But whether it does or not, I doubt that we here, now, can settle or
even discuss our differences over abortion by making comparisons between a woman's own fetus and an enslaved stranger.
So complete,
it even discusses the difference between RRSPs and the U.S. equivalents.
Not exact matches
And with that said... I certainly agree with what - Frogist said, and I would just add that
even in being «kind» and «respectful»
discussing your «beliefs» would not necessarily cause you or other believers to feel «a whole lot of
difference.»
We are obligated to listen to one another, and to
discuss our
differences across denominational lines, theological persuasions — and
even across the center aisle of the sanctuary (where one side of the church prefers Paul Tillich, the other side, Left Behind).
And should not
even the
differences be
discussed in mutual forbearance so there might be a growth in understanding?
He
discusses many suggestions as to how the
difference can be told, and rejects
even the most plausible ones.
So this mindset puts you add odds with a whole lot of other people, who
even though they may disagree on things, may actually be able to
discuss their
differences in a civilized way.
He also
discusses how doing something as basic as planting a garden to grow
even a little of your own food could make a big
difference.
And, because of Kevin's work with his wife AnnMarie on their skincare line, we also
discuss some surprising
differences in the various skincare products on the market today (
even those marketed as «natural»).
In
discussing the limited evidence for the «probable» link between red meat and colorectal cancer, the WHO itself concedes that it is not possible to rule out other explanations (which it helpfully describes as «chance, bias or confounding»).2 Harcombe agrees, arguing that
even when studies strive to adjust statistically for baseline
differences in relevant factors such as socioeconomic status, body mass index, physical activity, smoking status and diabetes, it is impossible to grapple fully with all the factors that differentiate «the couch potato» from «the paleo buff» (her ideal), or to take into account the «chasm» that separates fresh and traditionally preserved meats from modern manufactured meat products.9
This can be philosophical, educational, or
even successfully
discussing differences of opinion.
PISA results show that when students
discuss money matters with their parents, they have significantly higher financial literacy skills,
even after accounting for
differences in socio - economic background and their performance in other subjects.
School funding inequality isn't limited to the oft -
discussed state - level disparities — in fact, national spending
differences paint an
even bleaker picture.
There are no lawyers explaining the
difference between commercial and residential units; there are no mortgage brokers on hand to teach attendees about the rules and regulations about investment property financing; there's not
even a real estate agent to
discuss the intricacies of the local market, never mind details about specific types of housing or ideal neighbourhoods.
With his show at Simon Lee gallery opening this
evening, the legendary Italian artist, and one of the key figures in the arte povera movement,
discusses the solace of creativity, reflecting self in society and searching for the «third paradise» of connecting
difference
They're the adults now who don't have any particular interest in science but «remember the science from school» and so unlikely to question whatever the AGW green agenda pushes, and
even those in actual science fields where real knowledge of gas properties isn't relelevant, but what I find astonishing though, is how many in actual science fields who come together to
discuss AGW continue to not question something as basic as the
difference between heat and light claims in the AGW energy budget which is well known still in the real science world.
Solutions that could make a
difference are not
even being considered, let alone
discussed.
This
difference is actually quite small, so I'm not sure why we're
even discussing it in the first place.
And here I
discuss the
difference in public attention when the IPCC understated central claims (such as sea level rise, Arctic sea ice melt, and emission scenarios) to when they overstated a detail that didn't
even make it into the technical summary — exactly how fast the Himalayan glaciers would melt.
IMO it's misleading, because the US administration is still insisting (a) on only
discussing emissions intensity targets (for reducing, not total emissions, but only the rate of growth of US emissions), and US emissions intensity will reduce
even under business as usual; and (b) the US administration is still insisting on only considering voluntary targets, despite the fact that
even many major US corporations are calling for mandatory caps and despite the fact that there is no evidence that their existing voluntary targets have made any
difference.
And
even better: the chapter includes original research content (see ¶ ¶ 8.19 — 8.32,
discussing the history of and
difference between «reasonable efforts» and «best efforts»), which litigators might want to cite as authoritative, when making arguments about how a court should interpret these provisions — the same way we sometimes cite Scalia and Garner's book on canons of textual interpretation.
Even though you may have your
differences, as
discussed above, you only need one thing for your divorce mediation to be a success.
Discussing any
differences in the presence of an objective couples counselor can help you put things in perspective, nurture your relationship's best qualities, and
even recognize some
differences of opinion as healthy.
Even if you hotly disagree with each other on a contentious issue, you should still be able to
discuss your
differences of opinion without resorting to yelling, screaming or name calling.
As
discussed in Chapter 2, any
difference in opinion,
even with contentious and personal views like politics or ideology, is portrayed as dysfunction.