life.

This author in my opinion deep inside is questioning her faith but like a security blanket to a child does not want to get rid of it and is looking for any explanation she can come up with to hold onto it even in the face of the reality that the text that faith is based upon is highly flawed and frankly quite silly.

(B) If we were to become aware of another individual, or even several people, who seem to point to God and to the deepest truths as consistently and accurately as Jesus of Nazareth, we would still have another question.

Some attend while still in short - term or even long - term partnerships, desiring a safe place to assess where they are at and to ask some deeper questions.

Even as young teenagers, even as preteens, they're attuned in many ways to paradox, to suffering, to the deep questions of faEven as young teenagers, even as preteens, they're attuned in many ways to paradox, to suffering, to the deep questions of faeven as preteens, they're attuned in many ways to paradox, to suffering, to the deep questions of faith.

Instead, the historian's task was seen to consist in understanding those deep - lying intentions of the past, by involving one's selfhood in an encounter in which one's own intentions and views of existence are put in question, and perhaps altered or even radically reversed.

Their hesitation primarily stems from the question of whether the notion of emptiness, conceived as a dynamic emptying of all distinctions, can sustain a commitment to ethics, history», and personhood with the seriousness and even ultimacy that they, precisely as people standing in the Christian tradition, think necessary The Jewish participant, while less concerned with kenosis, shares their concern for the potential loss of ultimacy in the realm of historical action with its ethical norms and deep sense of personhood.

A few of the obvious drives that pack us off, daily or weekly or episodically or, for some, in hope, permanently, are fear or even terror in the particular given set of circumstances; the sheer discouragement and exhaustion of facing questions without answer; profound disillusionment — it takes many forms — with the pertinent, prevailing system or systems; deep and bitter contempt for one's own society, bred of the abysmal failure to attain in consistent practice even a semblance of the justice professed and acclaimed; despair — so it was with the college generation of the late sixties — over the formidable obduracy of a political establishment in going its merciless way quite apparently deaf to the cries of anguish of its empathetic and real victims, victims by the tens of millions here and around the world.

They just know it, deep down in the fibers of their being, and that they never have to question it, earn it, try to keep it or even be thinking about it.

And yet, these deep flaws in conservative jurisprudence come into sight even more dramatically if we return to that question of abortion, and look back forty years to the briefs and the dissenting opinions that were offered in Roe v. Wade.

I believe, this question of ultimate meaning looms with greater and greater importance as we delve even deeper into the mysteries of existence, including the theoretical implications of the Big Bang theory (cf. Robert Jastrow, God and the Astronomers, 1978).

They are grappling, as we all do, with something about us that goes even deeper than questions about ethics and morality («sins»), as important as those questions are.

He's a bit overrated I must say.I also don't get those who are asking him to tackle well.The fact is he's not a good tackler.I fear Wenger has made him untouchable in our team such that even if he plays badly he still starts.I mean if people are saying he's not a DM in the first place then is he also a CM?If he's a CM does he have the quality to play along side a DM?These are the questions we need to ask ourselves.If he's a CM then he's good at distributing from deep and also up top but he can't hold thd ball in tight spaces or dribble which is very important.If he's a DM then he simply can't defend.That's why for us to be successful in the long term with him we need a hybrid midfielder or what I call a defensive box to box midfielder.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Even with the questions and no Williams, this is a Gonzaga team that is deep and talented (even more so if Williams sigEven with the questions and no Williams, this is a Gonzaga team that is deep and talented (even more so if Williams sigeven more so if Williams signs).

In response to a follow - up question from Gotham Gazette, Stringer's spokesperson said that the current city housing plan is not geared enough toward those in deeper poverty and with current subsidies favoring low - income households, those with extremely low - income or virtually no income face even more pressure, especially when the rezonings are taken into consideration, given that they can risk furthering the threats of displacement.

Even more recently, many have questioned the appropriateness of the governor's promoting a top aide with deep family ties to powerful lobbyists to the highest - ranking position in his administration.

But openDemocracy has now discovered that Cambridge Analytica's establishment links run even deeper, leading to one of the most senior figures in Northern Irish unionism — a PR man who has represented everyone from British Airways to Russian oligarchs — and raising questions once more about who gave the DUP a secretive # 435,000 donation for its Brexit campaign.

The footprints were apparently made in water deep enough to have remained submerged even at low tide, which raises the question of what the dinosaurs were doing in waters that deep.

Indeed, the dangers posed by cosmic radiation are so daunting that even some members of the normally upbeat astronaut corps are beginning to question whether a human mission to deep space will be feasible anytime in the near future.

Red light travels such short distances in water that many scientists had questioned whether deep - sea animals could even see it.

The current generation of 8 — 10 meter telescopes continues to expand our understanding of the very early Universe, but many of the great mysteries and unanswered questions will remain until TMT opens its extraordinarily powerful eye and probes even deeper into the furthest reaches of our Universe.

NASA and aerospace engineers have designs and dreams to take our vision even deeper into the universe and answer some of astronomy's most puzzling questions.

To take this even deeper and explore how your body is expressing your inner experience, you can reflect on the following three questions:

The deeper and more personal questions are harder to ask, but they may be even more necessary: Is there anything inside me holding me back from supporting women?

His decision to probe deeper into his own muddled thoughts is also influenced by the fact that Shaw — think of a young, better looking John Kerry with a war record that, on the face of it, even Karl Rove couldn't question — is now a seemingly sure - fire candidate for vice president.

Now do we take that to mean he's questioning Kirk's desire to explore in the wake of Into Darkness, or have the crew been into their «five year mission» in deep space for a while, indeed have they even completed that mission?

Beyond the unique gameplay, there's a lot of deeper questions being asked by way of clever storytelling as you play, and it's also one of those games that isn't quite done even when you think you've beat it.

At barely over two hours, the movie is over before I even knew it, in such constant motion heading deeper and deeper into the gloomy waters of the subconscious revealing answers to personal questions those who must grapple with them only thought they wanted to know before finding themselves gob - smacked by the truth.

Even without a deeper interest in answering the questions that it asks (in sharp contrast to the introspective, almost silent WALL · E), it's still light years ahead of Disney's spate of racist, misanthropic entertainments and / or direct - to - video sequels that cynically transform their Vault ™ into a McDonald's franchise.

Even when the script pulls out a few twists near the conclusion, it's still somehow left open - ended, but the revelations add a deeper appreciation to the questions raised throughout the film.

The central triumph of Black Panther, though it's merely one of many, is that the story Coogler and his cowriter, Joe Robert Cole, have devised is even better and richer than could have been imagined — not only because it owes so much to racial questions of the kind the Marvel Universe hasn't encountered before, but also because we're 17 movies deep into said universe and well versed in its foibles and missed opportunities.

Our students are naturally curious, but they may need further support to articulate those questions and ask even deeper and more targeted questions.

From my English 10 sophomores to my AP Literature seniors, my students ask deep, penetrating questions and explore ideas with curiosity — even those who don't start out that way in August.

But questions remain about whether even those financial incentives can convince states already grappling with a deep recession to overhaul troubled charter authorizing systems, push aside political opposition and shift funds away from traditional public schools.

In many cases, school leaders need to delve even deeper into a question and look for effective ways to make this process successful.

It didn't take long before I started busting through our adjoining door — like Jerry Seinfeld's neighbor Kramer in his television show — with a content notebook in hand, asking even more questions about student work and diving deeper into the craft of teaching math.

She said creating open - response questions in particular allowed her to «put herself in her students» shoes, imagining how best to get them to not just answer the question, but elaborate,» which helped her understand her students even better and develop deeper connections with them.