My worry is that as a society we are now turning away from the rule of law, lawyers, and
even from the justice system.
Not exact matches
While the points made by these gentlemen are both valid and critically important, they fail to take note of four other dangerous subsidies: (1) the market perception that the Washington and Wall Street revolving door has rendered these firms immune
from prosecution —
even for repeated, illegal cartel behavior; (2) the ability to spend billions buying back their own stock, effectively propping up their own share price and bad behavior; (3) self - regulation with compromised bodies creating the market perception and reality of a competitive edge; and (4) Congress and the Supreme Court tolerating Wall Street running its own private
justice system (mandatory arbitration) where corrupt acts are kept hidden
from public view until they blow up into catastrophic events to the economy.
for the right web address); and later she had recanted her testimony and falsely accused me at somewhere unknown to me (
even till today) in the judicial
system, which brought into our lives miscarriage of
justice, with the collusive help of some cowardice and malicious judicial officers ZZZ / YYY / VVV who hided their real identities
from us till today, though I as a victim have challenged them to clarify the case with CONFRONTATION all the time;
«Kids for Cash» (2013): Prepare to be
even more disgusted with the criminal
justice system, as this film details the disturbing decision of a once - celebrated judge to sentence kids to outrageously long juvenile detention sentences in exchange for money
from the private company building the detention center.
Most importantly, the introduction of fees must also herald a move towards a more civil - based costs
system, which takes tribunals
even further
from the spirit in which they were established, as otherwise a claimant with a genuine claim would in effect be paying to obtain
justice.
Who are the Self - Rep Navigators LSR lawyers hold a unique perspective regarding the
justice system, different
from that of the litigants, and
even from other traditional lawyers.
But some commentators pounce on the report as evidence of
justice run amok, as did the editorial page editors of The Examiner, who cited the report to conclude: «Every day, defendants are forced to defend themselves
from frivolous lawsuits that clog our judicial
system and often leave them financially ruined —
even if they prevail in court or never
even go to court.»
Even the courts aren't all trying to stay in the same base
system on a federal district court level, which if you're going to be able to coordinate something, that's a top down thing
from the Chief
Justice.
He said the lack of spending has resulted in paper - based and physically outdated and
even decrepit courthouses «that operate in the stone age» and a
justice system in all fields —
from civil and criminal to family law — that users describe as «archaic,» «outdated» and «slow.»
Even coffee baristas have been forced to seek relief
from the civil
justice system to reclaim misappropriated gratuities.
Many people complain about problems in the
Justice system, but very few take some time to think about possible solutions, and
even fewer take the step to go
from the idea to the action and effectively build the solution.
Many criminal
justice systems place such distinct power in the hands of the prosecutor
from the moment he or she possesses incriminating information,
even when the prosecution service is the weakest link of the
system which has often been the case in international criminal
justice.
That is, if we didn't consider what elements of their governance make their
systems,
even if far
from perfect, nevertheless so much better than ours when it comes to affordable and accessible civil
justice.
In other words, most people in the
Justice system, from lawyers, to law societies, to judges, to academics, and even the public at large — view «justice» from a paradigm of «what has been» as opposed to «what could be.
Justice system,
from lawyers, to law societies, to judges, to academics, and
even the public at large — view «
justice» from a paradigm of «what has been» as opposed to «what could be.
justice»
from a paradigm of «what has been» as opposed to «what could be.»