There are
even early church fathers that have influenced what we believe today who did not believe Adam and Eve were literal people, but allegorical symbols of the sinfulness of all humanity.
Not exact matches
Even though history clearly speaks to Paul dying at the hands of Nero, all the apostles except John being murdered, and
early church fathers such as Polycarp being killed by Rome?
He believed his chances for faith had been hurt by his
father, the
early loss of his mother, the air of unbelief in the
Church of his youth,
even the «terrible» liturgy and the modernized music (pitfalls he counted «inherent in Protestantism»).
In fact, by confusing Tradition with traditionalism and radically opposing the Scriptures to Tradition, much of the Christian wisdom Tradition, beginning with the writings of the
early Church Fathers (& Mothers) and continuing
even into modern time, the Protestant Reformers have cut much of the Western
Church off from the ongoing Revelation of the Christian wisdom Tradition.
Few of the
Church Fathers even mention it, and it seems that the only group that loved John as much as the evangelicals now do were the gnostics, and we know what the
early Church did to them.
As I pointed out, there is no reference to it before Eusebius in the 4th century
even though many
early Church Fathers writing centuries
earlier were familiar with the works of Josephus.
Add to this fact that the
early church fathers are not
even in agreement about the gender of Junia.
I think most of the Americans are in lost... as most of them do not know who their
father is and it is very unfortunate...
even if they know who their
father is, the mom has children from diff men outside of marriage... and while a child is being raised, watching what his / her parents do to enjoy their life... so things become normal when they grow up... like if you go back
early nineteen century, women were not allowed to go to beach without being covered... and now it totally opposite... if you do not have a boyfriend or girlfriend before 15, the parents worries that their teenage has some problem... and lot more can be listed... And then you go to
Church, what our children learn from there... they see in front of the
Church an old man's statue with long beard standing with extending of both hand... some of the status are blank, white, Spanish and so on... so they are being taught God as an old dude... then you learn from Catholic that you pray to Jesus, Mother Marry, Saints, Death spirit and all these... the poll shows a huge number of young American turns to Atheism or believing there is no God and so on... Its hard to assume where these nations are going with the name of modernization... nothing wrong having scientists discovered the cure of aids or the pics from mars but... we should all think and learn from our previous generations and correct ourselves... also ppl are becoming so much slave of material things...
Nevertheless, the first and
even the subsequent
early councils were not called at random but because there were people ---- like Arius, Sabellius, the Nestorians (though not Nestorius), and others ---- who were teaching things about Jesus, the
Father, or the Holy Spirit that, so far as our evidence can tell us, were not being taught by the majority of the
Church.
The teachings of Jesus were also the primary content of the Gospel of Thomas and similar writings which were rejected, prohibited and
even destroyed by the
early church fathers.
If Paul did not fully understand his experience, his followers and the
early church fathers understood it
even less.
Yet, as the
early Church Father St Justin points out, not
even the fervent devotees, or worshippers, of Sol invictus («unconquered sun») were prepared to lay down their lives for the sun — unlike the decisive witness of martyrdom of Christians.
In fact, you can
even find some
early church fathers who seem to have supported subordinationism before the Nicene Creed was affirmed.
This is also in part because evangelicals today are reading the
early Church Fathers and the Reformers and appropriating aspects of the great tradition that would have been unthinkable
even a generation or two ago.
The following «thy will be done, on earth as in heaven» in Matthew is doubtless liturgical explication, but the petition itself differs from the Kaddish petition, «May he establish his kingdom in your lifetime and in your days and in the lifetime of all the house of Israel,
even speedily and at a near time», which it parallels in sentiment, in ways which are characteristic of Jesus, not the
early Church: the brevity of formulation (cf. «
Father [abba]» versus «Our
Father who art in heaven»); the intimate «Thy» for the formal «his»; and the use of the verb «to come» rather than «to establish» (the
early Church prayed for the coming of the Lord, not the Kingdom, cf. I Cor.